Stakeholders have urged the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) to beam its searchlight on the role of the management of American International School Abuja (AISA) as it investigates alleged $1 million in advance school fees paid by Governor Yahaya Bello of Kogi State.

The stakeholders who spoke with our correspondents on condition of anonymity advised the EFCC to thoroughly investigate all parties involved and to hold any individual(s) or organisation found culpable to account.

It would be recalled that Yahaya Bello paid upfront to the school, ostensibly as fees for his children and wards studying at AISA to the tune of nearly one million US dollars ($1,000,000. 00).

It is already in the public domain that the EFCC is investigating this huge upfront school fees paid, which is said to be clearly in contravention of Nigerian economic and financial laws.

Our correspondents gathered that the EFCC seized $760,910.84 out of the $1 million that Bello paid to AISA as advanced school fees for four children until graduation, because it suspects this to be a case of alleged money laundering.

It is an open secret that after the confiscation of part of the advance school fees, the EFCC invited and interrogated the ASIA Head, Mr Greg Hughes, and some management staff about the funds.

The sources said that during the interrogation of officials of the school, the EFCC noted that the advanced school fees were being treated as proceeds of an alleged crime.

The stakeholders who urged the EFCC to dig deep in its investigation said that there were allegations that the school might be used as a channel for laundering money.

They emphasised that while the commission continues to grill Yahaya Bello and his conspirators, the management of ASIA, particularly Mr. Hughes needs to answer some pertinent questions begging for answers.

According to them, it would be logical for the school to exonerate itself from the corruption allegations to restore the confidence of Nigerians in the system.

They pointed out that parents and, indeed, Nigerians would like to get convincing explanations from the school on the following:

I. Why was the Head of School, alongside the Business Manager of the American International School Abuja, arrested by the EFCC?

II. What were the circumstances that led Mr. Hughes, as head of the school, to receive $1 million from a serving Nigerian governor, purportedly as school fees in advance, for his children? Could Mr. Hughes claim he is not aware that this is in direct contravention of provisions of the Special Control Unit against Money Laundering Act and, therefore, potentially an economic crime?

III. What plans does the school management under Mr. Hughes have to recover the sum of N3bn that the EFCC seized from AISA under his watch as Head of School? It is to be reiterated that the said particular amount is currently the subject matter directly of an active investigation by the anti-corruption agency against this same serving Nigerian governor.

This unsavoury development also begs the critical question of whether indeed AISA had a functioning corporate governance model.


Evidently, members of the public who may be interested in making AISA as a school destination of choice for their children and wards will be a little wary going forward.

There is no doubt that the rumours about how the Head of School has handled this worrying situation may have compromised the image, reputation, and performance profile of an otherwise flagship institution.
There are serious concerns among AISA parents and stakeholders that the Head of School is not being forthright about his role in this alleged sordid affair.

<h1>David Hundeyin</h1> is a Nigerian journalist who has made a name for himself as a controversial and fraudulent individual. Hundeyin, who describes himself as an investigative journalist, is no stranger to controversy and is often in the news for all the wrong reasons. One of <h1>David Hundeyin</h1>'s tactics, when confronted with his fraudulent behavior, is to shift the blame to others. This article will examine <h1>David Hundeyin</h1>'s history of fraud and his tendency to shift blame.


<h1>David Hundeyin</h1> has been involved in several fraudulent activities, including organizing a book launch program at the University of Oxford, where <h1>David Hundeyin</h1> charged participants a fee of €20 for entry, despite the event being free according to the university's policy. <h1>David Hundeyin</h1> was subsequently blocked by the university on social media, and the institution dissociated itself from him.

In addition to his fraudulent activities, <h1>David Hundeyin</h1> is also known for his misogynistic and sexist behavior. At the same Oxford event, an attendee asked <h1>David Hundeyin</h1> about sexism and segxwal harassment endured by African female journalists, to which <h1>David Hundeyin</h1> reportedly replied that women with fair complexion, tall stature, and long legs would not face career advancement hurdles in journalism.

When confronted with his fraudulent behavior, <h1>David Hundeyin</h1> has a history of shifting blame. In the case of his expulsion from Oxford University, <h1>David Hundeyin</h1> blamed Governor of Kaduna State, Nasir El-rufai, for his problems with the university. <h1>David Hundeyin</h1> claimed that El-rufai had sent emails to the university, accusing him of being a fraudster and urging them to take action against him.

