Nuclear weapons (Page 2)

Date: 06-09-2008 12:10 am (15 years ago) | Author: FORTUNE A
1 [2] 3 4
- Helga at 5-10-2008 01:33 PM (15 years ago)
(f)
America made so many enemies thats why they need to have the best weapons as they are very frightened indeed.
Look back in history and see what a mess they left after every war in the world. Vietnam, Korea and now Iraq as they have never finished anything proper. They have a big mouth and let other people clean up there mess they made in the world. Even now children lose there limbs in Vietnam on land mines what the Americans planted.
How come the world is trying to ban landmines lots of nations did sign this agreement except The USA? How come America is exempt of being able to prosecute there war criminals? Are they better then the rest of the world? Dont think so.
 
The Bush family has the biggest investment in weapons of mass destruction so why should they want to give this up?
 
On Obama. Black people have to believe first themselves that a black man can win.
To me it doesnt matter what race he/she will be.
 
Posted: at 5-10-2008 01:33 PM (15 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- zie85er at 9-10-2008 12:25 AM (15 years ago)
(m)
@ helga... its not just this landmines agreemnt dat they r not part of, there r a lot of other agreements dat they r exempt...and i dont know why

Posted: at 9-10-2008 12:25 AM (15 years ago) | Hero
Reply
- Helga at 11-10-2008 08:45 AM (15 years ago)
(f)
I tell you why.

Because the USA is very destructive in lots of things.
And they think they are above the law they think whatever they do is justified but is it?
They put sanctions and rules on every country except themselves. So they can keep doing what they do.
Posted: at 11-10-2008 08:45 AM (15 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- Godsson at 11-10-2008 10:12 PM (15 years ago)
(m)
The main reason why I want most regional powers(excluding Iran)to ve Nukes is Deterrent.So Big powers wont bully them at whim.
Posted: at 11-10-2008 10:12 PM (15 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- blackberryPearl at 12-10-2008 12:42 AM (15 years ago)
(f)
they do things to their benefit
Posted: at 12-10-2008 12:42 AM (15 years ago) | Hero
Reply
- Godsson at 12-10-2008 11:14 PM (15 years ago)
(m)
Just as they do things that they think favors them,while in reality those things dont,other states are doing same.Now imagine North Korea.The world,led by the US have being negotiating with North Korea for a long time now to discontinue their Nuclear program.They now succeeded.NK destroyed her major plant for all to see.now instead of the Bush presidency to keep their side of the bargain,the ARROGANT government refused to remove North Korea's name from that stupid List of "rouge states".Now that NK is back with their program,I just saw today that the State Department is about working with Congress to remove them.TOO LATE TO APOLOGIZE!Nice Timberland & OneNation Song.
The ARROGANCE of the US would be it's undoing.Do you Know that Nelson Mandela was in the US List of Terrorist up until this his 90th birthday?
GOD BLESS AMERICA.let them continue having bubble heads like G.W.Bush as presidents.Nobody will tell them what will happen to them in the next 4 to 8 years.
Posted: at 12-10-2008 11:14 PM (15 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- blackberryPearl at 12-10-2008 11:15 PM (15 years ago)
(f)
lets hope obama will happen
Posted: at 12-10-2008 11:15 PM (15 years ago) | Hero
Reply
- Godsson at 12-10-2008 11:31 PM (15 years ago)
(m)
Obama Presidency might not be less ARROGANT.After all,he's against NAFTA and other agreements that he perceives to be against US Core interest.
Posted: at 12-10-2008 11:31 PM (15 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- blackberryPearl at 12-10-2008 11:32 PM (15 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: Godsson on 12-10-2008 11:31 PM
Obama Presidency might not be less ARROGANT.After all,he's against NAFTA and other agreements that he perceives to be against US Core interest.
i checked the stuff today, he went down by a percent and mc cain 2 %
Posted: at 12-10-2008 11:32 PM (15 years ago) | Hero
Reply
- Godsson at 12-10-2008 11:33 PM (15 years ago)
(m)
Did Mc Cain Gain?
Posted: at 12-10-2008 11:33 PM (15 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- blackberryPearl at 13-10-2008 12:18 AM (15 years ago)
(f)
yeah
Posted: at 13-10-2008 12:18 AM (15 years ago) | Hero
Reply
- khadijah at 13-10-2008 02:43 AM (15 years ago)
(f)
and the most annoyin is their CIA pullin all sort of stunts...i once heard someone say they are responsible for many political deaths,home and abroad..e.gabacha,abiola..(u didnt hear it from me ooo)
Posted: at 13-10-2008 02:43 AM (15 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- blackberryPearl at 13-10-2008 03:52 AM (15 years ago)
(f)
the one that pissed me off the most was when the CIA tied Niger Republic to Iraq. it was all false
Posted: at 13-10-2008 03:52 AM (15 years ago) | Hero
Reply
- Helga at 13-10-2008 09:35 AM (15 years ago)
(f)
Godsson you forget one thing but you know this very well.
Although Obama sounds very good and i said this before hes a very good speaker, he is only ONE man in a big party.
I read every time look what this man is going to do for the blacks. But is he? He might have good intentions but the others may not.
Time will tell.

See all this nuclear free area's in the middle east is only designed to protect Israel who has nuclear weapons so they stay masters there.
Posted: at 13-10-2008 09:35 AM (15 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- Godsson at 13-10-2008 10:13 PM (15 years ago)
(m)
HELGA
You are right.I've said it elsewhere that Obama is just one man,& a relative newcomer in the US internal power structure.Besides,the Congress still has overwhelming powers in domestic policies & the ratification of International Treaties.Thus,his hands may be tied.The Congress & other institutions in the US ve a way of frustrating Presidents.

Also,good intentions dont always win.Good intentions ve to be backed by capability.However,as U've rightly said,"time will tell"

You are also right about Israel & the Middle East.However,I'll ve to reiterate my stance against Iran's acquisition of Nukes.You cannot trust a state that is built on religious fundamentalism,extremism & traditionalism to handle such with the requisite rationality.
Posted: at 13-10-2008 10:13 PM (15 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- Helga at 14-10-2008 11:04 AM (15 years ago)
(f)
Yes i agree with you on that one. Very scary indeed.
Posted: at 14-10-2008 11:04 AM (15 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- Godsson at 17-10-2008 10:53 PM (15 years ago)
(m)
Nigeria is another country that does not need Nuclear Weapons.If we could not manage conventional bombs & allowed them to blow at Ikeja,I doubt how we can handle such delicate stuff.besides,some greedy men(who only think about their pockets) would sell a part to terrorist.The Nigeria of TODAY must not even think of it.
Posted: at 17-10-2008 10:53 PM (15 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- zie85er at 18-10-2008 12:02 AM (15 years ago)
(m)
Quote from: Godsson on 17-10-2008 10:53 PM
Nigeria is another country that does not need Nuclear Weapons.If we could not manage conventional bombs & allowed them to blow at Ikeja,I doubt how we can handle such delicate stuff.besides,some greedy men(who only think about their pockets) would sell a part to terrorist.The Nigeria of TODAY must not even think of it.
hey!!!
nigerians r bad...but not dat bad

Posted: at 18-10-2008 12:02 AM (15 years ago) | Hero
Reply
- Godsson at 18-10-2008 12:09 AM (15 years ago)
(m)
Nigerians are worst than that.What is the difference between selling fake drugs & Bombs?the are all weapons of mass destruction.We must not be allowed to imagine having any serious WMD.lol.
Posted: at 18-10-2008 12:09 AM (15 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- khadijah at 18-10-2008 04:08 AM (15 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: Godsson on 18-10-2008 12:09 AM
Nigerians are worst than that.What is the difference between selling fake drugs & Bombs?the are all weapons of mass destruction.We must not be allowed to imagine having any serious WMD.lol.
lol...well i think we dont need it but not the same reasons..i'm just wondering what we need it for..which war we wan fight...who wan beef naija?its just a waste of money and time for us..the jazz we get sef don pass all these bombs....
Posted: at 18-10-2008 04:08 AM (15 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
1 [2] 3 4