Parents Of 2Yr Old Boy Mauled By Dog In Lagos Reject N300k Compensation By Dog Owner

Date: 22-03-2023 8:20 am (1 year ago) | Author: onuigbo felicia
- at 22-03-2023 08:20 AM (1 year ago)
(f)

Parents of the two-year-old boy, who was mauled by a dog in the Isolo area of Lagos, last month, have rejected the N300,000 paid as compensation by the owner of the dog.

However, reacting, a family friend of the owner of the dog disclosed that aside from the sum, a commercial bus worth N1.9 million was bought for the father of the deceased.

Recalling in tears how the vicious dog mauled her son, Gabriel Ojewale, the bereaved mother, Mrs Funmibola Ojewale, explained: “The ugly incident happened on February 22, 2023. I had gone to the market to buy food items and left Gabriel in the care of my older daughter, Ifeoluwa.

“The dog escaped from the owner’s compound and chased the children that were playing outside. Gabriel, who was just a year and three months old, could not run and the dog attacked him in the face.

“He was rushed to Saint Emmanuel Hospital, where I met them. From there, we were referred to the Lagos State University Teaching Hospital, LASUTH. On our way, we could not move faster because of the traffic and we stopped at Kupa Medical Centre, in Ajao Estate.
“At the medical centre, he was undressed, washed and told to be taken to the LASUTH. But he died on the way.”


Compensation

She expressed disappointment over the manner her family was treated by the owner of the dog.

However, efforts to speak with the owner of the dog were abortive. But a family friend, who claimed to be in the know of the matter, said the family had offered the bereaved father a commercial bus worth N1.9 million.

The family friend who gave her name as Blessing Madu blamed the ugly incident on the negligence of both parents of the dead child and the owner of the dog.

She also described false, claims by the bereaved mother that the dog had been released.

Contacted, Lagos State Police Command Spokesman, Benjamin Hundeyin, said: “The case is on hold because the affected family has not shown up since the case was reported at the State CID. This action of theirs may lead to the case being discontinued.”

Posted: at 22-03-2023 08:20 AM (1 year ago) | Addicted Hero
- kp45 at 22-03-2023 12:56 PM (1 year ago)
(m)
Negligence from both side
Posted: at 22-03-2023 12:56 PM (1 year ago) | Addicted Hero
Reply
- nikiniki at 22-03-2023 01:28 PM (1 year ago)
Online (f)
children can play outside their homes if they do not go to the compound where the dog resides, dog owner is guilty. It doesn't matter if the dog was released/ let out/ or escaped! When you train your dog, it shouldnt be aggressive towards the public without anyone trespassing.
Posted: at 22-03-2023 01:28 PM (1 year ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- FloJoJo at 22-03-2023 03:50 PM (1 year ago)
(f)
The dog owner is guilty of negligence and not the parent of the child as long as the victim didn’t got mauled inside the dog owner house
Posted: at 22-03-2023 03:50 PM (1 year ago) | Upcoming
Reply