clarajancita at 12-11-2014 10:15 AM (10 years ago)
(f)
A husband has told of his grief for his Jehovah’s Witness wife who reportedly died after refusing a blood transfusion. Adeline Keh, 40, suffered a fatal infection after giving birth by Caesarean section to her son at Homerton Hospital in east London, her distraught husband Kwaku said. She was transferred to the Papworth heart and lung hospital in Cambridge, where she is said to have refused a blood transfusion and died a month after the birth. Distraught: Kwaku Keh (left) has told of his grief for his wife Adeline (right). The new mother, a Jehovah’s Witness, reportedly died after refusing a blood transfusion when she developed an infection Homerton chiefs have launched an independent review of the tragic case, which was one of four new mothers’ deaths at the hospital in nine months. The inquest into Mrs Keh’s death found her decision to refuse blood ‘may have compromised the final medical intervention’, according to a report in the Evening Standard. It was also listed as a cause of death alongside acute respiratory distress syndrome, sepsis and an infection of the Caesarean wound. Mr Keh, a lawyer from Walthamstow, east London, told the Standard he was devastated that ‘we never got to come home as a family’. He added: ‘My wife and I were best friends… I was overjoyed and could not wait for them to come home. ‘Each time I went to pick her up [from the Homerton] I was told that she could not come home. Eventually my wife lost her fight and passed away.’ Jehovah’s Witnesses refuse to accept blood transfusions because they say blood represents life, and only God is the giver of life. That belief has led to scores of controversies, many of which have ended up before judges. Last year an Australian cancer patient who was just four months from turning 18 lost a court bid to refuse blood because he was still underage. And in March an English High Court judge gave permission for a baby heart disease sufferer to undergo blood transfusions despite the objections of his parents. A specialist told Mr Justice Keehan the cardiac patient, just a few weeks old, had no ‘long-term prospect of survival’ without the procedure. Yet the religious movement insists it is ‘totally unfounded’ to say many Witnesses, including children, die each year after refusing blood. A statement added: ‘Surgeons regularly perform such complex procedures as heart operations, orthopaedic surgery, and organ transplants without the use of blood transfusions. ‘Patients, including children, who do not receive transfusions usually fare as well as or better than those who do accept transfusions. ‘No one can say for certain that a patient will die because of refusing blood or will live because of accepting it.’ Mrs Keh’s case has prompted a review at Homerton Hospital because it was one of four deaths of new mothers in a nine-month period. ‘Mrs Keh’s was a very sad case and our thoughts are with her family,’ a spokesman told US ‘Each case was different and there were no obvious similarities, and each was reported to the Coroner’s office for review as is routine in these circumstances. ‘As well as being reviewed internally, two of the cases have also been the subject of review by the Care Quality Commission inspectors during their visit to the hospital earlier this year and nothing remiss was found. ‘We are now working with NHS England to seek a further independent review of the cases to see if any further lessons can be learnt. ‘Over 6,000 babies are now born at Homerton Hospital. We are seeing more high risk mothers due to a number of factors including: the increase in women having babies who have other clinical complications or conditions; and the fact that high risk women are referred to Homerton as it has a tertiary level neonatal intensive care unit. ‘The message to mothers is that we offer a top quality service with one of the biggest throughputs of mothers and babies in the capital.’
I am a metro reporter on Gistmania, I have been publishing news materials for over 5 years
Posted: at 12-11-2014 10:15 AM (10 years ago) | Hero
Wysetots at 12-11-2014 01:39 PM (10 years ago) (m)
So sad !!
Posted: at 12-11-2014 01:39 PM (10 years ago) | Hero
Writing is my passion and facts-proofing is my hobby, I have been writing at Gistmania for close to a decade now and It is one of the most exciting things I do. Outside writing, I love enjoying time with my loved ones - if you have any tip for me, please do get in touch
Posted: at 12-11-2014 02:04 PM (10 years ago) | Gistmaniac
for those who care abt God's say on matters read the following scriptures 1 gen 9:3 ,4 ; leveticus 17:10-14; ACTS 15:28,29. after reading make u coments not based on sentiments but on the unshakable word of God. also it should be known that there are better and safer alternatives to blood transfusion.
Posted: at 12-11-2014 08:35 PM (10 years ago) | Newbie
Chericoco at 12-11-2014 09:39 PM (10 years ago) (f)
No religion will make me die an untimely dead when i can make with the help of blood transfusion. Why s the husband crying. He followed his stupid religion.
Posted: at 12-11-2014 09:39 PM (10 years ago) | Gistmaniac
modarishu at 13-11-2014 04:48 AM (10 years ago) (f)
Jehova Witnesses are people whose minds have been trained and we adhere strictly to bible instuctions and principles and d bible in acts 15 vs 28 and 29 says we should abstain from blood,and whichever way u take blood into your system you are disobeying jehovas laws.so blood transfusion is agaisnt jehovas laws.one good thing is that jehovas laws for us are for our good and they are not burdensome the law on blood transfusion has existed even in the time of the israelites long before HIV and other related diseases .keeping Jehovas laws on blood keeps us clean even if we losse our life now we are sure of the life in paradise which is an everlasting life.
Posted: at 13-11-2014 04:48 AM (10 years ago) | Newbie