Women's Submission Vs Men's Love (Page 9)

Date: 15-03-2011 12:39 pm (11 years ago) | Author: Obiajunwa
1 ... 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 ... 28
- pholake at 15-03-2011 03:59 PM (11 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: trolling on 15-03-2011 03:47 PM
Quote from: truenaija2 on 15-03-2011 03:42 PM
@trolling at that time it was no adultery but now its adultery as incest was no sin and later became sin NB: i understand the bible very well
so this is what i have to say to you read Ex 21:10 and tell me what you come up with.....in the nearest future when 7 women will marry a single man,will you call that adultery? one more thing truenaija your hands are too short to box and I dont engage in cyber-warfare.

Since the time that has been written, that time has not come.........and it shan't in the nearest future......my advise: don't get married until me and other 6 women are ready to fight tooth and nail to marry u
Posted: at 15-03-2011 03:59 PM (11 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- divineproject at 15-03-2011 04:00 PM (11 years ago)
(f)
And I didnt know that a concubine has become the same thing as a legitimately married woman...........

Posted: at 15-03-2011 04:00 PM (11 years ago) | Hero
Reply
- estilizo at 15-03-2011 04:00 PM (11 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: chicanorose on 15-03-2011 03:39 PM
no go over submit ooooooooooooo Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin because men no dey ever appreciate
lol................ Grin Grin Grin

Posted: at 15-03-2011 04:00 PM (11 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- truenaija2 at 15-03-2011 04:00 PM (11 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: pholake on 15-03-2011 03:59 PM
Quote from: trolling on 15-03-2011 03:47 PM
Quote from: truenaija2 on 15-03-2011 03:42 PM
@trolling at that time it was no adultery but now its adultery as incest was no sin and later became sin NB: i understand the bible very well
so this is what i have to say to you read Ex 21:10 and tell me what you come up with.....in the nearest future when 7 women will marry a single man,will you call that adultery? one more thing truenaija your hands are too short to box and I dont engage in cyber-warfare.

Since the time that has been written, that time has not come.........and it shan't in the nearest future......my advise: don't get married until me and other 6 women are ready to fight tooth and nail to marry u

@pholake Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy i just cant stop laughing
Posted: at 15-03-2011 04:00 PM (11 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- pholake at 15-03-2011 04:01 PM (11 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: harold634 on 15-03-2011 03:56 PM
Quote from: trolling on 15-03-2011 03:47 PM
Quote from: truenaija2 on 15-03-2011 03:42 PM
@trolling at that time it was no adultery but now its adultery as incest was no sin and later became sin NB: i understand the bible very well
so this is what i have to say to you read Ex 21:10 and tell me what you come up with.....in the nearest future when 7 women will marry a single man,will you call that adultery? one more thing truenaija your hands are too short to box and I dont engage in cyber-warfare.


POINT OF CORRECTION EX 21:10 DOES NOT TALK ABOUT 7 WOMEN MARRYING ONE MAN. IT IS ISAIAH 4:1

thanks for exposing him Harrold.....how's madam?
Posted: at 15-03-2011 04:01 PM (11 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- estilizo at 15-03-2011 04:02 PM (11 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: FlyMamacita on 15-03-2011 03:48 PM
Quote from: sweetmother on 15-03-2011 03:42 PM
Maybe its time , men start being submissive to their women, since its a modern world,we live in 2011, not stone age.

crase dey worry u.... u wan make a new edition of d Bible too ? abeg ooo

na wa oooo,i just dey laugh

Posted: at 15-03-2011 04:02 PM (11 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- sweetmother at 15-03-2011 04:02 PM (11 years ago)
(f)
@flymamacita my twins are same age as u.They dont dare to talk to elders of my age this way.Thruenaija is right, its not good.
As for ur comment, nowhere in bible u can find that a woman is a slave to her man.so let men be slaves for us then.In my home its 50/50.
Posted: at 15-03-2011 04:02 PM (11 years ago) | Newbie
Reply
- trolling at 15-03-2011 04:02 PM (11 years ago)
(m)
Quote from: harold634 on 15-03-2011 03:56 PM
Quote from: trolling on 15-03-2011 03:47 PM
Quote from: truenaija2 on 15-03-2011 03:42 PM
@trolling at that time it was no adultery but now its adultery as incest was no sin and later became sin NB: i understand the bible very well
so this is what i have to say to you read Ex 21:10 and tell me what you come up with.....in the nearest future when 7 women will marry a single man,will you call that adultery? one more thing truenaija your hands are too short to box and I dont engage in cyber-warfare.
I'm parallelling Exodus 21:10 with Isaiah 4,it is the same thing,in Exodus it talks about if a man decides to have more than one wife,then in Isaiah 4,HE talks about a man having more than one wife,aint 7 women more than one woman,so what the heck are you talking about?

