MAN JAILED FOR HAVING SEX WITH A GOAT.

Date: 18-08-2011 8:44 am (12 years ago) | Author: Stan N. (Waco Janta)
- at 18-08-2011 08:44 AM (12 years ago)
(m)
Have u ever been to Bauchi State?
One thing common in this state is various
types of diseases that there names are yet to be known.

 NOW I KNOW WHY! YET, these are the people shouting sharia! sharia!!

                                 READ THIS

A middle-aged man, Nasiru Ishaku, was, on Tuesday, sentenced to a six-month jail by a Bauchi chief magistrates’ court, for having segxwal intercourse with a she-goat.

Ishaku, who resides at Nassarawa quarters of Bauchi metroplis, was charged before chief magistrate, Isa Mohammed, by the police, for committing unnatural offence and mischief, by maiming an animal, which the police prosecutor, Abdul Ishaku, said was contrary to sections 284 and 330 of the Penal Code Laws.

The she-goat, according to the police prosecutor, belonged to one Mallam Bala of Federal Low Cost Housing Estate, Bauchi, adding that the animal, valued at N20,000, was rendered useless after the segxwal act.

When the charges were read to the accused, the presiding judge asked him if he understood them, to which he answered in the affirmative.

He confessed that he truly committed the offence and pleaded with the court to have mercy on him.

Delivering his judgment, the magistrate ordered the accused to pay the owner of the goat the sum of N20,000, being the cost of the animal and, thereby, sentenced him to six months in prison, with an option of fine of N5,000.



Posted: at 18-08-2011 08:44 AM (12 years ago) | Hero
- kebella at 18-08-2011 09:09 AM (12 years ago)
(f)
tufiakwa...........ndi awusa abughi mmadu oo ........ Sad Shocked Shocked

Posted: at 18-08-2011 09:09 AM (12 years ago) | Addicted Hero
Reply
- emmanuel500 at 18-08-2011 09:30 AM (12 years ago)
(m)
 Grin
Posted: at 18-08-2011 09:30 AM (12 years ago) | Newbie
Reply
- emmanuel500 at 18-08-2011 09:31 AM (12 years ago)
(m)
Quote from: waco on 18-08-2011 08:44 AM
Have u ever been to Bauchi State?
One thing common in this state is various
types of diseases that there names are yet to be known.

 NOW I KNOW WHY! YET, these are the people shouting sharia! sharia!!

                                 READ THIS

A middle-aged man, Nasiru Ishaku, was, on Tuesday, sentenced to a six-month jail by a Bauchi chief magistrates’ court, for having segxwal intercourse with a she-goat.

Ishaku, who resides at Nassarawa quarters of Bauchi metroplis, was charged before chief magistrate, Isa Mohammed, by the police, for committing unnatural offence and mischief, by maiming an animal, which the police prosecutor, Abdul Ishaku, said was contrary to sections 284 and 330 of the Penal Code Laws.

The she-goat, according to the police prosecutor, belonged to one Mallam Bala of Federal Low Cost Housing Estate, Bauchi, adding that the animal, valued at N20,000, was rendered useless after the segxwal act.

When the charges were read to the accused, the presiding judge asked him if he understood them, to which he answered in the affirmative.

He confessed that he truly committed the offence and pleaded with the court to have mercy on him.

Delivering his judgment, the magistrate ordered the accused to pay the owner of the goat the sum of N20,000, being the cost of the animal and, thereby, sentenced him to six months in prison, with an option of fine of N5,000.


