Show Posts
Pages:
1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 ... 20
61  Forum / Politics / Re: Can farida waziri fight curruption? on: 19-08-2009 08:11 PM
Well, anybody that was deceived- prior to the visit of Hillary Cliton to Nigeria- about the new EFCC must be wiser by now. The Waziri EFCC is a flop. It's a national disgrace. We are not the only ones that notice its flaws, the US State Department too does.
62  Forum / Politics / Re: Is Nigeria's vision 2020 a reality or another joke? on: 19-08-2009 08:05 PM
Damn! I love this country and it's kleptocratic rulers. They have many strategems to deceive the gullible masses. Funny enough, for a while now, I ain't heard anything about Vision 20/20. Maybe Yar'Adua and is boys ve realized that it ain't fooling folks anymore.ROFLAO
63  Forum / Politics / Re: Is yar'adua sincerely commited to solving the Niger/delta crisis? on: 19-08-2009 07:40 PM
I'll continue to say Yar'Adua is anything but sincere in his so called quest to solve the Niger Delta cris. If he meant business, Lukman, his minister of Petroleum Resources- a Northerner- will not have said the PTI in Effrun, Delta State will not be upgraded to a Petroleum University(though the Obasanjo Government promised to upgrade it) because they are about to establish a Petroluen University in Kaduna,where there is not even a drop of oil. Yar'Adua is just playing games.
64  Forum / Politics / Re: CAN THE NORTH SURVIVE WITHOUT NIGERDELTA OIL? on: 19-08-2009 07:27 PM
Quote from: Georgeela on 14-08-2009 03:14 PM
Quote from: khadijah on 30-08-2008 08:05 PM
hmmm....in case u never knew notherners are the best and most successful husslers.

who tell u so? maybe hustling mean selling sugar cane and sewing shoes Undecided. Sorry, i never intending insulting Notherners' sensibilities. The fact still remains that because there's oil money now, notherners are behaving as if they are lazy people whereas they are not. If oil were to be a resource from the north, by now there could have been nothing like Nigeria. Take away oil money from northerners and the groundnut pyramids would return back. They know it, its just that we are allowing our greed to direct our thoughts. The best thing that will ever happen to Nigeria is to practise true federalism. Let every state control their resources and lets see if we would not do better than we are presently.

Moreover, why has any southerner not thought of citing another military university down south? Because one is in the north already. Inshort, no need to wake up sleeping dogs. This country na our own, if we no fit dey here repair am, we go dey here destroy am together, as for me i no go leave dis country go any gaddenm place.
Thank you................

Good & true talk.
65  Forum / Politics / Re: Who caused the Niger-Delta crisis ? on: 19-08-2009 07:22 PM
Do we REALLY NEED a Petroleum University in Kaduna at this time? Sometimes, I think, Yar'Adua and his boys just dont want peace in this Country. There is no Federal Institution of Higher Learning in Bayelsa State and no Federal University in Delta State and they 're talking about a Federal University of petroleun in Kaduna State that does not have a drop of Oil? I think this President is sick in the head.
66  Forum / Politics / Re: who was the worst president of Nigeria. on: 19-08-2009 07:16 PM
Yar'Adua is by far the worst. So, change ur topic to "Who IS the..."
67  Forum / Politics / Re: Is yar'adua sincerely commited to solving the Niger/delta crisis? on: 10-08-2009 09:44 PM
The so called amnesty to the so called militants in the Niger delta is only a temporary cosmetic solutions (if I can call it that) that will not bring about any qualitative cum quantitative improvement in the standard of living of the people of the delta. I am not totally against it given that it will bring about a remote semblence of ceasation of hostilities. However, as long as the fundamental questions that gave rise to the crisis of instability (that they call militancy) is not addressed, there wont be any headway in this issue.
68  Forum / Politics / Re: Who caused the Niger-Delta crisis ? on: 10-08-2009 09:25 PM
Make no mistake, the Proclamation made by President of the FR of Nigeria looks similar to a broadcast by coupist taking over government illegally, that is actually not the issue. The issue is that the proclamation is seen as a means to peace in the Niger Delta... this view is equally shared by some militants as they also have made public there interest to partake in the process. However the cause of militancy and other forms of protest in the region remains neglected. We are in a dilemma... the crisis of development in the Niger Delta has kicked of several other crises viz environmental crisis, value crisis, educational crisis etc. Will amnesty return the Niger Delta to its self sustaining nature

