ogunfunmi at 10-02-2009 06:55 PM (15 years ago) (f)
Quote from: Fesh on 10-02-2009 10:18 AM
Hia, who is Obi? Can he shoot? Not disciplined. Passes not accurate as to be compared with FABRI-PASS. Pls Obi is still tender!
Fab is better abeg!
fesh thanks very much and forget about them..should we talk about goals or passes and fabri-pass cant kill attack but mikel is still comming up...dont make mistakes because is your 9ija broda say the true please
Posted: at 10-02-2009 06:55 PM (15 years ago) | Gistmaniac
ceejay58 at 12-02-2009 11:09 PM (15 years ago) (m)
i really think that if only the poster is sane enough he should be saying Obi and Denilson..... cos Fabulous Fab is way way ahead of ur obi............. pls throw national sentiment to the thrash can abeg.
Posted: at 12-02-2009 11:09 PM (15 years ago) | Hero
wat is it fabrigas can do mikel cannot do? it is only bcos mikel is no d same position as fabrigas let dat position and see if he will not play beta dan him i choose mikel ahead fabrigas.
Posted: at 16-02-2009 04:00 PM (15 years ago) | Newbie
yemi6083 at 18-02-2009 05:40 AM (15 years ago) (m)
delaruz,, u should be punished for tht stupid post.. fabregas is one of the 5 best midfielders in europe, mikel on the other hand is not even in the top 10... u might be sayin he's a bad guy cuz he strts at chelsea.. he only does cuz essien is injured..
i kno u want to be loyal cuz mikel is nigerian n all, but please do it with sense.... this is insane.. fabregas is way ahead of mikel wen it comes to class...
im a man u fan, so u kno for me to say this im being totally honest
Posted: at 18-02-2009 05:40 AM (15 years ago) | Newbie
I BELIEVE STRONGLY THAT MIKEL OBI IS FAR BETTER THAN FABREGAS. IT VERY CLEAR THIS DOES NOT NEED A DEBATE. it is really clear dat obi is better than fab
BEN
Posted: at 26-02-2009 09:21 AM (15 years ago) | Newbie
jeffy2drescue at 26-02-2009 11:43 AM (15 years ago) (m)
oops, mikel? Fabregas?---- well in actual sense, they are both good players, but on comparism mikel for now is a holding midfielder while fabregas is growing as an attacking midfielder. mikel is a quick passer of d ball, faberegas can strike and psh forward as well. in conclusion they are not comparable. mikel is good where he his and fabregas is good. mikel has an advantage becos he can play as an attacking midfielder too, i will conclude mikel is better than fabregas.
Posted: at 26-02-2009 11:43 AM (15 years ago) | Newbie
TRENDING GISTS 
solar123
Fesh
benomolu
ogunfunmi
crimeking
ceejay58
yemi6083
delaruz
bilol
Dguy
baloo
ekemluv
mikel is good where he his and fabregas is good. mikel has an advantage becos he can play as an attacking midfielder too, i will conclude mikel is better than fabregas. 
elusakin
oyebola
Manufacturing Giant, PZ Cussons Considers Leaving Africa After 140yrs Over Nigeria’s Sales Plunge
Man Shoots His Friend Dead For Taking a Bite Out of His Girlfriend's Burger
Come Out And Confess Why You Kill Mohbad - Ghanaian Prophet Who Prophesied Junior Pope’s Death Calls Sam Larry
I'm Yet To Be Contacted By NFF – Peseiro Breaks Silence On Super Eagles' Return
UPDATE: Security Operatives Launch Manhunt For 109 Fleeing Inmates Of Suleja Prison
How Police Inspector Aliyu Taofeek Sent Patrick Chinemerem to His Early Grave in Lagos