Ideal Length Of Time To Leave Between Each Birth (Spacing Children) (Page 4)

Date: 12-09-2011 1:29 pm (12 years ago) | Author: INDEPENDENT WOMAN
1 2 3 [4] 5
- gloxxy98 at 13-09-2011 12:32 PM (12 years ago)
(f)
2 yrs is ideal
Posted: at 13-09-2011 12:32 PM (12 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- okrika at 13-09-2011 01:00 PM (12 years ago)
(m)
really spacing is very important in consideration of giving births for two basic reasons assuming that every other factors remains moderate within an acceptable range by our society definition.firstly, the health of the woman has to be  consider paramount she needs to recuperate physically and psychologically.permit me to say this is where the husband is expected to    show true  love and care to ensure that his wife is fit before any other baby making business.secondly,in order to instill value in the child.currently the character exhibited by many children is as a result   of lack of value which had eroded our society greatly.most parents forget that  without level headed children being fruits of value your old age will be terrible.currently,everybody is concerned with career and money making.i will conclude by saying other factors such as finance,marriage,education etc are moderate then i will advocate a minimum of 2 years for spacing.
Posted: at 13-09-2011 01:00 PM (12 years ago) | Newbie
Reply
- martins_sugabse at 13-09-2011 01:34 PM (12 years ago)
(m)
yeh 2-3years is ok
Posted: at 13-09-2011 01:34 PM (12 years ago) | Newbie
Reply
- kattie77 at 13-09-2011 02:17 PM (12 years ago)
(f)
na God dey give pickin,i go born dem as dem take cum
Posted: at 13-09-2011 02:17 PM (12 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- sobeit at 13-09-2011 02:22 PM (12 years ago)
(m)
3yrs is ideal space for me.
Posted: at 13-09-2011 02:22 PM (12 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- divineproject at 13-09-2011 02:34 PM (12 years ago)
(f)
I think 2 years is the ideal time............spacing helps the mother to recover from the effects of the previous childbirth............

Posted: at 13-09-2011 02:34 PM (12 years ago) | Hero
Reply
- virgineve at 13-09-2011 03:45 PM (12 years ago)
(m)
Its good u space ur children. There is no specified period, it depends on agreement
Posted: at 13-09-2011 03:45 PM (12 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- kebella at 13-09-2011 03:47 PM (12 years ago)
(f)
 Cool

Posted: at 13-09-2011 03:47 PM (12 years ago) | Addicted Hero
Reply
- chicanorose at 13-09-2011 03:53 PM (12 years ago)
(f)
For me, i will prefer a two year spacing on my children

Posted: at 13-09-2011 03:53 PM (12 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- MissyBarbie at 13-09-2011 03:58 PM (12 years ago)
(f)
6month
Posted: at 13-09-2011 03:58 PM (12 years ago) | Hero
Reply
- GoonishME at 13-09-2011 04:03 PM (12 years ago)
(m)
Well, no ideal time between and my gal, we had 3 in 3 years already, #Not easy tho#
Posted: at 13-09-2011 04:03 PM (12 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- doublevee at 13-09-2011 04:44 PM (12 years ago)
(f)
still learning
Posted: at 13-09-2011 04:44 PM (12 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- sobeit at 13-09-2011 04:51 PM (12 years ago)
(m)
Quote from: MissyBarbie on 13-09-2011 03:58 PM
6month

no why not 3days?
Posted: at 13-09-2011 04:51 PM (12 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- SirJ at 13-09-2011 05:04 PM (12 years ago)
(m)
It boils down to sociological needs....Personally I would say it really depends on the couple. But I think the further the spacing(within acceptable boundaries) the better but on the other side it might be more economical to have them all as soon as possible in circumstances that demands hiring a nanny like most career minded people do in places like the UK. So for two kids probably born within 2yrs, a nanny could be hired in between their births and possibly further after..You might end up hiring a nanny for just year. This is also the case as the grow..most things becomes cheaper as you are them buying in two's or three's. Maybe a funny illustration but that's reality and indeed a great concern for people that have only nannies to take care of their kids( because of work, studies etc) and their services are very expensive.  
Posted: at 13-09-2011 05:04 PM (12 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- onyiis at 15-09-2011 10:33 AM (12 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: jossy4reall on 12-09-2011 02:33 PM
Quote from: onyiis on 12-09-2011 02:27 PM
Quote from: jossy4reall on 12-09-2011 02:24 PM
Quote from: onyiis on 12-09-2011 02:13 PM
Quote from: jossy4reall on 12-09-2011 02:07 PM
I wish I kno about dis space..........do they go by jet or rocket?
anywayz.......the little I kno........spacing does not affect children`s health but wat I noticed in some cases is the d first issue alwayz looks smaller, more tiny, thinner, skinnier, leaner even more little than the one that comes after him/her........but it has nothing to do wit the babys health.................... what is more important is adequate nutrition

it does ..........when a child is weaned at the age of 3 months all bacause her mother is pregnant .............what do u call that ?