 The so called amnesty to the so called militants in the Niger delta is only a temporary cosmetic solutions (if I can call it that) that will not bring about any qualitative cum quantitative improvement in the standard of living of the people of the delta. I am not totally against it given that it will bring about a remote semblence of ceasation of hostilities. However, as long as the fundamental questions that gave rise to the crisis of instability (that they call militancy) is not addressed, there wont be any headway in this issue.     

69  Forum / Politics / Re: Can the north survive without the Niger-Delta oil? on: 10-08-2009 09:17 PM
Quote from: bertona12 on 22-07-2009 08:13 PM
we should not decieve ourselves-Since the discovery of oil,groundnut,cocoa and others are not heard of again.Every tom, and harry focuses his attention on the oil.How I wish the country will be divided into its former three part so that everybody will mind his business

True talk.
70  Forum / Politics / Re: Can the north survive without the Niger-Delta oil? on: 25-04-2009 08:21 PM
Let me state from the outset that I am aware that at the end of this piece, some will want to preach to me about a New Nigeria and the need to jettison Ethnicity. This piece/ comments are aimed at illuminating this historical contradictions in the prevailing thought on Oil Politics in this Forum.

Once again, as always, I will not fail to point out the truth. Viz: Oil is not the cause of our problems. The Problem is lack of conscientious leadership. This has given room to ETHNIC BASED POLITICAL DOMINATION. It was ethnic based political domination that led to the HYPER-CENTRALIZATION OF POWER in this country. It was same that led to the needless 30 months  Civil War & the creation of nonviable states It was same that created primitive accumulation in our body polity. I guess it's time I addressed this issue once and for all.

This was what went down. Before Independence and the few years following it, Agricultural products found mainly in the homelands of the major Ethnic groups where the mainstay of the Nigerian Political economy. The structure of Government was DELIBERATELY DESIGNED then to reflect the resource location. Thus, the Hausa/Fulani controlled the Northern Region that produced Tin, Groundnut & hide & skin. The Yorubas controlled the Cocoa producing Western Region. While the Igbos on their part controlled the Palm Products producing Eastern Region. Funny enough, their was no SOUTHERN REGION, even though the smallest child with any knowledge of compass knew that it has North, East, South & West. As always, Nigeria's was DIFFERENT. Now, because the resources were securely in the hands of the 3 Major Ethnic Groups, the Nigerian central Elite, which was and still is a conglomerate of the elites of the ethnic groups ion the country, but Controlled and dominated by those from the Big 3 (B3), due to their population, allowed the practice of a GOOD FEDERAL SYSTEM. Under that system(1946-1966) there was regional autonomy. Each region ran it's business with relative autarky from the Central Government. Each of the regions had control of their resources and destiny. They reaped the benefits of their resources and pay an agreed Percentage  to the Federal Government as tax. That was how, they had money to do what they want to do. The Western Region scored high on Education (Free Education and the establishment of The University of Ibadan), built the tallest building in Africa then, the Cocoa house in Ibadan, established the first TV station in Africa, etc. The Western Region was richest then.
The Northern and Eastern Regions were not left behind. They too used their moneys they way they deemed fit. ABU Zaria & UNN, Nsuka were established in the North & East respectively. among other things.

It should be noted that at this period, Revenue Allocation in this country was based on the Derivation Formula. All the Revenue Allocation Commissions before Independence, from Hick-Phillipson (1951) to Raisman Commission (1958) put Derivation at nothing less than 50%. However, all this changed when a new resource with high money spinning potentials-OIL- was discovered in Oloibiri in the non-Ibo section of Eastern Nigeria. The Raisman Report did not hide this. The report stated the revenue that will accrue to the Eastern Region in the future "was too sizable to ignore".( Raisma Report, 1958, p.24.) So with this in mind, the elites on the major ethnic groups, seeing that their homelands do not produce any drop of Oil at the time, used their access to state power to reduce the Derivation component of the Revenue Allocation system, that creates Fiscal Autonomy and True Federalism in the Pre-independence era. However, because Oil was still not a major contributor to the nations wealth, Sections 134 and 140 subsection 1 of the 1960 & 1963 Constitutions respectively stated that:"...there shall be paid by the Federation to each Region(now State) a sum equal to 50 Percent...the proceeds of any royalty received by the Federation in respect of any mineral extracted from that region, and any mining rents derived by the Federation during that year from that region"

Even when the Military took office in 1966, Gowon did not reduce Derivation until 1970. And he only reduced it from 50% to 45%. One is forced to ask why Gowon a Military man left it in tact. This writer is inclined to proffer two hypotheses. 1. It was because Gowon is from Jos and has witnessed the horrors of Tin mining and the fate of the occupants of the area after their resource dries up. & 2. He did it to compensate the Oil Producing states & their People for their loyalty and support during the civil war. He did not touch it even when Oil became the major Foreign Exchange Earner in 1973, due to the Israeli/ Arab war of that year. Oil started contributing 93% of all export earnings from that year.
However, everything changed when the Ethnic Elites thought that Gowon is not doing what they sent him to do. They sent Murtala/Obasanjo to take over from Gowon in 1975. And one of the first actions of that Government was to reduce Derivation to 20% from Gowon's 45%. They also created 7 new unproductive states to share OIL MONEY. During this period, Population, Equality of States and Land mass took over from derivation as the major components of  Revenue Allocation in the Country. The prominence given to these 3 components revealed the true intent of the new Government and their policies. By Equality of States, it means that it does not matter whether you contribute ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to the Federation's Account, as long as you are a State, you will share from the 30% of all Revenues of the country.Thus, since the Yorubas & Hausa/Fulanis had far more states than others, they get more based on this. The Ibos were relegated to the background and punished after the war. So they had few states.
The same calculations go for Population and Land mass. Since 40% and 10%  of all revenue is shared based on Population and lands Mass respectively,(and with all the fraudulent censors figures) you guess is as good as mine who benefits from this absurd formula.If you dont get it, ask yourself this simple question. Viz: Who has the Highest Population & Land Mass in Nigeria? & who has been ruling for most of our 49 years history? That, I am sure will help solve the maths.

As if this was not bad enough, the so called Democratic Government of Shagari reduced Derivation from 20% to 2% in 1982. Yes! 2%! Buhari/ Idiagbon further slashed it to 1.5% in 1984. One thing to note here is that, anytime Derivation is reduced, the other 3 are increased.

All of the foregoing reductions and increases are aimed at benefiting a section of the country. Whether you all accepts it or not, you know it in your hearts that I am right.

Oil is not the problem. It is the management of the oil resources by the elite of the country, headed by the elites of the B3 that has led us into the woods. If you keep saying Oil is the problem and still refuse to give the Niger Delta People THEIR PROBLEM Oil, then U are an hypocrite. If Oil is a Curse as many people, especially Northerners claim, then, let the Niger Delta people control their curse. Why arrogate a curse to yourself?

In conclusion, Oil is not the bane of the Nigerian political economy. Oil is rather a blessing. However, we have misused our blessing. We have invested the proceeds in Corruption and darkness. We have invested it in Pink elephant projects. It wasn't Oil that told farmers in other regions of the country to leave their farms? It ain't oil that told them to sit back and wait for Federal Government hand outs every month. All regions of this country have Resources. But Ethnic based political domination and wickedness have blinded many to look within themselves for solutions. They all depend on oil money. That is why we have a monocultural economy today. Besides oil and gas, Nigeria has at least 34 other untapped minerals. We is nobody talking about all of these? It is pure wickedness. Everybody wants to suck the Oil wells in the Niger Delta until they are DRY, then leave the people with nothing. The People are not stupid enough to think that oil will flow forever. They have seen how dry the First Oil well in Oloibiri Bayelsa State is. They have no illusions. They want to enjoy the benefits of their resources. That is why we have militancy there.
OIL IS NOT A CURSE.

For more, see my Blogs on this via the links bellow:

http://www.naijapals.com/?L=blogs.blog&article=4083
71  Forum / Politics / Re: WHICH IS BETTER FOR NIGERIA, AGRICULTURE OR OIL? on: 25-04-2009 08:20 PM
Let me state from the outset that I am aware that at the end of this piece, some will want to preach to me about a New Nigeria and the need to jettison Ethnicity. This piece/ comments are aimed at illuminating this historical contradictions in the prevailing thought on Oil Politics in this Forum.

Once again, as always, I will not fail to point out the truth. Viz: Oil is not the cause of our problems. The Problem is lack of conscientious leadership. This has given room to ETHNIC BASED POLITICAL DOMINATION. It was ethnic based political domination that led to the HYPER-CENTRALIZATION OF POWER in this country. It was same that led to the needless 30 months  Civil War & the creation of nonviable states It was same that created primitive accumulation in our body polity. I guess it's time I addressed this issue once and for all.

This was what went down. Before Independence and the few years following it, Agricultural products found mainly in the homelands of the major Ethnic groups where the mainstay of the Nigerian Political economy. The structure of Government was DELIBERATELY DESIGNED then to reflect the resource location. Thus, the Hausa/Fulani controlled the Northern Region that produced Tin, Groundnut & hide & skin. The Yorubas controlled the Cocoa producing Western Region. While the Igbos on their part controlled the Palm Products producing Eastern Region. Funny enough, their was no SOUTHERN REGION, even though the smallest child with any knowledge of compass knew that it has North, East, South & West. As always, Nigeria's was DIFFERENT. Now, because the resources were securely in the hands of the 3 Major Ethnic Groups, the Nigerian central Elite, which was and still is a conglomerate of the elites of the ethnic groups ion the country, but Controlled and dominated by those from the Big 3 (B3), due to their population, allowed the practice of a GOOD FEDERAL SYSTEM. Under that system(1946-1966) there was regional autonomy. Each region ran it's business with relative autarky from the Central Government. Each of the regions had control of their resources and destiny. They reaped the benefits of their resources and pay an agreed Percentage  to the Federal Government as tax. That was how, they had money to do what they want to do. The Western Region scored high on Education (Free Education and the establishment of The University of Ibadan), built the tallest building in Africa then, the Cocoa house in Ibadan, established the first TV station in Africa, etc. The Western Region was richest then.
The Northern and Eastern Regions were not left behind. They too used their moneys they way they deemed fit. ABU Zaria & UNN, Nsuka were established in the North & East respectively. among other things.

It should be noted that at this period, Revenue Allocation in this country was based on the Derivation Formula. All the Revenue Allocation Commissions before Independence, from Hick-Phillipson (1951) to Raisman Commission (1958) put Derivation at nothing less than 50%. However, all this changed when a new resource with high money spinning potentials-OIL- was discovered in Oloibiri in the non-Ibo section of Eastern Nigeria. The Raisman Report did not hide this. The report stated the revenue that will accrue to the Eastern Region in the future "was too sizable to ignore".( Raisma Report, 1958, p.24.) So with this in mind, the elites on the major ethnic groups, seeing that their homelands do not produce any drop of Oil at the time, used their access to state power to reduce the Derivation component of the Revenue Allocation system, that creates Fiscal Autonomy and True Federalism in the Pre-independence era. However, because Oil was still not a major contributor to the nations wealth, Sections 134 and 140 subsection 1 of the 1960 & 1963 Constitutions respectively stated that:"...there shall be paid by the Federation to each Region(now State) a sum equal to 50 Percent...the proceeds of any royalty received by the Federation in respect of any mineral extracted from that region, and any mining rents derived by the Federation during that year from that region"

Even when the Military took office in 1966, Gowon did not reduce Derivation until 1970. And he only reduced it from 50% to 45%. One is forced to ask why Gowon a Military man left it in tact. This writer is inclined to proffer two hypotheses. 1. It was because Gowon is from Jos and has witnessed the horrors of Tin mining and the fate of the occupants of the area after their resource dries up. & 2. He did it to compensate the Oil Producing states & their People for their loyalty and support during the civil war. He did not touch it even when Oil became the major Foreign Exchange Earner in 1973, due to the Israeli/ Arab war of that year. Oil started contributing 93% of all export earnings from that year.
However, everything changed when the Ethnic Elites thought that Gowon is not doing what they sent him to do. They sent Murtala/Obasanjo to take over from Gowon in 1975. And one of the first actions of that Government was to reduce Derivation to 20% from Gowon's 45%. They also created 7 new unproductive states to share OIL MONEY. During this period, Population, Equality of States and Land mass took over from derivation as the major components of  Revenue Allocation in the Country. The prominence given to these 3 components revealed the true intent of the new Government and their policies. By Equality of States, it means that it does not matter whether you contribute ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to the Federation's Account, as long as you are a State, you will share from the 30% of all Revenues of the country.Thus, since the Yorubas & Hausa/Fulanis had far more states than others, they get more based on this. The Ibos were relegated to the background and punished after the war. So they had few states.
The same calculations go for Population and Land mass. Since 40% and 10%  of all revenue is shared based on Population and lands Mass respectively,(and with all the fraudulent censors figures) you guess is as good as mine who benefits from this absurd formula.If you dont get it, ask yourself this simple question. Viz: Who has the Highest Population & Land Mass in Nigeria? & who has been ruling for most of our 49 years history? That, I am sure will help solve the maths.

As if this was not bad enough, the so called Democratic Government of Shagari reduced Derivation from 20% to 2% in 1982. Yes! 2%! Buhari/ Idiagbon further slashed it to 1.5% in 1984. One thing to note here is that, anytime Derivation is reduced, the other 3 are increased.

All of the foregoing reductions and increases are aimed at benefiting a section of the country. Whether you all accepts it or not, you know it in your hearts that I am right.

Oil is not the problem. It is the management of the oil resources by the elite of the country, headed by the elites of the B3 that has led us into the woods. If you keep saying Oil is the problem and still refuse to give the Niger Delta People THEIR PROBLEM Oil, then U are an hypocrite. If Oil is a Curse as many people, especially Northerners claim, then, let the Niger Delta people control their curse. Why arrogate a curse to yourself?

In conclusion, Oil is not the bane of the Nigerian political economy. Oil is rather a blessing. However, we have misused our blessing. We have invested the proceeds in Corruption and darkness. We have invested it in Pink elephant projects. It wasn't Oil that told farmers in other regions of the country to leave their farms? It ain't oil that told them to sit back and wait for Federal Government hand outs every month. All regions of this country have Resources. But Ethnic based political domination and wickedness have blinded many to look within themselves for solutions. They all depend on oil money. That is why we have a monocultural economy today. Besides oil and gas, Nigeria has at least 34 other untapped minerals. We is nobody talking about all of these? It is pure wickedness. Everybody wants to suck the Oil wells in the Niger Delta until they are DRY, then leave the people with nothing. The People are not stupid enough to think that oil will flow forever. They have seen how dry the First Oil well in Oloibiri Bayelsa State is. They have no illusions. They want to enjoy the benefits of their resources. That is why we have militancy there.
OIL IS NOT A CURSE.

For more, see my Blogs on this via the links bellow:

http://www.naijapals.com/?L=blogs.blog&article=4083
72  Forum / Politics / Re: Nuclear weapons on: 23-04-2009 10:09 PM
Quote from: zarma on 19-04-2009 10:34 PM
Shocked Today we understand that having nuclear Technology is one of the factors that characterized a develop country. But the technology can serve for two purpose: 1) civilian purpose e.g in power plant for electricity generation and 2) millitary purpose e.g ballistis missiles.
We have seen the divesting effect of nuclear weapon in japan Hiroshima And Nagassaki during the second world war and USA being the experimenter and from all indication regretted the experiment.
"Remember does who kill by stabbing don't want a person to stand behind them with a knife fearing............."
So for that they may do anything to stop the proliferation being it for civilian or millitary purposes because many will hind under civilian purposes to later convert it to millitary.
(Read the Book the man who saw tomorrow or watch the video)

Thanks my brother. You made great points here. The whole fight against Nuclear proliferation is a product of FEAR. Fear of the unknown. There is no empirical or historical justification for it. Paradoxically, I think, Nuclear weapons make this world a safer place. I say this because it is a historical fact that the world has enjoyed longer period on relative peace under the Nuclear age than any other time in modern state system. Since 1945 when the Nuclear age began with the Hiroshima & Nagasaki attacks, there has never been any war between great or medium Powers. This is all because of Nuclear deterrence.  So if all the states that got it after 1945 have not used theirs, why do the US thinks new Nuclear states will use theirs against it?
73  Forum / Politics / Re: Can farida waziri fight curruption? on: 18-04-2009 11:49 PM
O! It's a shame that Farida Waziri & Mike Aoondoaka have succeeded in illing E.F.C.C. Let's see what comes out of the Halliburton scandal.
74  Forum / Politics / Re: What is wrong with Nigeria? on: 18-04-2009 11:33 PM
Quote from: mrmtolve on  3-04-2009 12:10 PM
imposing a western political/social structure on an african country has never and will never work for obvious reasons. nigeria, like other african countries needs to develop it's own structures and mechanism specific to its traditions, culture and people. only this can work

what you are saying sounds like 'slavery was worth it because we now have obama': no, it doesn't work like that. different societies need different things. colonisation was  not worth it in order to have a little bit of european-styled infrastructure, some french and english speaking cities and television in our homes.

after all, it took centuries for european countries to develop to the point that they are today. it's like putting an 18 year old's outfit on an 8 year old, guess what: it just won't fit

australia, like the US, is primarily formed of europeans who emigrated or were sent there (orphans, criminals e.t.c), but still europeans. it is  obvious that they would strive under a western colonisation system,they were part of it. they are almost like a 'new europe', if i may say so.

left to africans, african nations as they exist today would never exist. tribalisms and culture would not have permitted it. the lines were drawn  by westerners in europe, not by africans. it would have developed differently,how? well, we can not know,but limiting ourselves to believing that the only functional and right governmental system is the 'western - democracy' type suggested implies believing that all nations have the same culture and mentality,but that is clearly not the case.

all you have to do is flick through a european history book to identify all the milestones that were sysematically and gradually achieved in order to get to where they are today: women didn't vote, society was highly hierarchical and there was no such thing as human rights. all these came by as a result of the french revolution, the second world war and feminist groups lobbying.

having said all that, it is obvious that african nations must now work hard under the current framework in which they find themselves. work hard and fast if we want to have any hope of catching up and finding our place in this increasing fast developing world. but we must keep in mind our issues, our uniqueness and peculiar characteristics and work around these. it's time to take control and responsiblity.

starting to holding our politicians accountable could be a good starting point...

I concur to a large extent.
75  Forum / Politics / Re: Can the north survive without the Niger-Delta oil? on: 18-04-2009 11:27 PM
Quote from: kunzles on 10-02-2009 07:22 PM
Quote from: dadiyata on  7-01-2009 06:11 PM
Hi guyz,
the north can definitely survive without the much pampered oil revenue. Let me take you back a little to the colonial time before the oil exploration, the administrative governance of the entire country was financed with revenue accrued from Tin, Grondnut, Cotton etc. why will someone think that without the oil money the north can never see light of the day?
its so painful that ruling class of the south have brainwashed thier people with the belief tha all thier misfortunes is caused by the north. my brothers you better shine your eyes! you have been fooled for a longtime without you realizing. cheers to all

son, do you know what u are talking about? its apparent you don't......ask around for the dynamism o tha world economy today and tell me tha relevance of the of yesteryear's management of Nigerian economy to Nigerian economy of today....if you don't k know better ask around and if you are honest to yourself u will know the part of Nigeria that is brainwatched to do everything their "elite" leaders say.....north can survive i agree but no bullshitting...we all know whats going on

Not bad. objective.
76  Forum / Politics / Re: Zimbabwe and the inertia of African leaders on: 18-04-2009 11:21 PM
Quote from: lonelyzeal on 13-02-2009 12:14 AM
Well Tvshngirai  has being sworn in as Prime Minister recently.Let's just hope that blood and Power thirty Mugabe will allow peace to reign there.If you ask me,Zimbabwe will not know peace & development until Mugabe & his band of thieves are dead & eaten by vultures.
He was only sworn in to be killed. They have succeeded in killing his wife. Countries like this make Africa stink. To think that the A.U is folding its hand and doing nothing is just too appalling.
77  Forum / Politics / Re: Constitutional review: What does it portent for our collective future? on: 18-04-2009 11:18 PM
With what Yar'Adua and Aondooka had  done to the Muhammed Uwais led Committee on Electoral Reforms Report, all in the name of White paper, I dont see any good coming out of the so called Constitutional Review. Who are those to Review or amen it? Is it the Bankoles of this world? A Speaker that was quoted as saying that his party will deploy the Military to Ekiti re-run gubernatorial Election cannot be trusted to provide us with a democratic Constitution. Already, Mark is a retired General in the Army. So, I wont even talk about him. Let's see what's next.
78  Forum / Politics / Re: Nuclear weapons on: 18-04-2009 11:12 PM
The recent launching of a Satellite by North Korea and the position of the West, which fears that it was actually a covet Missile test shows that Nuclear proliferation is still at the heart of International Relations. Interestingly, Obama and medvedev has agreed in PRINCIPLE to reduce the Nuclear stockpile of the USA and Russia respectively. let's keep our legs cross, get popcorns and sit back and watch our the drama goes. The theater of international politics is always interesting to those who love suspense & intrigues.   
79  Forum / Politics / Re: Hunger and anger : an emerging global crisis on: 18-04-2009 11:05 PM
Methinks the current global Financial crisis and the sharp and steady fall in the price of Oil is a blessing in disguise to this country. The only problem is, our blind rulers will not see that this is the time to pay more attention to AGRICULTURE & FOOD SECURITY. This is our opportunity to diversify our economy by looking at other sectors. & as far as I am concern, large scale mechanize farming like that stupid, old foolish thief called Obasanjo is running in Otta is what we need now. Any country that wants to be a power in the international system must secure an appreciable degree of internal FOOD PRODUCTION. And this is where Agriculture comes in.
80  Forum / Politics / Re: Who caused the Niger-Delta crisi on: 18-04-2009 10:58 PM
Quote from: Sage on 18-01-2009 10:45 AM
Okay Okay Okay People....
My thing is... How do we solve the crisis?
we should rather focus on rectifying the problem
instead of only analysing it.
People wht can be done?

In order to rectify things, you have to know where they went wrong. You cannot solve a problem you dont know. And in order to know and understand the problem, you have to identify the principal characters. That is the essence of this topic.
Pages:
1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 ... 20