Ex-Boyfriend Of Former Miss World Kenya To Pay Her KSh1 million For Leaking Her Nood Photo

“The 3rd Respondent (Frank Zahiten) had by his close relationship as a boy-friend of the petitioner accessed the petitioner’s photographs, and may indeed have taken some of them, but he had no authority to publish the private photographs.
 
“In forwarding the private photographs of the petitioner to the 2nd respondent (Terry Mungai), the 3rd respondent had violated the petitioner’s right to privacy of information under Article 31 (c) of the Constitution, and the petitioner is entitled to compensation in damages.
 
“The petitioner did not adduce evidence sufficient for the court to assess the damages for the breach of the petitioner’s right to privacy.  Accordingly, the Court will award modest damages for the breach of the right to privacy in the sum of Ksh.1,000,000/- against the 3rd respondent (Frank Zahiten),”

“…Entry rules for the national contestants as shown in the Entry Agreement for the global Miss World event 2016 stipulate that the winner must warrant under Schedule D (o) (ii) to Miss World Limited
 
“That she has never permitted any offensive, indecent, immoral or Nood or semi-Nood photographs of her to be taken. This provision would appear to disqualify the petitioner irrespective of who took the Nood photographs.”