Somebody please explain what is going on with the banks to me,am a novist (Page 4)

what they are saying is dat dis banks Loan some pple, company money without a vaild collateral or say witout a collateral,and dis pple or company failled to pay d loan, so the money dat suppose to be multiplying and which d bank customer's suppose to be enjoying as an interest is now been tie down, meaning that d C.E.O or whatever(OGA) did not inform d C.B.N about it and dnt forget dis money is not for d c.e.o's but for the banks customers.
gbogbo enu ko lama fi soro,atleast u shd understand dat,there's no flame without fire!!!
i hope u get d clue.

Posted: at 31-08-2009 11:52 AM (14 years ago) | Upcoming

ok

Posted: at 31-08-2009 12:22 PM (14 years ago) | Gistmaniac

Thax a lot Kemo, o she gan
nice 2 have ppl like U who take time 2 explain the unknown, rather than those who chose 2 be sarcastic about what they themselves dont understand

Posted: at 31-08-2009 06:19 PM (14 years ago) | Newbie

HE NEEDS SLEEP

Posted: at 1-09-2009 08:40 AM (14 years ago) | Upcoming

good question

---

Posted: at 2-09-2009 11:52 AM (14 years ago) | Hero

no answer yet

---

Posted: at 2-09-2009 12:00 PM (14 years ago) | Hero

Well, me dey wait 4 d answer 2 dat question  o

Posted: at 2-09-2009 12:11 PM (14 years ago) | Newbie

I hear there's an agenda to this bank thing cos Vanguard healines today says EFCC is cajoling the bank Directors in its custody to surrender their shares in their various banks, which ofcos is a step towards complete takeover of the banks by other people, eg the directors of Intercontinental collectively own 51% of its shares,and for anybody to take over the bank,their shares ofcos would have to be higher

Posted: at 4-09-2009 01:29 PM (14 years ago) | Newbie