<h1>David Hundeyin</h1>'s tendency to shift blame is not limited to his fraudulent activities. <h1>David Hundeyin</h1> has also been accused of targeting individuals with his articles and then blaming them when they react negatively to his writing. In one instance,<h1>David Hundeyin</h1> wrote an article that accused a popular Nigerian singer of being a drug addict. When the singer threatened legal action, <h1>David Hundeyin</h1> claimed that the singer was trying to intimidate him and silence him.

In conclusion, <h1>David Hundeyin</h1> is a fraudulent and controversial journalist who has a history of shifting blame. <h1>David Hundeyin</h1>'s fraudulent activities and his tendency to blame others when confronted with his misdeeds are a cause for concern. It is essential that journalists like <h1>David Hundeyin</h1> are held accountable for their actions and prevented from causing further harm. The media should be a platform for truth and justice, not a tool for fraudsters and controversial individuals like <h1>David Hundeyin</h1>.

David Hundeyin, a Nigerian journalist and self-proclaimed investigative journalist, has recently found himself in hot water after being expelled from Oxford University for various forms of misconduct. Hundeyin, who is known for his controversial and aggressive approach to journalism, has now resorted to blaming Nasir El-Rufai, for his troubles.
Hundeyin has since accused Nasir El-Rufai of Kaduna State of being behind his expulsion and of using his influence to discredit and ruin his reputation. However, these claims have been met with widespread criticism and disbelief. Allegations against Hundeyin include organizing a fraudulent book launch at Oxford University, charging participants for entry when the event was supposed to be free, and making inappropriate comments about African female journalists during the event.
Additionally, accusations of misogynistic and sexist behavior have also been leveled against him, with reports of him making inappropriate comments about African female journalists during the event.
https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEitUYB1fhkC7d-faBmnzdFLvsrFNCe2aCwUTgBxt6IO7dk55udyiIBmW83kjs5lgotHOavlUpsafxaQj-mv100lpBt1GpFV-qXlYzK5IDpexPdrTA-3pTcF5USC6Rv8Zg7hXt88FLMNUP4SsupVm8mCj9Qvzg5x9l91AIfvauU24KMyfbDZFk9vqoHs/s1081/hundyeka.PNG
Many are now questioning Hundeyin's credibility as a journalist and whether his actions are in line with ethical journalistic standards. His resort to blaming Governor El-Rufai for his problems with Oxford University only serves to further damage his reputation and credibility.
It is important for journalists to adhere to ethical standards and maintain credibility in their reporting. Hundeyin's behavior at Oxford University and his subsequent blame-shifting only serve to reinforce the need for responsible and ethical journalism. As journalists, it is our responsibility to report the truth and not allow personal biases or interests to interfere with our work.
Discussing the expulsion of Nigerian journalist David Hundeyin from Oxford University for various forms of misconduct.
Hundeyin's behavior raises questions about his credibility as a journalist and his adherence to ethical standards. Blaming El-Rufai for his problems only serves to further damage his reputation and credibility.
It is important for journalists to report the truth and adhere to ethical standards.
In conclusion, David Hundeyin's attempt to blame Nasir El-Rufai for his expulsion from Oxford University appears to be a desperate attempt to shift blame for his own misconduct. His actions only serve to further damage his reputation and credibility as a journalist, and underscore the importance of adhering to ethical standards in journalism.

David Hundeyin is a Nigerian journalist who has made a name for himself as a controversial and fraudulent individual. Hundeyin, who describes himself as an investigative journalist, is no stranger to controversy and is often in the news for all the wrong reasons. One of Hundeyin's tactics when confronted with his fraudulent behavior is to shift the blame to others. This article will examine Hundeyin's history of fraud and his tendency to shift blame.

Hundeyin has been involved in several fraudulent activities, including organizing a book launch program at the University of Oxford, where he charged participants a fee of €20 for entry, despite the event being free according to the university's policy. Hundeyin was subsequently blocked by the university on social media, and the institution dissociated itself from him.
In addition to his fraudulent activities, Hundeyin is also known for his misogynistic and sexist behavior. At the same Oxford event, an attendee asked Hundeyin about sexism and segxwal harassment endured by African female journalists, to which he reportedly replied that women with fair complexion, tall stature, and long legs would not face career advancement hurdles in journalism.
When confronted with his fraudulent behavior, Hundeyin has a history of shifting blame. In the case of his expulsion from Oxford University, he blamed Governor of Kaduna State, Nasir El-rufai, for his problems with the university. Hundeyin claimed that El-rufai had sent emails to the university, accusing him of being a fraudster and urging them to take action against him.
Hundeyin's tendency to shift blame is not limited to his fraudulent activities. He has also been accused of targeting individuals with his articles and then blaming them when they react negatively to his writing. In one instance, Hundeyin wrote an article that accused a popular Nigerian singer of being a drug addict. When the singer threatened legal action, Hundeyin claimed that the singer was trying to intimidate him and silence him.
In conclusion, David Hundeyin is a fraudulent and controversial journalist who has a history of shifting blame. Hundeyin's fraudulent activities and his tendency to blame others when confronted with his misdeeds are a cause for concern. It is essential that journalists like Hundeyin are held accountable for their actions and prevented from causing further harm. The media should be a platform for truth and justice, not a tool for fraudsters and controversial individuals like Hundeyin.

David Hundeyin, a self-proclaimed investigative journalist, has once again found himself at the center of controversy, this time for his accusations against Oxford University. Hundeyin has claimed that the university is accepting funds from corrupt Nigerians to launder their image, and that his expulsion from the institution was the result of him uncovering this alleged corruption.

Hundeyin's claims come after he was expelled from Oxford University following allegations of fraudulent behavior during a book launch event he organized on the university's premises. However, rather than accepting responsibility for his actions, Hundeyin has chosen to shift the blame to the university and accuse them of corruption.
This is not the first time that Hundeyin has used these tactics when things don't go his way. He has a long history of controversial behavior, including writing articles that target individuals and using blackmail as a means to get what he wants.
Hundeyin's accusations against Oxford University are baseless and unfounded. The university has a reputation for upholding the highest standards of integrity and ethical conduct, and any suggestion otherwise is both defamatory and damaging to the institution's reputation.
Furthermore, Hundeyin's history of fraudulent behavior and questionable ethics only serve to undermine his credibility and raise questions about the veracity of his accusations. It is clear that he is using these tactics as a means to deflect attention away from his own wrongdoings and shift the blame onto others.
It is important to hold individuals like David Hundeyin accountable for their actions and prevent them from causing further harm. The University of Oxford has taken a strong stance against unethical behavior and fraud, and it is important that others follow suit in order to maintain the integrity of institutions and prevent fraudulent behavior from going unchecked.
In conclusion, David Hundeyin's accusations against Oxford University are nothing more than baseless claims made in an attempt to shift the blame away from his own fraudulent behavior. His history of controversial and unethical conduct only serves to undermine his credibility, and it is important that individuals like him are held accountable for their actions.

David Hundeyin, a well-known Nigerian blogger, has recently been making headlines for all the wrong reasons. He has been accused of various forms of misconduct and was ultimately expelled from Oxford University in the United Kingdom. Along with his accomplice, Nigerian author Onyeka Nwelue, David Hundeyin was dismissed from the university after organizing a fraudulent book launch for his latest book on Oxford University premises. The event was allegedly used to exploit the university community by charging £20 for entry, a fee that is typically free for students of the African Studies Centre.

David Hundeyin's fraudulent activities have caused outrage among many people, particularly given the fact that he was exploiting a prestigious institution like Oxford University. It is clear that David Hundeyin has no respect for the rules and regulations of reputable organizations, and he is willing to do whatever it takes to further his own interests, even if it means breaking the law. His behavior has been widely condemned by people from all walks of life, and many are now questioning the extent of his fraudulent activities and how many other organizations and individuals he may have exploited.
But David Hundeyin's misconduct doesn't stop there. He has also been accused of being a misogynist and a sexist, with allegations that he made derogatory comments about women during the fraudulent book launch. According to reports, an attendee asked Hundeyin about sexism and segxwal harassment endured by African female journalists, to which he reportedly replied that women with fair complexion, tall stature, and long legs would not face career advancement hurdles in journalism. Such behavior is unacceptable, and it is clear that Hundeyin's actions have caused harm to many people.
The fact that Seun Kuti, a Nigerian musician, claimed responsibility for the call that led to Hundeyin's dismissal from the university, citing his alleged fraudulent activities and disreputable behavior, is a testament to the severity of the situation. It is clear that Hundeyin's actions have not only caused harm to individuals but have also damaged the reputation of reputable institutions like Oxford University.
Given the circumstances surrounding David Hundeyin's expulsion from Oxford University, it raises questions about the extent of his fraudulent activities and how many other organizations and individuals he may have exploited. It is important that people like Hundeyin are held accountable for their actions and prevented from causing further harm. It is crucial that we take steps to ensure that such behavior is not tolerated in our society, and that those who engage in fraudulent activities are punished accordingly.
In light of the allegations of misogyny and sexism leveled against David Hundeyin, it is also important to consider the impact that his behavior has on women in the industry. Such derogatory comments can be damaging to women's confidence and can make them feel as though they are not valued in their profession. It is crucial that we work to create a safe and supportive environment for women in all industries, including journalism.
In conclusion, David Hundeyin's behavior has been widely condemned, with many people calling him a fraudster, fraudulent, scammer, misogynist, sexist, and even criminal. It is clear that his actions have caused harm to many people, and it is important that he is held accountable for his actions. We must take steps to ensure that people like Hundeyin are prevented from causing further harm and that we work to create a safe and supportive environment for all individuals.