POINT OF CORRECTION EX 21:10 DOES NOT TALK ABOUT 7 WOMEN MARRYING ONE MAN. IT IS ISAIAH 4:1
Posted: at 15-03-2011 04:02 PM (11 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- pholake at 15-03-2011 04:03 PM (11 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: divineproject on 15-03-2011 04:00 PM
And I didnt know that a concubine has become the same thing as a legitimately married woman...........

My sister, in the end time, false prophets shall rise
Posted: at 15-03-2011 04:03 PM (11 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- trolling at 15-03-2011 04:03 PM (11 years ago)
(m)
I'm parallelling Exodus 21:10 with Isaiah 4,it is the same thing,in Exodus it talks about if a man decides to have more than one wife,then in Isaiah 4,HE talks about a man having more than one wife,aint 7 women more than one woman,so what the heck are you talking about?
Posted: at 15-03-2011 04:03 PM (11 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- harold634 at 15-03-2011 04:04 PM (11 years ago)
(m)
Quote from: pholake on 15-03-2011 04:01 PM
Quote from: harold634 on 15-03-2011 03:56 PM
Quote from: trolling on 15-03-2011 03:47 PM
Quote from: truenaija2 on 15-03-2011 03:42 PM
@trolling at that time it was no adultery but now its adultery as incest was no sin and later became sin NB: i understand the bible very well
so this is what i have to say to you read Ex 21:10 and tell me what you come up with.....in the nearest future when 7 women will marry a single man,will you call that adultery? one more thing truenaija your hands are too short to box and I dont engage in cyber-warfare.


POINT OF CORRECTION EX 21:10 DOES NOT TALK ABOUT 7 WOMEN MARRYING ONE MAN. IT IS ISAIAH 4:1

thanks for exposing him Harrold.....how's madam?

MADAM IS VERY FINE. THANK U.
Posted: at 15-03-2011 04:04 PM (11 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- truenaija2 at 15-03-2011 04:04 PM (11 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: sweetmother on 15-03-2011 04:02 PM
@flymamacita my twins are same age as u.They dont dare to talk to elders of my age this way.Thruenaija is right, its not good.
As for ur comment, nowhere in bible u can find that a woman is a slave to her man.so let men be slaves for us then.In my home its 50/50.


 dont b angry sweetmother mayb she didnt mean it thta way sorry about that
Posted: at 15-03-2011 04:04 PM (11 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- MissyBarbie at 15-03-2011 04:05 PM (11 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: simele on 15-03-2011 02:05 PM
Quote from: MissyBarbie on 15-03-2011 12:50 PM
Q1. None
Q2. Yeah buh to some extent
Q3. She might and she might not, its depends
Q4. Hmmmmm yeah buh not 100% submission

I dey come sha.

not hw long a man spend have sex with woman that she will give birth to twice

 Huh? Huh? Huh? Huh? Huh? Huh? Huh?
Posted: at 15-03-2011 04:05 PM (11 years ago) | Hero
Reply
- pholake at 15-03-2011 04:05 PM (11 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: sweetmother on 15-03-2011 04:02 PM
@flymamacita my twins are same age as u.They dont dare to talk to elders of my age this way.Thruenaija is right, its not good.
As for ur comment, nowhere in bible u can find that a woman is a slave to her man.so let men be slaves for us then.In my home its 50/50.

I love the 50-50 thing...no master, no servant.........both respect, both love
Posted: at 15-03-2011 04:05 PM (11 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- FlyMamacita at 15-03-2011 04:05 PM (11 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: truenaija2 on 15-03-2011 03:50 PM
Quote from: FlyMamacita on 15-03-2011 03:48 PM
Quote from: sweetmother on 15-03-2011 03:42 PM
Maybe its time , men start being submissive to their women, since its a modern world,we live in 2011, not stone age.

crase dey worry u.... u wan make a new edition of d Bible too ? abeg ooo


@flymamcita dat woman has grown up children ooh its not right to talk to a woman of her age like tht ooh
am sorry but i am not takin it back.... it is bcos of thoughts like dat d world is standin upside down
Posted: at 15-03-2011 04:05 PM (11 years ago) | Addicted Hero
Reply
- divineproject at 15-03-2011 04:06 PM (11 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: pholake on 15-03-2011 03:59 PM
Quote from: trolling on 15-03-2011 03:47 PM
Quote from: truenaija2 on 15-03-2011 03:42 PM
@trolling at that time it was no adultery but now its adultery as incest was no sin and later became sin NB: i understand the bible very well
so this is what i have to say to you read Ex 21:10 and tell me what you come up with.....in the nearest future when 7 women will marry a single man,will you call that adultery? one more thing truenaija your hands are too short to box and I dont engage in cyber-warfare.

