KONY 2012 EXPOSE :say no to another drum war in africa (Page 2)

Date: 09-03-2012 2:27 pm (8 years ago) | Author: ahmed nda
1 [2] 3
- CammyWhite at 17-03-2012 12:28 AM (8 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: Norred on 16-03-2012 09:09 PM
The evil dark witch from the North is sitting on it and hey tell your bro Santorum to get a grip*

I don't know anything about Santorum. I'm not an American.
Posted: at 17-03-2012 12:28 AM (8 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- soyayya at 17-03-2012 06:56 AM (8 years ago)
(m)
i miss quote the figures,but it should be around %60,
and by the way what do you know about africa or your australian medias only tell you histories about ancient egyptian being light skin people?
no lies but i live and travel some part of africa and when it comes to reality what has happen and continue happening to africa by the white men since 500yrs ago till today,only africans can tell you the real hidden tragedy because u cant get that from ur western medias because they re the root and the hidden hands which media will never expose,
do u know right now your so call australia government have special intelligence gathering team in nigeria zimbabwe and sudan with many CIA MOSSAD TEAM in africa?
doing what?find out yourself and i guess you re hearing this from me for the first time because u all white dont know the evils ur government have done and continue to do to black race,some white are beginning to see the truth and are writing books to expose them,what about u and what re u doing?or u rather join the evil team and defend lies because they look just like u,let me help u name few real source of info,veteranstoday.com finalcall.com infowars.com in us, rt.com russia today, presstv.ir in iran,
peace cammy.
Posted: at 17-03-2012 06:56 AM (8 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- CammyWhite at 17-03-2012 07:08 AM (8 years ago)
(f)
You have your sources; I have mine. You choose what you want to believe, just as I do. It's clear to me, though, that you are ready only to believe the worst about the west.

The Final Call serves the ends of Farrakhan's Nation of Islam. I put it on the same level as Stormfront.

Infowars serves to push Alex Jones' paranoid fantasies. It's not to be trusted.

Anything sanctioned by the Iranian government has no credibility.
Posted: at 17-03-2012 07:08 AM (8 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- williams100 at 17-03-2012 10:30 AM (8 years ago)
(m)
hahahahaha,ROFLMAO.....
I really didn't want to comment on this but i guess i will have to as i have been following up on the topic for quite a while now.

from your quotes below:
Quote from: CammyWhite on 17-03-2012 07:08 AM
You have your sources; I have mine. You choose what you want to believe, just as I do.
So someone is finally getting the big picture on that prospect.it's very good that it's finally sinking in...

Quote from: CammyWhite on 17-03-2012 07:08 AM
It's clear to me, though, that you are ready only to believe the worst about the west.
Hang on there,you mean you want him to only believe, though it's hard for me to spill out,the goody-goody of the west like they are some kind of charitable organisation or perhaps a relief agency?thereby neglecting the bad deeds done by them?be it clear please,the western government's foreign policy is what is been rebuffed and condemned here and not the general populace of the western people.should i consider such logic as a scuffle?guess i will have to check again!

Quote from: CammyWhite on 17-03-2012 07:08 AM
The Final Call serves the ends of Farrakhan's Nation of Islam. I put it on the same level as Stormfront.
You know what they say about truth?Is that truth is always stranger than fiction......

Quote from: CammyWhite on 17-03-2012 07:08 AM
Infowars serves to push Alex Jones' paranoid fantasies. It's not to be trusted.

Anything sanctioned by the Iranian government has no credibility.
Wait a minute,did you just say that?
And of course,the west's media(s) and sources are not of paranoid fantasies and they can be trusted cause they have 100% credibility right?but unfortunately for sources outside their circles,don't.is this comment not in a clear contradiction to the previous one above?in order to get exclusive insight and intel,an individual ought to pay attention to news,sites,sources etc from not just the west alone but from east,north and south if possible...relying on one part of the world's sources makes one more vulnerable to "static ideology" about other parts of the world....

Hey,ever heard of DEBKA FILES and STRATFOR....?If you haven't,do yourself an enormous favour and start digging some of their declassified intels and see for yourself okay.
BTW-a clue for an upfront notice,one is an american source and the other an isreali source.thought you should know that,happy hunting!
Posted: at 17-03-2012 10:30 AM (8 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- soyayya at 17-03-2012 04:34 PM (8 years ago)
(m)
well said my brother,
and to cammywhite i feel sorry for you because no matter how u lie or defend lies u will always be the loser,
truth shall prevail and justice will be done from the almighty god.
Posted: at 17-03-2012 04:34 PM (8 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- CammyWhite at 18-03-2012 01:16 AM (8 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: williams100 on 17-03-2012 10:30 AM
hahahahaha,ROFLMAO.....
I really didn't want to comment on this but i guess i will have to as i have been following up on the topic for quite a while now.

from your quotes below:So someone is finally getting the big picture on that prospect.it's very good that it's finally sinking in...
Hang on there,you mean you want him to only believe, though it's hard for me to spill out,the goody-goody of the west like they are some kind of charitable organisation or perhaps a relief agency?thereby neglecting the bad deeds done by them?be it clear please,the western government's foreign policy is what is been rebuffed and condemned here and not the general populace of the western people.should i consider such logic as a scuffle?guess i will have to check again!
You know what they say about truth?Is that truth is always stranger than fiction......
Wait a minute,did you just say that?
And of course,the west's media(s) and sources are not of paranoid fantasies and they can be trusted cause they have 100% credibility right?but unfortunately for sources outside their circles,don't.is this comment not in a clear contradiction to the previous one above?in order to get exclusive insight and intel,an individual ought to pay attention to news,sites,sources etc from not just the west alone but from east,north and south if possible...relying on one part of the world's sources makes one more vulnerable to "static ideology" about other parts of the world....

Hey,ever heard of DEBKA FILES and STRATFOR....?If you haven't,do yourself an enormous favour and start digging some of their declassified intels and see for yourself okay.
BTW-a clue for an upfront notice,one is an american source and the other an isreali source.thought you should know that,happy hunting!

You're a real black/white thinker - as in, if I don't agree that the West is the quintessential evil, then I must think that the West is the ultimate good. Don't be such a sodding idiot!

Quote
You know what they say about truth?Is that truth is always stranger than fiction......

Only sometimes. More often the truth is quite simple and direct. There are people out there who hate the truth because it undermines ther belief that events are manipulated by hidden forces.

Quote
And of course,the west's media(s) and sources are not of paranoid fantasies and they can be trusted cause they have 100% credibility right?

Which I never said, I might add. You love putting words in my mouth. Don't do it, you jerk!

The Government of Iran is virulently anti-West and controlled by the Mullahs. You might as well trust the DPRK's media.

And here's a wondrous thing about the blogosphere... you can say anything you like in it and people like Williams 100 and Soyayya will cherry-pick what they want. Why not quote David Icke?

But I will say that having browsed through Debka Files and Stratfor that they're not anything like those lurid crap-sites given before.
Posted: at 18-03-2012 01:16 AM (8 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- CammyWhite at 18-03-2012 01:20 AM (8 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: soyayya on 17-03-2012 04:34 PM
well said my brother,
and to cammywhite i feel sorry for you because no matter how u lie or defend lies u will always be the loser,
truth shall prevail and justice will be done from the almighty god.

You're entitled to your own views, but not your own facts.
Posted: at 18-03-2012 01:20 AM (8 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- CammyWhite at 18-03-2012 01:32 AM (8 years ago)
(f)
Additional; here's something about STRATFOR.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2012/mar/01/stratfor-wikileaks-obama-administration

Especially this:

Quote
WikiLeaks, the whistleblower website, has again published a massive trove of documents, this time from a private intelligence firm known as Stratfor. The source of the leak was the hacker group Anonymous, which took credit for obtaining more than 5m emails from Stratfor's servers. Anonymous obtained the material on 24 December 2011, and provided it to WikiLeaks, which, in turn, partnered with 25 media organizations globally to analyze the emails and publish them.

Among the emails was a short one-liner that suggested the US government has produced, through a secret grand jury, a sealed indictment against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange. In addition to painting a picture of Stratfor as a runaway, rogue private intelligence firm with close ties to government-intelligence agencies serving both corporate and US military clients, the emails support the growing awareness that the Obama administration, far from diverging from the secrecy of the Bush/Cheney era, is obsessed with secrecy, and is aggressively opposed to transparency.


Quote
The Stratfor emails will be released over time, along with context provided by WikiLeaks' media partners. Already revealed by the documents are the close, and potentially illegal, connections between Stratfor employees and government-intelligence and law-enforcement officials. Rolling Stone magazine reports that the US Department of Homeland Security was monitoring Occupy Wall Street protests nationally, and the Texas Department of Public Safety has an undercover agent at Occupy Austin who was disclosing information to contacts at Stratfor.

Stratfor also is hired by multinational corporations to glean "intelligence" about critics. Among companies using Stratfor were Dow Chemical, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Raytheon and Coca-Cola.

Fred Burton, Stratfor's vice-president of intelligence, and a former head of counterintelligence at the US State Department's diplomatic corps, wrote in an email, "Not for Pub – We have a sealed indictment on Assange. Pls protect." Burton and others at Stratfor showed intense interest in WikiLeaks starting in 2010, showing intense dislike for Assange personally. Burton allegedly wrote: "Assange is going to make a nice bride in prison. Screw the terrorist. He'll be eating cat food forever." According to another leaked email, a Stratfor employee wanted Assange waterboarded. In a statement, Stratfor would neither confirm nor deny the provenance of the leaked material.


Any comment would be superfluous.
Posted: at 18-03-2012 01:32 AM (8 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- soyayya at 18-03-2012 08:38 AM (8 years ago)
(m)
so ur source of info is from a control uk media? we see u,
by the way cammy why insulting someone calling him a sodding idiot a jerk because u are badly  hurt by someone telling the truth...you can do better than this,dont be a looser,
Posted: at 18-03-2012 08:38 AM (8 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- CammyWhite at 19-03-2012 08:38 AM (8 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: soyayya on 18-03-2012 08:38 AM
so ur source of info is from a control uk media? we see u,
by the way cammy why insulting someone calling him a sodding idiot a jerk because u are badly  hurt by someone telling the truth...you can do better than this,dont be a looser,

I called someone a sodding idiot because he's being a blinkered fool who's misrepresenting me. He wasn't telling the truth; he was telling a blatant lie about how I see the world. So that comment about being "badly hurt by someone telling the truth" is sodding idiotic too.
Posted: at 19-03-2012 08:38 AM (8 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- williams100 at 20-03-2012 01:03 PM (8 years ago)
(m)
@Cammywhite

Am sure you know the etymology of your moniker?cause that's exactly what you just displayed.
However,I am not known to be a black/white thinker or perhaps a sodding idiot or maybe a jerk and i sincerely hope you are not!
Actually,I thought my hierarchical statement would have help to emancipate your static ideology of a one-way street thinking,guess it just metamorphosed into the outburst of temperamental fury and further precipitated into profanity.it's crystally clear that LOGIC takes the back seat in your world of communication.otherwise,COURTESY would have dictated to you,do not ABUSE but to proffer sagacious prudence of rationality.but it's quite the opposite which is nothing but a mere reflection of a No-brainer!
   Unlike You,I don't get worked up easily,that is why am going to continue to employ thorough lucidity towards my response.at least for now!.any further repulsive remark,will prompt me to respond with kind.you don't know the meaning of the comment you pasted and yet,you had the impetus to lash at me with foul languages as if you are a.        .?still skimming through the world of lexicon in search for an appropriate term to best describe this erratic behaviour you just exhibited.
  Your comment is an embarrassment to sane westerners and a disgrace to world of communication.I just can't fathom how/why you weren't able to use your grey matter every blue moon.seems it didn't ring a bell now did it.?
   Am going to make a first and last warning here now so LISTEN UP-
                      (1)If you want us to continue in the aisle of constructive communication devoid of insults,then we better trade by barter with professional courtesy.
                      (2)If arrogance and profanity are your virtues and specialty,then it's best we cease conversating with each other here on Naijapals without poking nose in each other's comment whatsoever!.
                       (3)If you also know/think that your dehumanising verbal utterances's skills is strong and tough enough,then i urge you to proceed by all means neccessary.
                                                         Take Your Pick!!!
Posted: at 20-03-2012 01:03 PM (8 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- williams100 at 20-03-2012 01:20 PM (8 years ago)
(m)
Quote from: CammyWhite on 18-03-2012 01:16 AM

The Government of Iran is virulently anti-West and controlled by the Mullahs. You might as well trust the DPRK's media.
While the govt of the so called west is not virulently anti-iran?no? thought these same western government were the ones that have sanctioned Iran since 1979 starting with their civilian aviation industry.So good of the west!!.where the hell did that Gobbledygook about DPRK's media came from?
Posted: at 20-03-2012 01:20 PM (8 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- williams100 at 20-03-2012 01:23 PM (8 years ago)
(m)
Quote from: CammyWhite on 19-03-2012 08:38 AM
I called someone a sodding idiot because he's being a blinkered fool who's misrepresenting me. He wasn't telling the truth; he was telling a blatant lie about how I see the world. So that comment about being "badly hurt by someone telling the truth" is sodding idiotic too.

Aside from the insults,do you still think you can focus?
Or you no longer know the meaning of online etiquette?
Posted: at 20-03-2012 01:23 PM (8 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- CammyWhite at 20-03-2012 01:31 PM (8 years ago)
(f)
You may be smart, you may possess an impressive vocabulary, Williams, but there's a poverty of thought behind it.

FYI my first name is Camille; Cammy is the short version of it. Camille is derived from a Latin word meaning an attendant at a religious ceremony. That first sentence of yours is meaningless.

Quote
However,I am not known to be a black/white thinker or perhaps a sodding idiot or maybe a jerk

I go by what you display. You blatantly misrepresented my thinking and views; hence my reaction.

Quote
Actually,I thought my hierarchical statement would have help to emancipate your static ideology of a one-way street thinking

That's quite impressive. Now say what you actually mean as I am not going to deconstruct it.

Quote
it's crystally clear that LOGIC takes the back seat in your world of communication.otherwise,COURTESY would have dictated to you,do not ABUSE but to proffer sagacious prudence of rationality.but it's quite the opposite which is nothing but a mere reflection of a No-brainer!

It's a two-way street, Williams. If you lie about me, and distort my statements, I will make it clear what I think of your arguments. Also, you speak of a no-brainer, which is (to use a Christian metaphor) like Satan rebuking sin. You seem to think that online trolls and troublemakers plugging destructive agendas are reliable sources. You clearly have no judgement.

Quote
Unlike You,I don't get worked up easily,that is why am going to continue to employ thorough lucidity towards my response.at least for now!.any further repulsive remark,will prompt me to respond with kind.

I'll remember that if ever you forget that little homily and let fly.

Quote
Your comment is an embarrassment to sane westerners and a disgrace to world of communication.I just can't fathom how/why you weren't able to use your grey matter every blue moon.seems it didn't ring a bell now did it.?

Compared to the likes of some posters here (naming no names), I am the soul of restraint and harmony. Compared to most of those who comment on Yahoo news, I'm sweet reason personified. When I use words, I know what they mean.

Quote
Am going to make a first and last warning here now so LISTEN UP

Don't give me that pseudo-tough guy rubbish. You can't carry it off. As it is, your three points are just pointless blather. I'll ignore them.

I'll repay like with like; honesty with honesty. logic with logic, truth with truth. If you and those like you insist on posting baseless rumours and discredited lies, I will point that out.
Posted: at 20-03-2012 01:31 PM (8 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- CammyWhite at 20-03-2012 01:33 PM (8 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: williams100 on 20-03-2012 01:20 PM
While the govt of the so called west is not virulently anti-iran?no? thought these same western government were the ones that have sanctioned Iran since 1979 starting with their civilian aviation industry.So good of the west!!.where the hell did that Gobbledygook about DPRK's media came from?

The DPRK's media serves to propogate the myths of the Kims and the lies of the state. It is nothing more than the organ of deceit.

By the way - there is no such entity as "the govt of the so called west". Look at a map sometime.
Posted: at 20-03-2012 01:33 PM (8 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- CammyWhite at 20-03-2012 01:34 PM (8 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: williams100 on 20-03-2012 01:23 PM
Aside from the insults,do you still think you can focus?
Or you no longer know the meaning of online etiquette?

I don't believe you have any credibilty in the matter of online etiquette.
Posted: at 20-03-2012 01:34 PM (8 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- williams100 at 21-03-2012 08:03 PM (8 years ago)
(m)
Quote from: CammyWhite on 20-03-2012 01:31 PM
You may be smart, you may possess an impressive vocabulary, Williams, but there's a poverty of thought behind it.Poverty of thought you say,is a reflection of your maturity and level of understanding.

FYI my first name is Camille; Cammy is the short version of it. Camille is derived from a Latin word meaning an attendant at a religious ceremony. That first sentence of yours is meaningless.your moniker is cammywhite and it seems very clear you don't know the meaning of such title.did your moniker name read camille?meaningless indeed!

I go by what you display. You blatantly misrepresented my thinking and views; hence my reaction.Really?i ask you simple questions that demand simple answers and you were busy giving me superficial sentimentality and ophobic sarcasm.did some of my comment not carry question mark?if you want to accuse me of something,i think it's best you pay attention to your comment more carefully.take a look at this below

Quote from: CammyWhite on 17-03-2012 07:08 AM
It's clear to me, though, that you are ready only to believe the worst about the west.

Is this not a misrepresentation of thinking and POV from you about that guy?

That's qu'ite impressive. Now say what you actually mean as I am not going to deconstruct it.So the more than one brain cell inside your head was unable to comprehend that statement?pity!the meaning is already in my initial comment.

It's a two-way street, Williams. If you lie about me, and distort my statements, I will make it clear what I think of your arguments. Also, you speak of a no-brainer, which is (to use a Christian metaphor) like Satan rebuking sin. You seem to think that online trolls and troublemakers plugging destructive agendas are reliable sources. You clearly have no judgement.And you think you do by edging into flame wars to pass your message?Here again,you made a wrong statement accusing me of something which according to you i accused you of or misrepresented.take a look at your statement highlighted in red

I'll remember that if ever you forget that little homily and let fly.I guess we'll have to wait and see now won't we?..
Compared to the likes of some posters here (naming no names), I am the soul of restraint and harmony. Compared to most of those who comment on Yahoo news, I'm sweet reason personified. When I use words, I know what they mean.Not quite! cause you aren't perfect.no need for that cocky i-know-it-all attitude bullcrap.it suits no one so don't pull it.

Don't give me that pseudo-tough guy rubbish. You can't carry it off. As it is, your three points are just pointless blather. I'll ignore them.Great!!,at least i know where i stand and what measures/option to take..

I'll repay like with like; honesty with honesty. logic with logic, truth with truth. If you and those like you insist on posting baseless rumours and discredited lies, I will point that out.So you are the one not posting baseless rumours and discredited lies?calling someone initially of only wanting to believe the worst about the west..no?condemning sources from other part of the world as if you are there to really know what's happening and what's not.How hypocritical!.You want to change people's thinking but want yours unchanged.This obviously appears to be fair and balance in your world of reasoning.
Posted: at 21-03-2012 08:03 PM (8 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- williams100 at 21-03-2012 08:05 PM (8 years ago)
(m)
Quote from: CammyWhite on 20-03-2012 01:33 PM
The DPRK's media serves to propogate the myths of the Kims and the lies of the state. It is nothing more than the organ of deceit.What a cheap claim masqueraded as facts to impress/inform who?maybe some brainwashed freaks!

By the way - there is no such entity as "the govt of the so called west". Look at a map sometime.Of course,a mistake on my part gladly accepted into account with humility and not with arrogance or rudeness.A filthy habit that seems to have been your best friend thus far.
Posted: at 21-03-2012 08:05 PM (8 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- williams100 at 21-03-2012 08:31 PM (8 years ago)
(m)

Quote from: CammyWhite on 20-03-2012 01:34 PM
I don't believe you have any credibilty in the matter of online etiquette.

Likewise!, as discussing with you is the equivalent of wrestling with the wind.....

Posted: at 21-03-2012 08:31 PM (8 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- CammyWhite at 22-03-2012 12:27 AM (8 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: williams100 on 21-03-2012 08:03 PM
Is this not a misrepresentation of thinking and POV from you about that guy?

That's qu'ite impressive. Now say what you actually mean as I am not going to deconstruct it.So the more than one brain cell inside your head was unable to comprehend that statement?pity!the meaning is already in my initial comment.

It's a two-way street, Williams. If you lie about me, and distort my statements, I will make it clear what I think of your arguments. Also, you speak of a no-brainer, which is (to use a Christian metaphor) like Satan rebuking sin. You seem to think that online trolls and troublemakers plugging destructive agendas are reliable sources. You clearly have no judgement.And you think you do by edging into flame wars to pass your message?Here again,you made a wrong statement accusing me of something which according to you i accused you of or misrepresented.take a look at your statement highlighted in red

I'll remember that if ever you forget that little homily and let fly.I guess we'll have to wait and see now won't we?..
Compared to the likes of some posters here (naming no names), I am the soul of restraint and harmony. Compared to most of those who comment on Yahoo news, I'm sweet reason personified. When I use words, I know what they mean.Not quite! cause you aren't perfect.no need for that cocky i-know-it-all attitude bullcrap.it suits no one so don't pull it.

Don't give me that pseudo-tough guy rubbish. You can't carry it off. As it is, your three points are just pointless blather. I'll ignore them.Great!!,at least i know where i stand and what measures/option to take..

I'll repay like with like; honesty with honesty. logic with logic, truth with truth. If you and those like you insist on posting baseless rumours and discredited lies, I will point that out.So you are the one not posting baseless rumours and discredited lies?calling someone initially of only wanting to believe the worst about the west..no?condemning sources from other part of the world as if you are there to really know what's happening and what's not.How hypocritical!.You want to change people's thinking but want yours unchanged.This obviously appears to be fair and balance in your world of reasoning.

Quote
So the more than one brain cell inside your head was unable to comprehend that statement?pity!the meaning is already in my initial comment

Well, let's see. Your original phrase was "Actually,I thought my hierarchical statement would have help to emancipate your static ideology of a one-way street thinking". I guess you meant, that what you said would free me from narrow-mindedness. Hey, you could have said that and not baffled most of the readers here who would have had no idea what you were saying. I also don't see the need for "hierarchical" there.

Quote
Here again,you made a wrong statement accusing me of something which according to you i accused you of or misrepresented.
But the sentence "You seem to think that online trolls and troublemakers plugging destructive agendas are reliable sources" is actually fair comment. It's not attacking your intelligence or maturity; just your judgement.

Quote
your moniker is cammywhite and it seems very clear you don't know the meaning of such title.did your moniker name read camille?meaningless indeed!
Cammy is a short version of Camille (like Bill for William) and White is my mother's birth name. It has no meaning really. I don't see your point at all.

Quote
Poverty of thought you say,is a reflection of your maturity and level of understanding.
I have plenty of both, but so far, you have yet to show either in any depth.

Quote
Not quite! cause you aren't perfect.no need for that cocky i-know-it-all attitude bullcrap.it suits no one so don't pull it.
I never claimed perfection. I also never claimed to know everything. You're doing it again.




Posted: at 22-03-2012 12:27 AM (8 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
1 [2] 3