Hon. Patrick Obahiagbon Speaks (Page 2)

If ds man no kill grammar den grammar go kill am,shoooo! wetin hapen sef,i couldn't comprehened anythimg 4rm ds interview. I wonda hw he dey take communicate wit him family. If na my papa e b, i 4 no dey stay dsame house wit am cos 1day our roof go fall bcos of grammar bt all dsame i dey enjoy d lyrics sha, ds man supose to join dem basket mouth n odas 4 nite of a thousand laugh.

Posted: at 26-11-2010 05:34 AM (13 years ago) | Upcoming

 PATRICK,I KNOW U WILL NOT EVEN UNDERSTAND WHAT ARE U SAYING,BENIN MAN NA BENIN MAN,ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD,I ADVICE HIM TO TAKE HIS DICTIONARY,OK AND STOP SPEAKING NONSENSE TO THE PEOPLE,

Posted: at 26-11-2010 06:22 AM (13 years ago) | Newbie

Oghene...My Head? Sadonism, Aristozioning, Epileptic Nepotism, Political Armadarendum, Bambozoodsarakpoism...Shuooo! Na wetin? Abeg na who dis man dey represent for House of Reps sef?...This man nor go broke person head o!


abeg live matter shaa, grammar na wetin we want chop? use fake grammar dey thief our money naaaaaaaaaaaaaa

---

Posted: at 26-11-2010 06:32 AM (13 years ago) | Addicted Hero

the grammer high sha but he for let the grammer enter sentence well but he was saying the truth , and if only he is not changing to ACN of less chance`s in PDP

Posted: at 26-11-2010 09:08 AM (13 years ago) | Upcoming

there is originality nd creativity in his use of words

Posted: at 26-11-2010 09:24 AM (13 years ago) | Newbie

oya make una dey speak I dey hear

Posted: at 26-11-2010 09:46 AM (13 years ago) | Gistmaniac

Cyril that guy grammar na die  ..... he need to go for altra sound

Posted: at 26-11-2010 10:16 AM (13 years ago) | Gistmaniac

At least his father's money is not west.

Posted: at 26-11-2010 10:44 AM (13 years ago) | Newbie

dis man nd to go for a better education,,,,,,,,,,

Posted: at 26-11-2010 11:44 AM (13 years ago) | Newbie

The penchant for grandiloquence is necessitated by the subtle, latent ideal of blanking off a genre of listeners to the advantage of absolute submission to the whims of the speaker. In this unlikely event that the entire readership is propelled by comprehension of the foregoing, literary interjections from objections will be certain enhancing literary hiatuses on the part of the speaker. This will be a negative especially when crucial matters are affected by the discourse.

I agree completely that this range of lexicon is not required for general use and suggests the need for a systematic down-tune; however, it absolves him of any form of blatant insensitivity (and wrong doing) as suggested by your posts when reviewed from the mosaic that his primary audience, being honourable members of the house, should as a rule, be schooled in the most prefactory degree of rhetorics and communication and possible deviations from this rule tantamount to self mortification.

Please let him alone to bask in the splendour of a well sought after, respect-deserving feat!

Posted: at 26-11-2010 12:11 PM (13 years ago) | Gistmaniac