anything wrong for woman to finance marriage? (Page 6)

u see lol

Posted: at 27-09-2009 09:02 PM (15 years ago) | Gistmaniac

That's not cool. If a man can't fund his wedding in whole or part how on earth will he provide for his family? if the lady is Rich and she feels like supporting she can, but its not a must at.u understand @ least mutual understanding will always be in the family.as u know rom was not build in one day.

Posted: at 28-09-2009 10:18 AM (15 years ago) | Newbie

JUST PEEPIN IN

---

Posted: at 28-09-2009 04:12 PM (15 years ago) | Hero

So u ill like to be marry by a woman, instead of d other-way -round? funny

Posted: at 28-09-2009 04:38 PM (15 years ago) | Gistmaniac

To me i think is wrong, why would a woman fund my wedding wat make the man a man then? If you aint gat no cash you wait. One can not hurry the sun rise!!!!!!!!

Posted: at 29-09-2009 04:51 PM (15 years ago) | Newbie

The woman giving a hand to d husband-to-be, if she have a catch is not bad, but carrying it all is wat i don't buy d ideal

Posted: at 29-09-2009 05:51 PM (15 years ago) | Gistmaniac

Hell no, guys get more respect wen he finance d weddn

Posted: at 6-10-2009 05:16 PM (15 years ago) | Upcoming

na lie

Posted: at 6-10-2009 05:49 PM (15 years ago) | Upcoming

there is nthing wrong with that,if d guy understands dat the lady must finance d marriage but in most cases d guy tends to see it as an insult.

Posted: at 10-10-2009 12:29 PM (15 years ago) | Newbie

everything is wrong....wont marry if i gat no money

Posted: at 10-10-2009 04:15 PM (15 years ago) | Upcoming