Grin
Posted: at 18-08-2011 09:31 AM (12 years ago) | Newbie
Reply
- CammyWhite at 18-08-2011 02:09 PM (12 years ago)
(f)
And if I say, "Only in Nigeria", would I be called racist? Because when the case of the man who had sex with a horse was posted here, someone said, "Only in America". Or is racism OK when the targets are Caucasian?
Posted: at 18-08-2011 02:09 PM (12 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- HOPEA23 at 18-08-2011 03:59 PM (12 years ago)
(f)
don't say only in nigeria but in that state it occur

Posted: at 18-08-2011 03:59 PM (12 years ago) | Addicted Hero
Reply
- D9ja at 18-11-2011 06:23 PM (12 years ago)
(m)
na wah for dat north oh, nortin we nor go hear
Posted: at 18-11-2011 06:23 PM (12 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- mallorca at 18-11-2011 06:34 PM (12 years ago)
(m)
Quote from: kebella on 18-08-2011 09:09 AM
tufiakwa...........ndi awusa abughi mmadu oo ........ Sad Shocked Shocked
:'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'( :'(

Posted: at 18-11-2011 06:34 PM (12 years ago) | Addicted Hero
Reply
- ALAIGBOAMAKA at 9-12-2011 12:28 PM (12 years ago)
(m)
Any other nationality can comment on this issue, but Americans no. Cause few days back. The united state of America just pass a bill allowing the military men to rap animals.
Posted: at 9-12-2011 12:28 PM (12 years ago) | Newbie
Reply
- alelove at 9-12-2011 12:56 PM (12 years ago)
(f)
 Shocked Shocked Shocked
Posted: at 9-12-2011 12:56 PM (12 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- CammyWhite at 9-12-2011 02:04 PM (12 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: ALAIGBOAMAKA on  9-12-2011 12:28 PM
Any other nationality can comment on this issue, but Americans no. Cause few days back. The united state of America just pass a bill allowing the military men to rap animals.

You are joking, right?
Posted: at 9-12-2011 02:04 PM (12 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- ALAIGBOAMAKA at 9-12-2011 02:06 PM (12 years ago)
(m)
Sweety am not.
Posted: at 9-12-2011 02:06 PM (12 years ago) | Newbie
Reply
- rayOFsunshine at 9-12-2011 02:11 PM (12 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: ALAIGBOAMAKA on  9-12-2011 12:28 PM
Any other nationality can comment on this issue, but Americans no. Cause few days back. The united state of America just pass a bill allowing the military men to rap animals.

When i told someone i heard this same news over the radio this morning, the person disbelieved me
hmmm
wonders would never end
Posted: at 9-12-2011 02:11 PM (12 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- ALAIGBOAMAKA at 9-12-2011 02:15 PM (12 years ago)
(m)
Quote from: CammyWhite on  9-12-2011 02:04 PM
You are joking, right?


On Nov. 15, the Senate Armed Services Committee had unanimously approved S. 1867, the National Defense Authorization Act, which includes a provision to repeal Article 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).
Article 125 of the UCMJ makes it illegal to engage in both sodomy with humans and sex with animals.
 
It states: "(a) Any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy. Penetration, however slight, is sufficient to complete the offense. (b) Any person found guilty of sodomy shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.”
Family Research Council President Tony Perkins said the effort to remove sodomy from military law stems from liberal Senate Democrats' and President Obama’s support for removing the military’s Don’t Ask Don’t Tell policy.
 
“It’s all about using the military to advance this administration’s radical social agenda,” Perkins told CNSNews.com. “Not only did they overturn Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, but they had another problem, and that is, under military law sodomy is illegal, just as adultery is illegal, so they had to remove that prohibition against sodomy.”
Perkins said removing the bestiality provision may have been intentional--or just “collateral damage”
“Well, whether it was inadvertent or not, they have also taken out the provision against bestiality,” he said. “So now, under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), there’s nothing there to prosecute bestiality."
 
Former Army Col. Bob Maginnis said some military lawyers have indicated that bestiality may be prosecutable under another section of the military code of justice – the “catch-all” Article 134 for offenses against “good military order and discipline.”
But don't count on that, he said.
“If we have a soldier who engages in sodomy with an animal – whether a government animal or a non-government animal – is it, in fact, a chargeable offense under the Uniform Code? I think that’s in question,” Maginnis told CNSNews.com.
 
