The "Independent" Woman (Page 3)

Date: 05-10-2008 5:26 am (15 years ago) | Author: King Samuel O Dguy
1 2 [3] 4 5
- keveen at 7-10-2008 04:45 AM (15 years ago)
(m)
Quote from: blackberryPearl on  7-10-2008 04:20 AM
why?

i had to check if u were already my buddy

Posted: at 7-10-2008 04:45 AM (15 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- hiddenpearl at 7-10-2008 04:54 AM (15 years ago)
(f)
Look all this talk of trust is all well and good until the woman is out on her behind! Every woman should be able to hold her own... have a job, have a way to provide for themselves. While the relationships you know may have been perfect, there are some that are terrible and end wrong... usually with the woman on flat on her face. Women should have independent means, and I intend to. There is nothing "foul" about that. She should help in the family and not just be a liability, but the in the case that the marriage fails as it so often does, then she will be able to support herself.
Posted: at 7-10-2008 04:54 AM (15 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- keveen at 7-10-2008 04:57 AM (15 years ago)
(m)
Quote from: hiddenpearl on  7-10-2008 04:54 AM
Look all this talk of trust is all well and good until the woman is out on her behind! Every woman should be able to hold her own... have a job, have a way to provide for themselves. While the relationships you know may have been perfect, there are some that are terrible and end wrong... usually with the woman on flat on her face. Women should have independent means, and I intend to. There is nothing "foul" about that. She should help in the family and not just be a liability, but the in the case that the marriage fails as it so often does, then she will be able to support herself.

r u talking about married women or fiancées ready to marry?

Posted: at 7-10-2008 04:57 AM (15 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- blackberryPearl at 7-10-2008 04:57 AM (15 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: keveen on  7-10-2008 04:45 AM
Quote from: blackberryPearl on  7-10-2008 04:20 AM
why?

i had to check if u were already my buddy
yeah we r buddies
Posted: at 7-10-2008 04:57 AM (15 years ago) | Hero
Reply
- hiddenpearl at 7-10-2008 05:03 AM (15 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: keveen on  7-10-2008 04:57 AM
Quote from: hiddenpearl on  7-10-2008 04:54 AM
Look all this talk of trust is all well and good until the woman is out on her behind! Every woman should be able to hold her own... have a job, have a way to provide for themselves. While the relationships you know may have been perfect, there are some that are terrible and end wrong... usually with the woman on flat on her face. Women should have independent means, and I intend to. There is nothing "foul" about that. She should help in the family and not just be a liability, but the in the case that the marriage fails as it so often does, then she will be able to support herself.

r u talking about married women or fiancées ready to marry?

Whatever they are... single, engaged, married - women should be able to provide for themselves, they should be able to stand independently! I'm set on that opinion.
Posted: at 7-10-2008 05:03 AM (15 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- blackberryPearl at 7-10-2008 05:04 AM (15 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: hiddenpearl on  7-10-2008 05:03 AM
Quote from: keveen on  7-10-2008 04:57 AM
Quote from: hiddenpearl on  7-10-2008 04:54 AM
Look all this talk of trust is all well and good until the woman is out on her behind! Every woman should be able to hold her own... have a job, have a way to provide for themselves. While the relationships you know may have been perfect, there are some that are terrible and end wrong... usually with the woman on flat on her face. Women should have independent means, and I intend to. There is nothing "foul" about that. She should help in the family and not just be a liability, but the in the case that the marriage fails as it so often does, then she will be able to support herself.

r u talking about married women or fiancées ready to marry?

Whatever they are... single, engaged, married - women should be able to provide for themselves, they should be able to stand independently! I'm set on that opinion.
i agree but it should be a joint something
Posted: at 7-10-2008 05:04 AM (15 years ago) | Hero
Reply
- hiddenpearl at 7-10-2008 05:14 AM (15 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: blackberryPearl on  7-10-2008 05:04 AM
Quote from: hiddenpearl on  7-10-2008 05:03 AM
Quote from: keveen on  7-10-2008 04:57 AM
Quote from: hiddenpearl on  7-10-2008 04:54 AM
Look all this talk of trust is all well and good until the woman is out on her behind! Every woman should be able to hold her own... have a job, have a way to provide for themselves. While the relationships you know may have been perfect, there are some that are terrible and end wrong... usually with the woman on flat on her face. Women should have independent means, and I intend to. There is nothing "foul" about that. She should help in the family and not just be a liability, but the in the case that the marriage fails as it so often does, then she will be able to support herself.

r u talking about married women or fiancées ready to marry?



