Be The Judge Of This Case: She Went to Jail For Not Killing Her Hubby & Then The Worst Happened

Date: 22-09-2019 8:06 pm (3 years ago) | Author: kacy lee
- at 22-09-2019 08:06 PM (3 years ago)
(f)

A woman was accused of killing her husband, his body was never found and she was sentenced. Years after serving her jail term, she found out the man is living with another woman. .
She went and shot the man several times and he died for real this time around and she was re-arrested for the same murder on the same person.

As a judge, will you look at the case as a fresh murder or will you look at it as a crime she already served the term?

Let's hear you...


Posted: at 22-09-2019 08:06 PM (3 years ago) | Addicted Hero
- blowout at 22-09-2019 08:26 PM (3 years ago)
(m)
Double jeopardy. She has already served time for the crime. Free her.
Posted: at 22-09-2019 08:26 PM (3 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- Doyourworst at 22-09-2019 09:20 PM (3 years ago)
(m)
You can't jail her again for killing a spirit!....Lol.
Posted: at 22-09-2019 09:20 PM (3 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- MrBlackman at 22-09-2019 09:39 PM (3 years ago)
(m)
The law is, A person convicted of murder cannot finish a jail term.
It's either she's sentenced to death or life imprisonment.
Ṣo if she was freed, then it implies that she was never convicted for murder earlier but for another offensé.
She has to now answer for the murder of her husband
Posted: at 22-09-2019 09:39 PM (3 years ago) | Newbie
Reply
- kuzine at 22-09-2019 11:04 PM (3 years ago)
(m)
That means she was convicted of manslaughter earlier on, now she will go in for a life sentence or death penalty based on 1st degree murder 'cos a weapon/fire arm was used.
With a good lawyer though there might be plea on the basis of insanity, non the less she will be locked up in an asylum/ mental facility.
Posted: at 22-09-2019 11:04 PM (3 years ago) | Newbie
Reply
- dareper at 22-09-2019 11:17 PM (3 years ago)
(m)
Quote from: kuzine on 22-09-2019 11:04 PM
That means she was convicted of manslaughter earlier on, now she will go in for a life sentence or death penalty based on 1st degree murder 'cos a weapon/fire arm was used.
With a good lawyer though there might be plea on the basis of insanity, non the less she will be locked up in an asylum/ mental facility.
man, u go school
Posted: at 22-09-2019 11:17 PM (3 years ago) | Hero
Reply
- nkem_don at 23-09-2019 11:05 AM (3 years ago)
(m)
If she was convicted for 10 years  then  now she should get lesser conviction because she was wrongly confronted before  and i strongly believe that prompted her recent crime.
Posted: at 23-09-2019 11:05 AM (3 years ago) | Newbie
Reply
- Haso112 at 24-09-2019 08:32 AM (3 years ago)
(m)
Quote from: kuzine on 22-09-2019 11:04 PM
That means she was convicted of manslaughter earlier on, now she will go in for a life sentence or death penalty based on 1st degree murder 'cos a weapon/fire arm was used.
With a good lawyer though there might be plea on the basis of insanity, non the less she will be locked up in an asylum/ mental facility.

A WEAPON OR FIREARM BEING USED IN ANY CASE WHERE A LIFE'S BEEN TAKEN, DOESN'T AUTOMATICALLY EQUATE TO "FIRST DEGREE MURDER" FIRST DEGREE MURDER'S BASICALLY GOT TO DO WITH INTENT/MOTIVE/PRE-MEDITATION.. A PERFECT CASE STUDY IS OSCAR PISTORIUS & REEVA STEENKAMP.
Posted: at 24-09-2019 08:32 AM (3 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- ebescopy at 25-09-2019 02:13 PM (3 years ago)
(m)
Hanging straight.
Posted: at 25-09-2019 02:13 PM (3 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply