the man himself will regret getting married to a second wife cos the hahala will be too much on him Yap
Live and let live! Posted: at 9-11-2010 01:19 PM (13 years ago) | Hero | |
Reply |
one man one woman nothing more
ONE WOMAN AND UNCOUNTABLE CONCUBINES CANNOT AND WILL NOT BE MORALLY PREFERRED OVER A FAITHFULNESS TO TWO OR THREE WIVES It seems u are planning to take a 2nd wife........becos I know u have one already.......be careful..... Hmmmmmmmmmmmmm!
Live and let live! Posted: at 9-11-2010 01:21 PM (13 years ago) | Hero | |
Reply |
omorewa at 9-11-2010 01:23 PM (13 years ago) (f) so why did our fore fathers marry many wives then?
don't over step your boundaries.. thank you! Posted: at 9-11-2010 01:23 PM (13 years ago) | Gistmaniac | |
Reply |
omorewa at 9-11-2010 01:25 PM (13 years ago) (f) IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO YOU BUT NOT TO SOME THAT ARE READY TO BECOME EVEN THE 10th. IN TERMS OF SHARING SOME STILL BELIEVE THAT THE AXIOM"THERE IS LOVE IN SHARING"SHOULD BE MORE INCLUSIVE. DON'T FORGET THAT 300 WIVES AND 700 CONCUBINES SHARED KING SOLOMON WITHOUT COMPLAIN
I see that u are approving such a practice, but tell me something, what about the vice versa? What if it would be allowed for a woman to have how many husbands she wants, could you live being the 2nd or the 3rd husband?
don't over step your boundaries.. thank you! Posted: at 9-11-2010 01:25 PM (13 years ago) | Gistmaniac | |
Reply |
so why did our fore fathers marry many wives then?
I really abstain myself very bad from answering this question! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Live and let live! Posted: at 9-11-2010 01:25 PM (13 years ago) | Hero | |
Reply |
bhl72 at 9-11-2010 01:33 PM (13 years ago) (m) in the days when women were baby making factories and helped out with farm work and never had the kind of contemporary interface and affiliation with their husbands as is being felt now and enjoyed, it would have been overlooked. Presently, the roles of the women as wives have been enhanced by the robust information available and the rapid, avid 'technological emotional advancement' supported by the perceived notion of her usefulness as a partner, friend, confidant, etc. Women are no longer pieces of property bought (by bride price) and owned as such... they are the most valuable companion, a resource of inestimable value, when they are in the right quantity and quality, and in the hands of a master artisan... that knows her value... I say, 'NO!' to more than one wifey, there can be no relationship when it is more than one... it is crowding, a confusing audience of sorts... Posted: at 9-11-2010 01:33 PM (13 years ago) | Gistmaniac | |
Reply |
bhl72 at 9-11-2010 01:34 PM (13 years ago) (m) IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO YOU BUT NOT TO SOME THAT ARE READY TO BECOME EVEN THE 10th. IN TERMS OF SHARING SOME STILL BELIEVE THAT THE AXIOM"THERE IS LOVE IN SHARING"SHOULD BE MORE INCLUSIVE. DON'T FORGET THAT 300 WIVES AND 700 CONCUBINES SHARED KING SOLOMON WITHOUT COMPLAIN
I see that u are approving such a practice, but tell me something, what about the vice versa? What if it would be allowed for a woman to have how many husbands she wants, could you live being the 2nd or the 3rd husband? Tufia kwa! Aru!! Posted: at 9-11-2010 01:34 PM (13 years ago) | Gistmaniac | |
Reply |
in the days when women were baby making factories and helped out with farm work and never had the kind of contemporary interface and affiliation with their husbands as is being felt now and enjoyed, it would have been overlooked.
Presently, the roles of the women as wives have been enhanced by the robust information available and the rapid, avid 'technological emotional advancement' supported by the perceived notion of her usefulness as a partner, friend, confidant, etc.
Women are no longer pieces of property bought (by bride price) and owned as such... they are the most valuable companion, a resource of inestimable value, when they are in the right quantity and quality, and in the hands of a master artisan... that knows her value...
I say, 'NO!' to more than one wifey, there can be no relationship when it is more than one... it is crowding, a confusing audience of sorts...
Live and let live! Posted: at 9-11-2010 01:35 PM (13 years ago) | Hero | |
Reply |
do4sure at 9-11-2010 01:36 PM (13 years ago) (m) IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO YOU BUT NOT TO SOME THAT ARE READY TO BECOME EVEN THE 10th. IN TERMS OF SHARING SOME STILL BELIEVE THAT THE AXIOM"THERE IS LOVE IN SHARING"SHOULD BE MORE INCLUSIVE. DON'T FORGET THAT 300 WIVES AND 700 CONCUBINES SHARED KING SOLOMON WITHOUT COMPLAIN
I see that u are approving such a practice, but tell me something, what about the vice versa? What if it would be allowed for a woman to have how many husbands she wants, could you live being the 2nd or the 3rd husband? IF IAM COMFORTABLE WITH THAT ARRANGEMENT I WILL RETAIN THE RELATIONSHIP BUT IF I AM NOT IT IS NEITHER BIDDING ON ALL MEN NOR RENDERED SUCH ARRANGEMENT IMPOSSIBLE. Posted: at 9-11-2010 01:36 PM (13 years ago) | Gistmaniac | |
Reply |
sophiebaby at 9-11-2010 01:36 PM (13 years ago) (f) one man to one woman. i get english bible BUT, DONT MEN/WOMEN RE-MARRY? WHATS THE DIFF?
Life is 2short to wake up in the morning with regrets. LOVE KEEPS NO RECORD OF WRONGS*SOPHIEBABY* :* Posted: at 9-11-2010 01:36 PM (13 years ago) | Addicted Hero | |
Reply |
IT MAY BE IMPOSSIBLE TO YOU BUT NOT TO SOME THAT ARE READY TO BECOME EVEN THE 10th. IN TERMS OF SHARING SOME STILL BELIEVE THAT THE AXIOM"THERE IS LOVE IN SHARING"SHOULD BE MORE INCLUSIVE. DON'T FORGET THAT 300 WIVES AND 700 CONCUBINES SHARED KING SOLOMON WITHOUT COMPLAIN
I see that u are approving such a practice, but tell me something, what about the vice versa? What if it would be allowed for a woman to have how many husbands she wants, could you live being the 2nd or the 3rd husband? IF IAM COMFORTABLE WITH THAT ARRANGEMENT I WILL RETAIN THE RELATIONSHIP BUT IF I AM NOT IT IS NEITHER BIDDING ON ALL MEN NOR RENDERED SUCH ARRANGEMENT IMPOSSIBLE. Are you telling me that you would take in consideration that kind of marriage? I don't believe u!
Live and let live! Posted: at 9-11-2010 01:39 PM (13 years ago) | Hero | |
Reply |
steph85 at 9-11-2010 01:39 PM (13 years ago) (f) Reading my bible which says 1 man 1 woman case closed Posted: at 9-11-2010 01:39 PM (13 years ago) | Upcoming | |
Reply |
so why did our fore fathers marry many wives then?
one thing is our four fathers then like having much children and then even if they marry more than a wife the wives live happily compare to now and i think they want to follow the footstep of Solomon but its nt right now they are the one advising their children against 2nd wife cos they know the consequences Posted: at 9-11-2010 01:42 PM (13 years ago) | Gistmaniac | |
Reply |
bitte at 9-11-2010 01:47 PM (13 years ago) (m) ok i see brb Posted: at 9-11-2010 01:47 PM (13 years ago) | Upcoming | |
Reply |
justceetah at 9-11-2010 01:48 PM (13 years ago) (m) 4 me, nope but i can have mistresses
Friends determined by distance are no friends at all Posted: at 9-11-2010 01:48 PM (13 years ago) | Gistmaniac | |
Reply |
4 me, nope but i can have mistresses
I don't know which one is worse from those two!
Live and let live! Posted: at 9-11-2010 01:49 PM (13 years ago) | Hero | |
Reply |
omorewa at 9-11-2010 01:52 PM (13 years ago) (f) 4 me, nope but i can have mistresses
that bad when you know that your wife won't satisfy you why bother to marry her then??
don't over step your boundaries.. thank you! Posted: at 9-11-2010 01:52 PM (13 years ago) | Gistmaniac | |
Reply |
they both are the same even mistress is the worst Posted: at 9-11-2010 01:54 PM (13 years ago) | Gistmaniac | |
Reply |
justceetah at 9-11-2010 01:55 PM (13 years ago) (m) lol,but at least me & my mistress would knw marriage can't come in
Friends determined by distance are no friends at all Posted: at 9-11-2010 01:55 PM (13 years ago) | Gistmaniac | |
Reply |
they both are the same even mistress is the worst
Live and let live! Posted: at 9-11-2010 01:56 PM (13 years ago) | Hero | |
Reply |