
It is going to be a tough time for public servants and politicians who loot money in Nigeria as the House of Representatives is set to amend the EFCC Act. The House of Representatives is pushing to have persons convicted of economic and financial crimes jailed for 20 years. This is part of the details of the new amendments to the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission Act, 2004 being reviewed by the House.
The lawmakers believe the Act which currently prescribes a penalty of “not less than two years” for economic and financial crimes is too lenient which is why many people are stealing public money.
The House is also considering to empower the EFCC to fight crime, insulate the anti-graft agency from interference by the Presidency and enhance its financial autonomy with the presentation of Four consolidated bills which gives the EFCC a degree of autonomy.
One of the bills, which was sponsored by a member from Cross River State, Mr. Bassey Ewa, proposes to raise the two-year term for economic and financial crimes offenders to 20 years. In the new bill, Section 18 of the Principal Act is amended to prescribe tougher punishments for economic and financial crimes.
The new subsection (C) reads:
The new proposal also states that plea bargaining or returning the full amount stolen does not exclude the convict from penalty. Subsection (d) adds,
Similarly, a company found guilty of economic or financial crimes, will be barred from doing business in Nigeria for 50 years. This is captured under subsection (e), which states that,
In a report by Punch, another key amendment seeks to remove the power of appointing the Chairman of the EFCC from the President and to be vested directly in the hands of Nigerians.
Under the extant provisions, the President appoints the chairman and forwards the name to the Senate for approval. But in the new amendment, members of the public, through a petition to the National Assembly, are empowered to make the appointments. For example, Section 3 of the Principal Act is amended to insert new subsections (4) and (5). The proposed subsection 4 reads:
“If upon investigation and found culpable, a simple majority vote of members of the National Assembly is required in considering the fate of the chairman or any of the affected member.”
Subsection (5) provides that the resolution, when passed, will be forwarded to the President, who shall within 30 days, either accept the resolution or reject it. The section empowers the National Assembly to override the President’s veto with a “two-thirds majority vote” of senators and members of the House of Representatives. To make the EFCC financially autonomous, the House proposes in Section 35 of the Act that the commission should retain “0.1 per cent” of recovered looted funds. It is also to retain “0.1 per cent” of its Internally-Generated Revenue. Another “0.1 per cent” of contracts awarded by the Federal Government is to the credited to the account of the commission.
The amendments were submitted by the Chairman of the House Committee on Financial Crimes, Mr. Kayode Oladele
Oladele’s bill,
Explaining why he sought harsher punishment for economic thieves, Ewa said:
“If your are 40 years old and you know that you will be 60 years by the time you are out of jail, you will have some fear in you and think about your children. “But to say two years is to encourage stealing the more because people say after all, it is only two years.”
Posted: at | |