The Bombay High Court has ruled that a wife's refusal to have sex with her husband without a condom does not constitute grounds for divorce.
Pradeep Bapat told the court his wife Prerna refused to have children because they were not financially stable.
The judges said Mr Bapat's other grounds for divorce, a lack of cooking and cleaning skills on his wife's part, were also not grounds for divorce.
They said arranged couples should get to know each other before marrying.
The couple (whose real names were not released to protect their privacy) married in February 2007 and by June Prerna had left their home.
"She wanted to give the child a better life. It is a mutual decision and a husband can not insist," said Justice PB Majmudar in remarks quoted by the Times of India.
Mr Bapat's lawyer told the court that his client wanted an educated, working woman as his wife, who would also do the housework.
"A woman is not a slave," Justice Majmudar said.
"You have put [common marital troubles] in the plea. If we construe these as cruelty, then no marriage will be safe."
In the ruling, made with fellow Justice Anoop Mohta, the judges said couples should get to know each other before marrying, especially in the case of arranged marriages.
"It is the duty of parents to consider various aspects before the actual marriage takes place," the judges said.
P.S DON'T HATE ME BCOZ OF WHAT COMES OUT OF MY MOUTH, I DON'T GIVE A SHIT ABOUT MYSELF, SO phyukOFF..
Posted: at 8-05-2012 04:26 AM (13 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Mr Bapat's lawyer told the court that his client wanted an educated, working woman as his wife, who would also do the housework. This man should hv said that he wants a slave as a wife na. Yeye mtcheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeew
Posted: at 8-05-2012 02:21 PM (13 years ago) | Hero
Mr Bapat's lawyer told the court that his client wanted an educated, working woman as his wife, who would also do the housework. This man should hv said that he wants a slave as a wife na. Yeye mtcheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeew
Please a woman who can do house work is not a slave rather a homely woman which is dream of every man.if she cannot clean nor cook,who will do that for her?the woman is not marriageable type if she cannot cook nor clean.hope u are not like that otherwise.........................
Posted: at 8-05-2012 03:25 PM (13 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Please a woman who can do house work is not a slave rather a homely woman which is dream of every man.if she cannot clean nor cook,who will do that for her?the woman is not marriageable type if she cannot cook nor clean.hope u are not like that otherwise.........................
may be she want to hire slave.................. she for tell d man na only to enjoy honeypot she want, no need to waste the man time
Posted: at 8-05-2012 03:37 PM (13 years ago) | Upcoming
Please a woman who can do house work is not a slave rather a homely woman which is dream of every man.if she cannot clean nor cook,who will do that for her?the woman is not marriageable type if she cannot cook nor clean.hope u are not like that otherwise.........................
Otherwise gini? You go divorce me abi? Y does he want an educated, working, who can keep the home front bla bla bla bla. What will be his own? If na only woman dey work, go sch, homely, wats his portion? Abeg leave me oooo his demand no get head, he no c say the woman no go sch, no work, no dey homely b4 he go marry am? Becos his finance is not stable dats y he wants a working class woman so that he will be obtaining money from her. mtcheeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeew
Posted: at 8-05-2012 04:11 PM (13 years ago) | Hero