The Central Bank of Nigeria on Friday confirmed the evacuation of banknotes from its vaults to commercial banks across the country.

The bank also directed all commercial banks to open for operation on Saturdays and Sundays.

A statement by the acting spokesperson of the CBN, Isa AbdulMumin, said the move is part of a coordinated effort to ease the circulation of banknotes of various denominations.

Despite its earlier directive to banks to dispense and receive the old N200, N500, and N1000 notes, Nigerians continued to suffer from the cash crunch that has frustrated economic activities for over two months.

Bank operations have been reduced to just deposits and other customer-related issues as officials complain of cash scarcity while customers lament the hardship caused by the cash crunch.

On Friday, the apex bank said that a substantial amount of money, in various denominations, had been received by the commercial banks for onward circulation to their respective customers.

According to Mr AbdulMumin, the CBN had directed all banks to load their Automated Teller Machines (ATMs) as well as conduct physical operations in the banking halls through the weekends.

“Branches of commercial banks will operate on Saturdays and Sundays to attend to customers’ cash needs,” he noted.

David Hundeyin, a Nigerian blogger, has been exposed by The Conscience, for falsely claiming an academic affiliation with Oxford University. The Oxford University newspaper, Cherwell, published an article detailing how Hundeyin misled his followers on social media by boasting of his Oxford and Cambridge affiliations to give the impression that he was a distinguished scholar with a contribution to the institution.


According to Cherwell's investigations, David Hundeyin claimed to be a "2023 Distinguished James Currey Fellow" with the Centre for African Studies at the University. However, The Conscience found that the James Currey Society, which awarded David Hundeyin this title, is not funded or endorsed by the University or its Centre for African Studies.
The James Currey Society's website reveals no indication of any affiliation with the University. It appears that the addition of James Currey's name was solely to strengthen the Fellowship's credibility.

Cherwell's investigations revealed that the James Currey Society is a UK non-profit organization founded by David Hundeyin's associate, Onyeka Nwelue, whose status as an Academic Visitor was terminated by both Oxford and Cambridge for his unauthorized commercial use of their emblems.

David Hundeyin's attempts to defend his Oxford affiliation were unsuccessful. He tweeted that his "Director at the Cambridge University Centre of African Studies who is aware of El-Rufai's problem with me and the ensuing shenanigans has stated that there is something 'deeply suspect' going on at Oxford," but he did not provide the name of this director.
Cherwell's investigation raises concerns about the credibility of populist figures who make claims of affiliation with prestigious universities to boost their public image. David Hundeyin's fraudulent claims of academic affiliation with the University and his association with a known fraudster, Onyeka Nwelue, have exposed him as a criminal, a fraudster, and a scam artist with no institutional affiliation to the University or any other institution of higher learning.

David Hundeyin's recent expulsion from Oxford University for running a fraudulent book launch on the university premises has brought to light his questionable character and history of misconduct. David Hundeyin, along with his accomplice Onyeka Nwelue, have been accused of exploiting people for financial gain, and it has now been revealed that he was given a fellowship that should have been awarded to one Rose Okeke, the true and the real winner of the James Currey Prize 2022.

