Is it NECESSARY? SAME CHURCH??? (Page 2)

It seem complicated to me too.

Thank you!

Posted: at 24-10-2010 07:37 PM (13 years ago) | Gistmaniac

Why not?I don't see anything wrong in dat

---

Posted: at 24-10-2010 07:48 PM (13 years ago) | Gistmaniac

Both of course.If they attend same church,then that is an evidence of cooperation.If they don't,then its a matter of understanding.Both have their religious believes and dat should not come btw d luv dey share

---

Posted: at 24-10-2010 08:05 PM (13 years ago) | Gistmaniac

Then Wahala don Start be Dat

Well, like PricelessJewel Said, this should be Sorted out be4 the "I DO" 

---

Posted: at 24-10-2010 08:17 PM (13 years ago) | Addicted Hero

Its not by force, it depends on my husband, i dont like his church but he wnt allow me go to another church, then i dont ave a choice but to attend with him.

Posted: at 24-10-2010 08:28 PM (13 years ago) | Gistmaniac

For me i think it's necessary for both couple to attend the same church.......unless if the both of them have different believe

Posted: at 24-10-2010 08:40 PM (13 years ago) | Hero

l Don't think it's Compulsory dat they Attend the same Church Anyway

---

Posted: at 24-10-2010 09:33 PM (13 years ago) | Addicted Hero

no reasons

Posted: at 25-10-2010 07:08 AM (13 years ago) | Gistmaniac

Did they had a church wedding , and if they did , which church wedded them ?

So if they were able to reach a compromise on which church to be wedded in , then choosing a church to be attending after the wedding would not be a problem

---

Posted: at 25-10-2010 07:35 AM (13 years ago) | Hero

why u no fit talk ?

---

Posted: at 25-10-2010 08:24 AM (13 years ago) | Hero