Whatever they are... single, engaged, married - women should be able to provide for themselves, they should be able to stand independently! I'm set on that opinion.
i agree but it should be a joint something


Is there a prenuptial agreement involved in that case? I'm just saying she should protect her assets.Grin;D

Fine, I'll back down gracefully... you both obviously feel very strongly about the institution of marriage.
Posted: at 7-10-2008 05:14 AM (15 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- blackberryPearl at 7-10-2008 05:15 AM (15 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: hiddenpearl on  7-10-2008 05:14 AM
Quote from: blackberryPearl on  7-10-2008 05:04 AM
Quote from: hiddenpearl on  7-10-2008 05:03 AM
Quote from: keveen on  7-10-2008 04:57 AM
Quote from: hiddenpearl on  7-10-2008 04:54 AM
Look all this talk of trust is all well and good until the woman is out on her behind! Every woman should be able to hold her own... have a job, have a way to provide for themselves. While the relationships you know may have been perfect, there are some that are terrible and end wrong... usually with the woman on flat on her face. Women should have independent means, and I intend to. There is nothing "foul" about that. She should help in the family and not just be a liability, but the in the case that the marriage fails as it so often does, then she will be able to support herself.

r u talking about married women or fiancées ready to marry?



Whatever they are... single, engaged, married - women should be able to provide for themselves, they should be able to stand independently! I'm set on that opinion.
i agree but it should be a joint something


Is there a prenuptial agreement involved in that case? I'm just saying she should protect her assets.Grin;D

Fine, I'll back down gracefully... you both obviously feel very strongly about the institution of marriage.
honestly speaking, i agree with u.
Posted: at 7-10-2008 05:15 AM (15 years ago) | Hero
Reply
- keveen at 7-10-2008 05:19 AM (15 years ago)
(m)
Quote from: hiddenpearl on  7-10-2008 05:03 AM
Quote from: keveen on  7-10-2008 04:57 AM
Quote from: hiddenpearl on  7-10-2008 04:54 AM
Look all this talk of trust is all well and good until the woman is out on her behind! Every woman should be able to hold her own... have a job, have a way to provide for themselves. While the relationships you know may have been perfect, there are some that are terrible and end wrong... usually with the woman on flat on her face. Women should have independent means, and I intend to. There is nothing "foul" about that. She should help in the family and not just be a liability, but the in the case that the marriage fails as it so often does, then she will be able to support herself.

r u talking about married women or fiancées ready to marry?

Whatever they are... single, engaged, married - women should be able to provide for themselves, they should be able to stand independently! I'm set on that opinion.

Why not they should... but some women got bigheads... and they begin to disrespect their man, mostly when the man doesn't have much as the woman... But I support a woman that's capable of providing for herself and sharing with her man ...

Posted: at 7-10-2008 05:19 AM (15 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- blackberryPearl at 7-10-2008 05:23 AM (15 years ago)
(f)
yeah
Posted: at 7-10-2008 05:23 AM (15 years ago) | Hero
Reply
- keveen at 7-10-2008 05:25 AM (15 years ago)
(m)
Quote from: blackberryPearl on  7-10-2008 05:23 AM
yeah

Yeah right...

Posted: at 7-10-2008 05:25 AM (15 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- blackberryPearl at 7-10-2008 05:26 AM (15 years ago)
(f)
seriously
Posted: at 7-10-2008 05:26 AM (15 years ago) | Hero
Reply
- keveen at 7-10-2008 05:31 AM (15 years ago)
(m)
Quote from: hiddenpearl on  7-10-2008 05:14 AM
Quote from: blackberryPearl on  7-10-2008 05:04 AM
Quote from: hiddenpearl on  7-10-2008 05:03 AM
Quote from: keveen on  7-10-2008 04:57 AM
Quote from: hiddenpearl on  7-10-2008 04:54 AM
Look all this talk of trust is all well and good until the woman is out on her behind! Every woman should be able to hold her own... have a job, have a way to provide for themselves. While the relationships you know may have been perfect, there are some that are terrible and end wrong... usually with the woman on flat on her face. Women should have independent means, and I intend to. There is nothing "foul" about that. She should help in the family and not just be a liability, but the in the case that the marriage fails as it so often does, then she will be able to support herself.

r u talking about married women or fiancées ready to marry?



