Woman dismissed from work for marrying a driver (Page 5)

who says drivers no get prick? coming to marrital life,watz d diff btw a driver and d MDs?

Posted: at 27-12-2009 11:00 PM (15 years ago) | Newbie

Love is blind! There is someone that has been mapping the woman but she rejected that's why they sacked her.

Posted: at 29-12-2009 05:30 PM (15 years ago) | Newbie

Proper investigation be done and if she and her husband not found guilty of any offence in the past or now, she has to be called back to work and be paid for the damages.

Posted: at 6-01-2010 06:26 AM (15 years ago) | Newbie

naija na waoo

Posted: at 6-01-2010 12:32 PM (15 years ago) | Hero

'However, Mrs. Tochukwu said that while she was aware of the NDLEA rule which forbids senior officers from getting married to their juniors, the fact remains that her husband is not a staff of the NDLEA.
“I did not get married to somebody in the same organization, my husband works with Niger Delta Development Commission (NDDC) while I work with NDLEA. The fact that my termination letter reads unapproved single parentage is misconceived or rather borne out of malice with a view to wrongfully terminate my appointment,” Mrs. Tochukwu noted'
There is no need to prolong the case, she observed the rules of the game and she equally played it right may be after her terminated appointment be restored then NDELEA should sit down again and reverse the rule or there should be a cluase to bind the feature defaulters.
 

Posted: at 7-01-2010 08:57 AM (15 years ago) | Newbie

eehhh na wa ooo, wot has her marrying the man of her choice got to do with her job? ppl are just insensitive.

Posted: at 7-01-2010 11:05 AM (15 years ago) | Gistmaniac

dis is pure rubbis! habi. dot we ve freedom again?

Posted: at 14-01-2010 12:43 PM (15 years ago) | Newbie

ask me again

Posted: at 15-01-2010 01:08 PM (15 years ago) | Hero

Na wa ooooooooo! Nja

Posted: at 17-01-2010 03:22 PM (15 years ago) | Newbie

Who marries who is not the business of the Employer but is the right of both consensual adults. This was a wrong decision dismissing this person.  In a better world, the dismissed employee needs to get a lawyer and file a  civil suite demanding written apologies and monetary compensations for pain, suffering, public humiliations, marital inference and loss of wages.  However, if there was clear and written advisement that the company does not allow relatives working in the same company to avoid favoritism, then, the Employer is covered in its decision to dismiss one of them but not both of them. There might be a case of miss communications, jealousy or segxwal armaments if I must speculate.

Posted: at 17-01-2010 09:09 PM (15 years ago) | Newbie