“When the reader stops laughing, the reader needs to ask the question whether or not this is in the best interests of the government, in the best
interests of the military and the best interests of the country? I think not.”
He added: “Soldiers, unfortunately, like it or not, have engaged in this type of behavior in the past. Will they in the future, if they remove this statute? I don’t know.”
 
Perkins said there was no attempt to remove the UCMJ repeal provision from the bill, which Perkins had expected the Senate to approve.
Now that it has passed, however, the Senate version will have to go to a conference committee, and Perkins predicts there will be several sticking points with the House.
“The House in their version of the defense authorization, reinforced the Defense of Marriage Act, saying that there is a military DOMA as well, prohibiting same-sex marriage on military bases – something the Department of Defense is pushing for,” he said.
 
“And now this is an added concern, that sodomy has been removed, and as we have discovered, that bestiality--the prohibition against it--has been removed from the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So yes, the House will have problems with this bill.
Posted: at 9-12-2011 02:15 PM (12 years ago) | Newbie
Reply
- Ajento at 9-12-2011 08:36 PM (12 years ago)
(m)
I was thinking that this Hausa people are just stupid, now I know they are more than stupid, they useless. That's how they manufacture all kinds of diseases.
Posted: at 9-12-2011 08:36 PM (12 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- CammyWhite at 9-12-2011 10:46 PM (12 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: ALAIGBOAMAKA on  9-12-2011 02:15 PM

On Nov. 15, the Senate Armed Services Committee had unanimously approved S. 1867, the National Defense Authorization Act, which includes a provision to repeal Article 125 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ).
Article 125 of the UCMJ makes it illegal to engage in both sodomy with humans and sex with animals.
 
It states: "(a) Any person subject to this chapter who engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy. Penetration, however slight, is sufficient to complete the offense. (b) Any person found guilty of sodomy shall be punished as a court-martial may direct.”
Family Research Council President Tony Perkins said the effort to remove sodomy from military law stems from liberal Senate Democrats' and President Obama’s support for removing the military’s Don’t Ask Don’t Tell policy.
 
“It’s all about using the military to advance this administration’s radical social agenda,” Perkins told CNSNews.com. “Not only did they overturn Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, but they had another problem, and that is, under military law sodomy is illegal, just as adultery is illegal, so they had to remove that prohibition against sodomy.”
Perkins said removing the bestiality provision may have been intentional--or just “collateral damage”
“Well, whether it was inadvertent or not, they have also taken out the provision against bestiality,” he said. “So now, under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), there’s nothing there to prosecute bestiality."
 
Former Army Col. Bob Maginnis said some military lawyers have indicated that bestiality may be prosecutable under another section of the military code of justice – the “catch-all” Article 134 for offenses against “good military order and discipline.”
But don't count on that, he said.
“If we have a soldier who engages in sodomy with an animal – whether a government animal or a non-government animal – is it, in fact, a chargeable offense under the Uniform Code? I think that’s in question,” Maginnis told CNSNews.com.
 
“When the reader stops laughing, the reader needs to ask the question whether or not this is in the best interests of the government, in the best
interests of the military and the best interests of the country? I think not.”
He added: “Soldiers, unfortunately, like it or not, have engaged in this type of behavior in the past. Will they in the future, if they remove this statute? I don’t know.”
 
Perkins said there was no attempt to remove the UCMJ repeal provision from the bill, which Perkins had expected the Senate to approve.
Now that it has passed, however, the Senate version will have to go to a conference committee, and Perkins predicts there will be several sticking points with the House.
“The House in their version of the defense authorization, reinforced the Defense of Marriage Act, saying that there is a military DOMA as well, prohibiting same-sex marriage on military bases – something the Department of Defense is pushing for,” he said.
 
