I Saw Missing Malaysia Airlines Flight MH370 In Water – Woman says

Date: 22-03-2014 1:49 pm (10 years ago) | Author: franel
[1] 2
- at 22-03-2014 01:49 PM (10 years ago)
(m)
«§» 22 March 2014

As aircraft and ships continued to search for debris which might be that of the missing flight MH370 on Friday a Malaysian woman on a flight across the Indian Ocean claimed to have seen an aircraft in the water near the Andaman Islands on the day the jet disappeared.

The Kuala Lumpur wife was so convinced about what she saw at 2.30pm on March 8, several hours after MH370 vanished, that she filed an official report with police that very day – a full five days before the search for the plane was expanded to the area around the Andaman Islands.



News of her apparent sighting came as a blank was drawn after two days of searching in the Indian Ocean for two objects deemed by experts as possibly being from the missing plane.

Her account will be seen by many as having credibility as the islands lie within the northern corridor officials speculated that the plane might have travelled along after radar contact was lost.

However, Mrs Dalelah said she had received scorn about her account, including from a pilot who said the aircraft she was on would have been too high for her to have seen anything on the ocean below.

But mother of 10 Mrs Latife Dalelah, 53, insisted she saw a silver object in the shape of an aircraft on the water as she was flying from Jeddah to Kuala Lumpur. It was about an hour after her aircraft had flown past the southern Indian city of Chennai.

‘Throughout the journey I was staring out of the window of the aircraft as I couldn’t sleep during the flight,’ she told the New Straits Times.



The in-flight monitor showed that her plane was crossing the Indian Ocean and she had seen several shipping liners and islands – before she saw the silvery object.

‘I took a closer look and was shocked to see what looked like the tail and wing of an aircraft on the water,’ she said.

‘I woke my friends on the flight but they laughed me off,’ she added.

The same reaction has come from a pilot who questioned how anyone flying at about seven miles above sea level could see anything like a boat or ship from so high up.

But Mrs Dalelah insisted to the paper: ‘I know what I saw. I am convinced that I saw the aircraft. I will not lie. I had just returned from my pilgrimage.’



A large part of what she thought was an aircraft was submerged, she said. When she tried to tell an air stewardess what she had seen, she was told to get some sleep.

When her plane landed at Kuala Lumpur at about 4pm on that Saturday she told her children what she had seen. ‘That is when they told me that MH370 had gone missing,’ she told the paper.

‘My son-in-law, a policeman, was convinced that I had seen an aircraft and asked me to lodge a police report the same day.

‘Many of my friends on the flight doubted me at first, but they are beginning to believe me now that we know the plane (MH370) turned back and entered the Indian Ocean.’

[Via: DailyMail]


Posted: at 22-03-2014 01:49 PM (10 years ago) | Hero
- Chylove247 at 22-03-2014 02:05 PM (10 years ago)
(f)
Hmmmmm. 
Posted: at 22-03-2014 02:05 PM (10 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- osarobo62 at 22-03-2014 02:40 PM (10 years ago)
(m)
they need to recheck the sea under the route her plane took when coming to Malaysia .
Posted: at 22-03-2014 02:40 PM (10 years ago) | Hero
Reply
- ObyWBabaK at 22-03-2014 03:27 PM (10 years ago)
(m)
 Shocked Indian Ocean!!  Shocked   God help
Posted: at 22-03-2014 03:27 PM (10 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- Topsylucas at 22-03-2014 03:37 PM (10 years ago)
(f)
So hv dey checkd d indin ocean nw? Hv dey found d debris of d missin plane?
Posted: at 22-03-2014 03:37 PM (10 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- zoe61 at 22-03-2014 04:06 PM (10 years ago)
(f)
 Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes
Posted: at 22-03-2014 04:06 PM (10 years ago) | Hero
Reply
- lanudja at 22-03-2014 04:20 PM (10 years ago)
(f)
I think they shld take what d lady said serious. Even though its nt possible 2 see d sea frm dat hieght her words shld nt be taken 4 granted. Noone can tel.
Posted: at 22-03-2014 04:20 PM (10 years ago) | Hero
Reply
- christianity at 22-03-2014 04:21 PM (10 years ago)
(m)
nawao
Posted: at 22-03-2014 04:21 PM (10 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- djamil at 22-03-2014 05:05 PM (10 years ago)
(m)
she is right cause am just viewing aljazeera now when they confirm it.
Posted: at 22-03-2014 05:05 PM (10 years ago) | Newbie
Reply
- HOPEA23 at 22-03-2014 06:00 PM (10 years ago)
(f)
Dem make den go check the sea first

Posted: at 22-03-2014 06:00 PM (10 years ago) | Addicted Hero
Reply
- angesco at 22-03-2014 06:09 PM (10 years ago)
(f)
If only the air hostess had believed het story and reported  to thd pilot in the cockpit. Thd pilot would hsve then radioed in  - and this "disapearance" would have been solved - QED!
Posted: at 22-03-2014 06:09 PM (10 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- osamabinladin at 22-03-2014 06:12 PM (10 years ago)
(m)
 Roll Eyes
Posted: at 22-03-2014 06:12 PM (10 years ago) | Hero
Reply
- paulohking at 22-03-2014 06:49 PM (10 years ago)
(m)
Roll Eyes
Posted: at 22-03-2014 06:49 PM (10 years ago) | Hero
Reply
- Lateef67 at 22-03-2014 07:18 PM (10 years ago)
(m)
Wonderful GOD
Posted: at 22-03-2014 07:18 PM (10 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- iamDonc at 22-03-2014 07:29 PM (10 years ago)
(m)
Pray for MH370
Posted: at 22-03-2014 07:29 PM (10 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- dareper at 22-03-2014 08:46 PM (10 years ago)
(m)
It might be true oo
Posted: at 22-03-2014 08:46 PM (10 years ago) | Hero
Reply
- nobleladyG at 22-03-2014 08:56 PM (10 years ago)
(f)
God!

Posted: at 22-03-2014 08:56 PM (10 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- daveobahon at 22-03-2014 10:19 PM (10 years ago)
(m)
na lie
Posted: at 22-03-2014 10:19 PM (10 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- IDOKOO at 22-03-2014 10:37 PM (10 years ago)
(m)
She saw d plane truely
Posted: at 22-03-2014 10:37 PM (10 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- yettyness at 22-03-2014 10:38 PM (10 years ago)
(f)
ok
Posted: at 22-03-2014 10:38 PM (10 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
[1] 2