The R. Kelly Verdict Is In

Date: 13-06-2008 10:01 pm (16 years ago) | Author: Ihuoma
- at 13-06-2008 10:01 PM (16 years ago)
(f)
R. Kelly acquitted
By Stacy St. Clair | Tribune reporter
2:12 PM CDT, June 13, 2008

A Cook County jury on Friday acquitted R&B superstar R. Kelly of child pornography charges, marking the end of a high-profile trial rich in courtroom drama and celebrity intrigue.

The 41-year-old singer, whose real name is Robert Kelly, long denied charges that he videotaped himself engaging in a variety of sex acts with his then-underage goddaughter. Authorities said the female in the video could have been as young as 13 at the time.

The jury of nine men and three women deliberated for 7 ½ hours before finding Kelly not guilty on all 14 counts.

The verdict ends a bizarre case that had languished for nearly six years. During almost four weeks of testimony, the jury heard about three-person segxwal encounters and watched a sex tape in which the male participant is seen urinating on a female.

Neither the alleged victim, now 23, nor her parents testified during the trial. All three denied her involvement in the tape to a grand jury in 2002.

Without their cooperation, the prosecution used other witnesses to describe the relationship Kelly shared with his goddaughter--an aspiring rapper who witnesses said became a member of his entourage while in junior high school. She often visited him at his downtown recording studio or watched him play basketball at a West Side gym, they testified.

Only one witness testified to having direct knowledge of an inappropriate relationship between Kelly and the alleged victim. Lisa Van Allen told the jury she engaged in a series of segxwal encounters with the singer and his goddaughter when the girl was a minor.

The defense tried to undermine Van Allen's testimony by accusing her of concocting the story to extort money from Kelly. Van Allen, who lives in Georgia, called prosecutors with information about the case shortly after her fiance was arrested on guns and weapons charges.

Kelly's attorneys contended the young woman in the tape is not the alleged victim but a prostitute. They called three family members of the alleged victim who testified that they saw no resemblance between their relative and the female in the video.

Kelly also did not testify. Without testimony from him or his alleged victim, the singer's attorneys built their case around a caterpillar-shape mole along his spine. They argued that the man in the recording has an unblemished back, meaning Kelly couldn't be the man in the video.

If you don't see the mole, the defense told the jury, then Kelly cannot be convicted.

Kelly's attorneys also suggested the 27-minute tape had been doctored, going so far as to say someone could have edited the singer's head onto another man's body. A prosecution expert testified such editing trickery would take 44 years and still would be obvious to viewers.

The drawn-out legal battle has not slowed Kelly's music career. He has released five albums and a greatest-hits collection since he was indicted in 2002. He also has completed several concert tours.

[email protected]


Posted: at 13-06-2008 10:01 PM (16 years ago) | Upcoming
- Dguy at 13-06-2008 11:02 PM (16 years ago)
(m)
Money talks

Posted: at 13-06-2008 11:02 PM (16 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- Vixenx at 14-06-2008 12:29 AM (16 years ago)
(f)
Dguy is right. ..I mean everyone saw the tape and its definitely him with that girl..he should've been locked up and keys thrown away.
Posted: at 14-06-2008 12:29 AM (16 years ago) | Addicted Hero
Reply
- Ihuoma at 14-06-2008 01:18 AM (16 years ago)
(f)
I am watching Nancy grace now and it was noted that the jury didnot have enough evidence to prove it was the girl in the video. The question was not if it was him but if it was her. They saw the tape only once and used still photos of the tape and tried to compare photos of the victim when she was younger to the still photos but they could not say (for sure) say if it was her. Keep in mind that the girl and her parents testified in 2002 that is not her. They also talked about a mole on R. Kelly's back that was not present on the man in the video (but they never looked at R. Kelly back's). I'm so upset. He avoided this for 6yrs and now he is out. They also made a point that the trial was held in Chicago where R.Kelly is from.

I saw parents out there cheering R.Kelly on like this was nothing serious. It's sad. I did not see the tape (don't want to) but I was so sure they had him.

Posted: at 14-06-2008 01:18 AM (16 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- Ihuoma at 14-06-2008 01:20 AM (16 years ago)
(f)
They said that the jury told them that they believe that it was R.kelly but they could not confirm if it was her. It was noted that she never appeared in court during the trail which the jury said it would have made a difference.

Posted: at 14-06-2008 01:20 AM (16 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- khadijah at 15-06-2008 12:57 PM (16 years ago)
(f)
not suprising.
Posted: at 15-06-2008 12:57 PM (16 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- Abby at 19-07-2008 03:11 AM (16 years ago)
(f)
theres no justice in this world... Imagine if that was me, i'd ve been in prison since 2002   Angry
Posted: at 19-07-2008 03:11 AM (16 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- myragonza at 25-07-2008 11:08 AM (16 years ago)
(f)
i actually saw that video.....but seriously.....doesn't look like him.....just my point of view...

Posted: at 25-07-2008 11:08 AM (16 years ago) | Addicted Hero
Reply
- Vixenx at 29-07-2008 06:38 AM (16 years ago)
(f)
All can make the decisions yourselves on whether u believe thats him or not...there were different gurls in that same video too. So i guess its about differentiating the girl from the others...
Posted: at 29-07-2008 06:38 AM (16 years ago) | Addicted Hero
Reply
- lilian106 at 31-07-2008 05:15 AM (16 years ago)
(f)
Just passin' by.

Posted: at 31-07-2008 05:15 AM (16 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- SOXFOXCMI at 11-08-2008 06:34 PM (16 years ago)
(m)
hi, guys
Posted: at 11-08-2008 06:34 PM (16 years ago) | Newbie
Reply
- double_n at 18-08-2008 10:53 PM (16 years ago)
(m)
That guy even pissed on the Girl
Posted: at 18-08-2008 10:53 PM (16 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- ngfineface at 3-09-2015 09:04 AM (9 years ago)
(f)
Just an agabaya that tried to lie his way out if his ordeal
Posted: at 3-09-2015 09:04 AM (9 years ago) | Hero
Reply

Featured Discussions