Whatever they are... single, engaged, married - women should be able to provide for themselves, they should be able to stand independently! I'm set on that opinion.
i agree but it should be a joint something


Is there a prenuptial agreement involved in that case? I'm just saying she should protect her assets.Grin;D

Fine, I'll back down gracefully... you both obviously feel very strongly about the institution of marriage.

Right on the same track... Cheesy I am really impressed with ur posts anyway

Posted: at 7-10-2008 05:31 AM (15 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- ifeyemi5 at 7-10-2008 06:01 AM (15 years ago)
(f)
nice pic you got there blackberrypearl
Posted: at 7-10-2008 06:01 AM (15 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- urguy4life at 7-10-2008 07:08 AM (15 years ago)
(m)
@ topic, this song sends a wrong message, though its has a cool flow...to me it's just some infatuated story and not love...if u truly love someone then you wont bother about their status and others cos u should'nt be inlove because they are independent...thats why it is called love.......cos its a natural thing. Its thesame as a woman saying - i love him cos he gat his own.....so there will be no love if as a guy am not independent lol....its all infatuation because love is something natural that is not motivated by status or whatever else. nayo says - i love her cos shes gat her own lol....anyway thats some twixted shit...dats aint love men!

my baby should only work because she really wants to......apart from that, it cant matter

weather shes jobless or independent or not because thats not why i will love her....lolll

the song just explains some infatuation that is called love.....note that countless indenpdent people (celebrities) have remarraid and have broken up again and again, so why the emphasis on independency if there is love?................ave you ever wondered why people break up? even those that have the money of the world?.....the song features the american top version of love... i have experienced america and i can say...you can find something like love is on every lip, but there is nothing that resembles love in that country! neyo needs will needs some lessons...

meanwhy it will be my greateat honour to give the woman i cherish, anything she bugs for!!!
Posted: at 7-10-2008 07:08 AM (15 years ago) | Newbie
Reply
- blackberryPearl at 7-10-2008 07:15 AM (15 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: ifeyemi5 on  7-10-2008 06:01 AM
nice pic you got there blackberrypearl
thank u very much
Posted: at 7-10-2008 07:15 AM (15 years ago) | Hero
Reply
- mazi at 7-10-2008 08:14 AM (15 years ago)
(m)
Quote from: extraclass on  6-10-2008 11:19 PM
Quote from: swagga on  5-10-2008 11:14 AM

AWESOME SONG

BUT STILL RATHER LOVE TO BE SPENT ON THAN ME SPENDING ON ME

if u wanna date with me u have to spend on me and my beauty and to look after me. u should be only happy when able to see me. otherwise im not good match for u. old good times.
if continue like dis....u r gonna expire in three months time.
Posted: at 7-10-2008 08:14 AM (15 years ago) | Hero
Reply
- ifeyemi5 at 7-10-2008 10:39 PM (15 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: keveen on  7-10-2008 05:19 AM
Quote from: hiddenpearl on  7-10-2008 05:03 AM
Quote from: keveen on  7-10-2008 04:57 AM
Quote from: hiddenpearl on  7-10-2008 04:54 AM
Look all this talk of trust is all well and good until the woman is out on her behind! Every woman should be able to hold her own... have a job, have a way to provide for themselves. While the relationships you know may have been perfect, there are some that are terrible and end wrong... usually with the woman on flat on her face. Women should have independent means, and I intend to. There is nothing "foul" about that. She should help in the family and not just be a liability, but the in the case that the marriage fails as it so often does, then she will be able to support herself.

r u talking about married women or fiancées ready to marry?

Whatever they are... single, engaged, married - women should be able to provide for themselves, they should be able to stand independently! I'm set on that opinion.

Why not they should... but some women got bigheads... and they begin to disrespect their man, mostly when the man doesn't have much as the woman... But I support a woman that's capable of providing for herself and sharing with her man ...
sorry oh the man some men are insecure when they see a lady  that makes money more than them.most men dont apprieciate it when a woman shares money.so its better for a woman to keep her money.do me i do you.if he shares then i share if he dont then i dont.
Posted: at 7-10-2008 10:39 PM (15 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- keveen at 7-10-2008 11:08 PM (15 years ago)
(m)
r u tellin' dat to your marriage husband? or the man u intend to marry? how mean...

Posted: at 7-10-2008 11:08 PM (15 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- Kennee at 7-10-2008 11:37 PM (15 years ago)
(m)
Getting Bored by...................... yawwwwwnnnnnnnnnnnnn

Posted: at 7-10-2008 11:37 PM (15 years ago) | Addicted Hero
Reply
1 2 [3] 4 5