Obesere did not deny not sleeping with the girl, neither did he deny asking the girl to go to hospital for treatment? This literarily means that the girl is telling the whole truth. Now if we all agree that obesere slept with the girl, and later asked her to go to hospital for treatment which is already established by the above argument, why don't we also agree that he molested her based on the confirmed hospital report?? How could obesere claim they were lovers, when they only met barely weeks to the day of the alleged rape? How could they have been lovers when the girl's visit was her first in obesere's house barely two weeks of their meeting. Using indutive and deductive reasoning, one could clearly deduce that randy obesere molested this innocent girl, and now he is trying to use money and connection to suppress the truth.
I THINK YOU SHOULD BE HER LAWYER....