A Catholic Priest in Zambia appears in court for adultery (Page 3)

THAT WAS ONLY AN ALLEGATIONS THAT HAVE NOT BEEN SUBSTANTIATED WITH ANY TANGIBLE EVIDENCE. PEOPLE SHOULD BE VERY CAREFUL WITH THE WAY THEY ACCUSE PEOPLE MORE ESPECIALLY MEN OF GOD SO AS NOT TO ATTRACT GOD S ANGER ON THEMSELVES AND THEIR ENTIRE HOUSE HOLD. ALLEGATION AGAINST EVEN ANYBODY WITHOUT EVIDENCE IS VERY BAD IF YOU HAVE BEEN WRONGFULLY ACCUSED OF AN OFFENCE YOU DID NOT COMMIT. IF U HAVE HAD SUCH AN EXPERIENCE BEFORE THEN PUT YOUR SELF IN THOSE PEOPLE S SHOE WHO WERE BEING ACCUSED OF ONE CRIME OR THE THE OTHER THAT THEY DID NOT COMMIT. SOME OF YOU IN THIS FORUM ARE VERY FAST TO COME INTO CONCLUSIONS THAT EVERY ACCUSED IS GUILTY  WITHOUT ANY PROOF OR EVIDENCE .LETS BE CAREFUL WITH THE WAY WE JUDGE AND CONDEMN OTHERS BECAUSE ONE DAY YOU MIGHTY FIND YOUR SELF AT THE MERCY OF OTHER TO EITHER CONDEMN OR EXORNORATE  AND ACQUIT YOU. WHAT U DO TO OTHERS MIGHTY JUST BE AROUND THE CORNER WAITING FOR YOU.

that could not be regarded as a man of GOD , but that of an EVIL , except some one equally in the same characters with him will believe in the mess he was saying , he can,t defends the reasons behind the 77 phone call and 48 txt msgs , a very singul man , the husband self is too lenient on that dirty dog