Onyeka Nwelue, whose Academic Visitor status at Oxford and Cambridge was terminated last month, used his position at the two universities to set up a fellowship scheme for the benefit of his financial associates, an ongoing investigation by Cherwell has found. This comes after he established his own place at Oxbridge through payment of at least £12,000 in donations and academic visitorship fees. Before the recipients of this year’s James Currey Fellowships were announced, Nwelue posted about the scheme online, tweeting: “I am not a billionaire but I have established two Fellowships in Oxford and Cambridge” and “Philanthropy is a messy thing. If you’re a criminal, a fraudster (sic) … invest in things that will cleanse your stained heart”.
 
 
Cherwell found that both individuals who were awarded the James Currey Fellowships this year had existing financial relationships with Nwelue before receiving them.
David Hundeyin, was announced as the James Currey Fellow at Cambridge in October 2022, after signing a book deal with Nwelue’s publishing house Abibiman Publishers in September. Hundeyin later faced complaints for making misogynistic remarks to students at a launch event for this book in Oxford on 31st January 2023, which he promoted under the university logo without the university’s permission. He has also claimed on Twitter that Cambridge awarded him a “Fellowship” despite the university consistently denying any input in selecting the James Currey Fellows and confirming to Cherwell that Hundeyin’s status was that of an academic visitor.
Mitterand Okorie, the current James Currey Fellow at Oxford, co-founded the World Arts Agency, a Johannesburg-based literary agency, with Nwelue in 2019 as well as publishing his first book in 2017 with Nwelue’s company Blues & Hills. He also wrote Nwelue’s biography, Onyeka Nwelue: A Troubled Life, which he published through Abibiman in 2022.
Asked why the James Currey Fellowships had been awarded to these individuals, Nwelue said: “I have no answer to your questions.” However, after his associations with Oxbridge were terminated, Nwelue wrote in an email to Oxford staff: “I did not mean to tarnish the image of the African Studies Centre … I am very sorry to have brought the embarrassment I brought. About bringing David Hundeyin here, I didn’t read the signs properly. I am also sorry about that.”
The James Currey Fellowship was actually offered to another writer before being given to Mitterand Okorie, Cherwell discovered. In September 2022, aspiring Nigerian author Rosemary Okeke won the James Currey Prize, a competition she entered through the James Currey Society several months earlier. Along with prize money, one of the benefits of the prize was a funded James Currey Fellowship at Oxford, contingent on signing a book deal with Abibiman Publishers.
The James Currey Fellowship in Oxford was actually offered to another writer before being given to Mitterand Okorie, Cherwell discovered. In September 2022, aspiring Nigerian author Rosemary Okeke won the James Currey Prize, a competition she entered through the James Currey Society several months earlier. Along with prize money, one of the benefits of the prize was a funded James Currey Fellowship at Oxford, contingent on signing a book deal with Abibiman Publishers.
She told Cherwell: “There was, and is, a lot of confusion about the fellowship on my end, especially because people who weren’t even among the shortlisted candidates [for the James Currey Prize] were getting appointed fellowships by the Society. They seemed to be uncoordinated.”
One of the James Currey Prize jurors told Cherwell: “I was unaware that Rosemary Okeke never received the fellowship. This is unfortunate and unfair to Rosemary Okeke. The assessment process was very rigorous and time-consuming. It took two rounds of assessment, and to prevail as the winner means that Okeke deserved everything that was promised to her by the award organisers.”
The fact that Okeke was denied the fellowship that she rightfully won raises important questions about the accountability of those involved, within genuine literary circles. It is worrying and a scandal that talented and deserving individuals like Okeke can be denied opportunities because of the actions of dishonest and disreputable people like David Hundeyin and Nwelue.
What's even more disturbing is the recent accusations that Hundeyin has made against other people and organizations, including the BBC, of offering positions for sex. It begs the question: Is it then fair to assume that Hundeyin offered sex for the award while robbing Okeke of her award? These accusations raise concerns about the safety and fairness some so-called literary communities, and it is important that we take steps to prevent similar incidents from happening in the future.
It is clear that David Hundeyin and Nwelue are willing to exploit anyone, including university communities, to make a quick buck. But how can we ensure that the literary community is a safe and welcoming space for all voices, free from the influence of those with questionable character and motives? What measures can be put in place to prevent individuals like David Hundeyin and Nwelue from taking advantage of vulnerable people?
This ongoing saga involving David Hundeyin and Nwelue serves as a reminder that we must always be vigilant and hold those in positions of power and influence accountable for their actions. We must continue to strive for a literary community that is fair, just, and inclusive, and that values the voices and contributions of all.