I call it three months weaned child and a pregnant mother ........... dat is double impact...........now wat do u call it? ......lets compare and come to conclusion.

who and who is suffering here ?

u never tell me wat u call it and u now ask me anoda question .........are u a questioner ??

its more than double impact because every member of the family will have his/her own share of the impact

Posted: at 15-09-2011 10:33 AM (12 years ago) | Hero
Reply
- onyiis at 15-09-2011 10:34 AM (12 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: HOPEA23 on 12-09-2011 02:36 PM
good couple

who ?  Grin Grin Grin Grin

Posted: at 15-09-2011 10:34 AM (12 years ago) | Hero
Reply
- onyiis at 15-09-2011 10:35 AM (12 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: purityjustice on 12-09-2011 02:47 PM
2YRS IS OKEY
BUT CHILD SPACING DEPENDS ON THE NUMBER OF CHILDREN U HAVE.


what do u mean by that ? Does spacing increase with a correspondent increse in the number of children or vice versa ?

Posted: at 15-09-2011 10:35 AM (12 years ago) | Hero
Reply
- onyiis at 15-09-2011 10:37 AM (12 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: sobeit on 12-09-2011 02:52 PM
Quote from: onyiis on 12-09-2011 02:08 PM
Quote from: HOPEA23 on 12-09-2011 01:57 PM
Quote from: onyiis on 12-09-2011 01:53 PM
Child spacing is very good for the health of the mother and that of the kids........a difference of 20 to 30 months between siblings is ideal
correct...but how about those who doesn't space theirs...what do you thik about the children and their mother health?

having children that are not well spaced could lead to some complications ...........when the uterus is not well relaxed before beeing exposed to anothe labour contractions could result in severe bleeding during and after delivery

i agree with you to some extent.but i've seen a family where the space between their kids are just 7-8 months apart.

it happens but most often the couple will tell u its a mistake ...........but in the end , the women suffers

Posted: at 15-09-2011 10:37 AM (12 years ago) | Hero
Reply
- onyiis at 15-09-2011 10:38 AM (12 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: HOPEA23 on 12-09-2011 03:00 PM
Quote from: sobeit on 12-09-2011 02:52 PM
Quote from: onyiis on 12-09-2011 02:08 PM
Quote from: HOPEA23 on 12-09-2011 01:57 PM
Quote from: onyiis on 12-09-2011 01:53 PM
Child spacing is very good for the health of the mother and that of the kids........a difference of 20 to 30 months between siblings is ideal
correct...but how about those who doesn't space theirs...what do you thik about the children and their mother health?

having children that are not well spaced could lead to some complications ...........when the uterus is not well relaxed before beeing exposed to anothe labour contractions could result in severe bleeding during and after delivery


heheheheheeeeeeee !!! maybe 7-8 months before the women gets pregnant again ...................or she normally has her kids prematuredly  Grin Grin Grin Grin
i agree with you to some extent.but i've seen a family where the space between their kids are just 7-8 months apart.
huh..wow
how is that possible?

Posted: at 15-09-2011 10:38 AM (12 years ago) | Hero
Reply
- onyiis at 15-09-2011 10:39 AM (12 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: HOPEA23 on 12-09-2011 03:15 PM
Quote from: sobeit on 12-09-2011 03:11 PM
Quote from: HOPEA23 on 12-09-2011 03:00 PM
Quote from: sobeit on 12-09-2011 02:52 PM
Quote from: onyiis on 12-09-2011 02:08 PM
Quote from: HOPEA23 on 12-09-2011 01:57 PM
Quote from: onyiis on 12-09-2011 01:53 PM
Child spacing is very good for the health of the mother and that of the kids........a difference of 20 to 30 months between siblings is ideal
correct...but how about those who doesn't space theirs...what do you thik about the children and their mother health?

having children that are not well spaced could lead to some complications ...........when the uterus is not well relaxed before beeing exposed to anothe labour contractions could result in severe bleeding during and after delivery

i agree with you to some extent.but i've seen a family where the space between their kids are just 7-8 months apart.
huh..wow
how is that possible?

my dear not kidding their 3kids got an average of 8 months apart.. me self don't know how possible it's
wow...the woman might be good in bed...

lol but getting pregant too often has no relationship with "bed expertise"  Grin Grin Grin Grin

Posted: at 15-09-2011 10:39 AM (12 years ago) | Hero
Reply
1 2 3 [4] 5