“And now this is an added concern, that sodomy has been removed, and as we have discovered, that bestiality--the prohibition against it--has been removed from the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So yes, the House will have problems with this bill.

Not true, you'll be glad/sorry to know:

WASHINGTON — Just in case you weren’t sure, bestiality is still illegal in the U.S. military.

And, yes, that issue was actually in question this week. For the past few days, White House and Pentagon officials have fielded uncomfortable queries on whether they are working to decriminalize sex with animals as part of efforts to update the Uniform Code of Military Justice.

In fact, Congress is poised to remove from the books the only specific reference to bestiality contained in the UCMJ. The obscure deletion, contained in the massive Defense Appropriations bill now being finalized, raised the ire of some conservative groups still outraged over the repeal of the “don’t ask, don’t tell” law that allowed homosegxwals to serve openly in the military.

For their part, Pentagon officials say the deletion of bestiality is a legal technicality and does not represent any fundamental change in the military’s moral code for servicemembers (and service animals).

“The department’s position on this issue remains unchanged and that act remains illegal,” said defense spokesman Lt. Col Todd Breasseale.

The issue traces back to the 2004 Supreme Court case knocking down state anti-sodomy laws, a ruling which riled conservative groups. Despite that, anti-sodomy regulations remained in the UCMJ as officials worked to update sex crimes statutes.

Military officials have now asked Congress to drop the anti-sodomy language from the UCMJ. But that article of the military code doesn’t just include humans, and that’s where the confusion begins.

Article 125 actually states that any servicemember who “engages in unnatural carnal copulation with another person of the same sex or opposite sex or with an animal is guilty of sodomy.” Offenders face court-martial for any violations.

Cue various conservative groups and bloggers, who promptly attempted to link the recent “don’t ask, don’t tell” repeal with this apparent evidence that the military now accepts bestiality — a comparison that military officials this week blasted as false and offensive.

In a recent online post titled “Bestiality Should Give Leaders Paws,” the Family Research Council called the sex with animals confusion proof that the “don’t ask, don’t tell” repeal was done too hastily.

Then, at a White House press briefing this week, Les Kinsolving, a correspondent for the conservative WorldNetDaily, asked White House spokesman Jay Carney: “Does the commander in chief approve or disapprove of bestiality in our armed forces?”

Carney laughed off the question and refused to answer, which in turn prompted a stinging rebuke from People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.

“With respect, this is no laughing matter,” wrote PETA spokesman Colleen O’Brien. “Animal abuse does not affect animals only — it is also a matter of public safety, as people who abuse animals very often go on to abuse human beings. I hope that in the future, you will address important issues with sensitivity and not dismiss them with a joke.”

Lobbyists from the far left and far right don’t often agree on much, but apparently sex with animals can bring them together.

But Breasseale said the whole controversy is off-base.

Even if Article 125 is removed, the UCMJ contains provisions under which troops can be punished. Article 134, for example, forbids “all disorders and neglects to the prejudice of good order and discipline in the armed forces” and “all conduct of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces.” Breasseale said that would cover any and all animal abuse.

In fact, past instances of bestiality in the military have been prosecuted under that statute, instead of Article 125. The legal record dates back to 1957, when Pvt. Ricardo Sanchez was convicted of “an indecent act with an animal” under Article 134, even without specific wording prohibiting sex with animals.

In addition, before the potential language changes reached Congress, the Joint Service Committee on Military Justice drafted a list of punitive offenses under the UCMJ which specifically includes animal abuse. That is set to be included in the Manual for Courts-Martial, and will give clear guidance on what to do in such cases.

Breasseale said the change pending before Congress is truly just a legal clean-up effort, and will in no way endanger animals.

“It is difficult to envision a situation where a servicemember engages in segxwal conduct with an animal that would not be conduct prejudicial to good order and discipline or service-discrediting,” he said.

[email protected]

Posted: at 9-12-2011 10:46 PM (12 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply