Multichoice had earlier filed a writ of summons in Suit No. FHC/L/CS/1091/11 against MCSN, praying the court to grant a perpetual injunction stopping MCSN from asking or demanding from Multichoice to obtain copyright licence for the broadcast and communication to the public of musical works on the radio and television channels operated and
distributed by Multichoice within Nigeria because MCSN was not licensed or approved by the Nigerian Copyright Commission as a collecting society.
MCSNhad then filed a counterclaim of N5.2 billion for the infringement of its copyright by Multichoice Nigeria from 2006 till date.
Multichoice in its objection to MCSN’s counterclaim had relied on the Court of Appeal judgment in the case of Compact Discs Technologies Limited vs. MCSN delivered in March 2010, urging the court on that basis to dismiss the claim of MCSN.
MCSN in its defence argued by Mr. Norrison I. Quakers, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), who led Mr. Olumide Ekisola, contended that the Compact Disc judgment was not applicable to the Multichoice case due to the fact that the judgment was given per incuriam, that is, all necessary provisions of the Copyright Act and issues of laws were not
considered.
He argued further that the 1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and several authorities of the Court of Appeal and the Supreme Court are clear that interests already acquired by and vested in an individual cannot be divested retroactively or retrospectively by any law, as MCSN has acquired most of its copyright, which are the subject matter in the case before the enactment of the Copyright Act 2004 and the establishment of the Nigerian Copyright Commission.
MCSN further contended that Section 52 and Section 3 of the Fifth Schedule of the Copyright Act 2004 duly recognize and save the rights of MCSN which it has acquired under several contracts.
In its ruling, the Court agreed that the Compact Disc judgment is not applicable to the suit and the preliminary objection of Multichoice subsequently dismissed and the trial of the suit fixed for November 1st, 2012.
It will be recalled that the Nigerian Copyright Commission (NCC) had equally relied heavily on the Compact Discs judgment to incite many infringers of copyright in MCSN’s repertoire not to respect MCSN’s right because it (NCC) has not approved MCSN as a collecting society and thereby encouraging them to pay copyright royalties to COSON, which is not the owner of the copyright.
MCSN had on July 1, 2011 secured another Court of Appeal judgment in Appeal No. CA/L/494/09 between Visafone Limited vs. MCSN in which the Court of Appeal discountenanced the Compact Disc judgment and struck out Visafone’s preliminary objection to MCSN’s suit.
Following in the heels of the latest Court of Appeal judgment in the Visafone case, MCSN secured a judgment on July 25, 2011 at the Federal High Court in which the court declared the powers and actions of the NCC against MCSN with respect to its non-approval as a collecting society under Section 39 of the Copyright Act 2004 unconstitutional, null and void with a N40 Million damages awarded against NCC to MCSN.
| Posted: at | |
Neglito
denmal
micc
jamesbondchick
dlimelite
deboalabi262
analyzation
chicco77
queenrukky
Senegal
Toks-E
TRENDING GISTS 
EFCC Boss, Olukoyede Faces Visa Ban Threat Over Yahaya Bello's Case
Moses Bliss Reacts After A Troll Bashes Him For Allowing His Wife Preach Whenever They Go For Events
Manchester United v Arsenal: English Premier League Match,Team News,Goal Scorers and Stats
Your First Salary Belong To Your Father For His Blessings Not to Your Pastor - Kanayo O. Kanayo
JUST IN! Gov. Fubara Relocates Rivers Assembly Sitting To Government House
9yr Old Boy Stabs His 10yr Old Classmate to Death on Their Home From School