SHOCKING :black africans built & rule ancient kemet EGYPT

That could only be true if the definition of "black" was stretched well beyond the limits.

Posted: at 4-02-2012 12:04 AM (13 years ago) | Gistmaniac

The Afrikan Nile Valley is the seat of civilization. all that the europeans have is the carbon copy of Kemet Civilization

Posted: at 4-02-2012 12:51 PM (13 years ago) | Upcoming

cummy white what do u mean by it will be true if the definition of black was stretched well beyond the limits?could u pls share some more lights..

Posted: at 4-02-2012 02:05 PM (13 years ago) | Upcoming

space alien? that the shit they fill you up with in your stupid Europeans schools.. not surprised at all. I know one thing for fact that europeans are latecomers in contribution of world civilization. the foundation of knowledge and civilization of Europe lies in Afrika not Europe

Posted: at 4-02-2012 03:58 PM (13 years ago) | Upcoming

when i read the message to the blackman in america i was shock to find out how white race was living in europe before moses start teaching them how to cook eat lite fire brought civilzation to them they start coming to africa to learn from the first ancient university in the world where all the teachers are blacks,after learning from us they go back and unite came back to africa and start fighting killing rapping enslaving africans by force,
they replace most of the egypt status with their status and that was when they brought christianity to africa later the arabs with islam,
time to go back to our ancestors spirituality because white civilization and religions brought nothing to africa but pain hate divide racism diseases Lesbianism homosegxwal have sex with animals e.t.c

Posted: at 5-02-2012 08:31 AM (13 years ago) | Upcoming

to include?

Posted: at 5-02-2012 09:26 PM (13 years ago) | Upcoming

No, I'm calling you racist for stating that Europeans couldn't even make fire or cook without the help of some mythical Jewish prophet.

Just for the record, Africans share the guilt for slavery because African rulers sold Africans to the slave traders.

Posted: at 6-02-2012 11:24 AM (13 years ago) | Gistmaniac

No-one came and put a gun to the chiefs' heads and forced them to trade Africans for cheap guns, booze, beads and gewgaws.

Also, you forget that Arabs were the biggest of the slave buyers - and still keep slaves, after a fashion, in places like Dubai and Saudi Arabia. But then they're not Europeans, so I guess that doesn't concern you.

Posted: at 6-02-2012 12:00 PM (13 years ago) | Gistmaniac

No-one in Europe put Goodluck in power, or Mugabe, or Mengistu, or Idi Amin, or Obote... need I go on? You just can't accept that you've screwed up your own destiny.

Oh, and HIV-AIDS didn't come out of a Western lab; you do yourself no favours quoting conspiracist drivel.

Posted: at 6-02-2012 12:59 PM (13 years ago) | Gistmaniac

Well, let's see your questions...


Well, I'm not American, but I will point out that slavery was ended in the US after the Civil War. Of course, then there was the KKK, but that's another matter entirely.

the most dangerous people on planet bombing droping nuclear missiles are all from your race so could that also be am racist?

There were two (2) bombs dropped on Japan in 1945. Since then nukes have spread outside Eurasia and the US to China, Israel, Pakistan, and India; now North Korea and Iran are working on their nuke programs and it's said that Saudi Arabia wants nukes of its own. At this rate, the next to use a nuclear weapon might well not be 'white'.


Depends on how you define genocide. To quote Wikipedia (my emphasis): Genocide is defined as "the deliberate and systematic destruction, in whole or in part, of an ethnic, racial, religious, or national group",[1] though what constitutes enough of a "part" to qualify as genocide has been subject to much debate by legal scholars.[2] While a precise definition varies among genocide scholars, a legal definition is found in the 1948 United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide (CPPCG). Article 2 of this convention defines genocide as "any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life, calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group children of the group to another group."[3]. It can simply also be known as the intent to destroy a group, in part or in whole. Intent must be proven, otherwise the crime cannot be identified as genocide. By that definition, enslavement of Africans is not genocide; the Armenian, Bosnian and Rwandan massacres, and the Holocaust, definitely are. So you're not racist; merely wrong.


No trickery was involved; just good old-fashioned free trade. if the tribes in Africa were cynical and greedy enough to sell Africans to Arabs and Europeans, then that shows what A*#Ss both sides were.


You didn't mention any names; I supplied some to prove my point.


Actually, Mugabe destroyed Zimbabwe's economy by his own stupid actions. No-one forced him to do that.


You would prefer to be ruled by dictators like Amin or Obote?


I'm not going to descend to your level. If you're going to resort to drivel like that, then you've admitted to losing the argument.

Posted: at 7-02-2012 11:43 AM (13 years ago) | Gistmaniac