Since the time that has been written, that time has not come.........and it shan't in the nearest future......my advise: don't get married until me and other 6 women are ready to fight tooth and nail to marry u

Good advice for him dearie..............let him wait till then...........

Posted: at 15-03-2011 04:06 PM (11 years ago) | Hero
Reply
- pholake at 15-03-2011 04:07 PM (11 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: harold634 on 15-03-2011 04:04 PM
Quote from: pholake on 15-03-2011 04:01 PM
Quote from: harold634 on 15-03-2011 03:56 PM
Quote from: trolling on 15-03-2011 03:47 PM
Quote from: truenaija2 on 15-03-2011 03:42 PM
@trolling at that time it was no adultery but now its adultery as incest was no sin and later became sin NB: i understand the bible very well
so this is what i have to say to you read Ex 21:10 and tell me what you come up with.....in the nearest future when 7 women will marry a single man,will you call that adultery? one more thing truenaija your hands are too short to box and I dont engage in cyber-warfare.


POINT OF CORRECTION EX 21:10 DOES NOT TALK ABOUT 7 WOMEN MARRYING ONE MAN. IT IS ISAIAH 4:1

thanks for exposing him Harrold.....how's madam?

MADAM IS VERY FINE. THANK U.

u're welcome......pls greet her for me and tell her she should put her mind @ rest o, that no six women would come and join her in ur house...... Grin
Posted: at 15-03-2011 04:07 PM (11 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- estilizo at 15-03-2011 04:08 PM (11 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: divineproject on 15-03-2011 03:57 PM
Quote from: trolling on 15-03-2011 03:52 PM
Quote from: divineproject on 15-03-2011 03:43 PM
Quote from: trolling on 15-03-2011 03:33 PM
Quote from: divineproject on 15-03-2011 03:20 PM
Does the same bible you are quoting now subscribe to having concubine? which automatically can be linked to [email protected]
MAKE YOU READ EX 21:10, THEN TELL ME WHAT YOU GET FROM IT.AS YOU READ BIBLE REACH YOU NO READ ABOUT MEN WEY GET CONCUBINES.

In the old testament time, God allowed them more than one wife.......but when Jesus came, He said ONE MAN ONE WIFE.........old testament man.............
where do you get old testament from,did your pastor tell you that there is anything called old testament,didnt He say He is the same yesterday,today and forever, didnt He also say I change not.... ok if that is old why did Isaiah say 7 women will marry one man,if it is an old practice.Read your book dont surmise to me.

WETIN na?...........is the bible not divided into old and new testament?......
i just tire sef.....

Posted: at 15-03-2011 04:08 PM (11 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- trolling at 15-03-2011 04:10 PM (11 years ago)
(m)
Quote from: divineproject on 15-03-2011 04:06 PM
Quote from: pholake on 15-03-2011 03:59 PM
Quote from: trolling on 15-03-2011 03:47 PM
Quote from: truenaija2 on 15-03-2011 03:42 PM
@trolling at that time it was no adultery but now its adultery as incest was no sin and later became sin NB: i understand the bible very well
so this is what i have to say to you read Ex 21:10 and tell me what you come up with.....in the nearest future when 7 women will marry a single man,will you call that adultery? one more thing truenaija your hands are too short to box and I dont engage in cyber-warfare.

Since the time that has been written, that time has not come.........and it shan't in the nearest future......my advise: don't get married until me and other 6 women are ready to fight tooth and nail to marry u

Good advice for him dearie..............let him wait till then...........
Natural marriage aint for me,I'm already spiritually married,that is if you understand what i mean,and since you say that time shan't come,then you are calling God a liarer.
Posted: at 15-03-2011 04:10 PM (11 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- FlyMamacita at 15-03-2011 04:10 PM (11 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: sweetmother on 15-03-2011 04:02 PM
@flymamacita my twins are same age as u.They dont dare to talk to elders of my age this way.Thruenaija is right, its not good.
As for ur comment, nowhere in bible u can find that a woman is a slave to her man.so let men be slaves for us then.In my home its 50/50.
Well if u r d age of my mother, i am suprised bcos i neva heard my mother speak such RUBBISH!

U see there u go again talkin abt slave,, bein submissive has nottin to do with bein a slave....
If ur home works out like dat i am happy for u my dear, but i still follow d Bible, thank u

Posted: at 15-03-2011 04:10 PM (11 years ago) | Addicted Hero
Reply
1 ... 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 ... 28