Expectant Fathers Are No Longer Obligated To Donate Blood Ahead Of Their Partner's Delivery

Date: 03-03-2020 8:00 am (5 years ago) | Author: success Xenab
- at 3-03-2020 08:00 AM (5 years ago)
(m)

An Ikeja High Court has ordered government hospitals in Lagos State to stop demanding compulsory blood donations from women seeking antenatal and maternity services.

The court, in a judgment by Justice Raliat Adebiyi, declared the practice as “arbitrary, unfair and a violation of human rights as enshrined in Section 38(1) of the 1999 Constitution.”

Striking down the policy, which had been in existence for years, Justice Adebiyi described it as unconscionable, saying it was “adverse to the life and well-being of all citizens that access the respondent’s facilities.”

The judge’s pronouncement on Monday followed a fundamental human rights suit filed by an advocacy group, Socio-Economic Rights and Accountability Project, which said it had been inundated with complaints by residents about the state hospital policy of compulsory blood donation by spouses of pregnant women seeking antenatal care.

SERAP had, in the suit, contended that the compulsory blood donation policy was contrary to Section 33 of the 1999 Constitution, which guarantees the right of Nigerians to life.

Agreeing with the group in her judgment on Monday, Justice Adebiyi held that the actions of the hospitals and facilities were violations of the rights of residents of Lagos to a system of health protection.

She said, “The respondents are hereby ordered to forthwith stop or discontinue the policy of insisting on compulsory blood donations from patients or relatives of those seeking medical care and attention before accessing antenatal, maternal or any health services in the facilities of the respondents.”

Joined as respondents in the suit were the Attorney General of Lagos State, Lagos State Ministry of Health and the Commissioner for Health, Lagos State.


Posted: at 3-03-2020 08:00 AM (5 years ago) | Hero
- olowoinlionsden at 3-03-2020 08:17 AM (5 years ago)
(m)
I believe the Practice has its merit. In the situation where most of our Hospitals lack the basic necessities, for example, ordinary cotton wool, it would save life in situations where blood requirement would be in urgent requirement. One point we are missing here is, husbands may now know if the new born is theirs or not, if the blood of the new born does not match those of the supposed legal parents.
Posted: at 3-03-2020 08:17 AM (5 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- jahlovesme at 3-03-2020 09:42 AM (5 years ago)
(m)
okay Huh? Huh? Huh?
Posted: at 3-03-2020 09:42 AM (5 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply
- module at 3-03-2020 04:19 PM (5 years ago)
(m)
in most occasion d patient never get to use it because it's not necessary and when a patient who needs it gets to use it they are asked to pay 4 it and d amount is always very high. This is something someone donated for free. May GOD ALMIGHTY help this country. I think it should be strike down
Posted: at 3-03-2020 04:19 PM (5 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- allenspike at 3-03-2020 04:21 PM (5 years ago)
(m)
Quote from: olowoinlionsden on  3-03-2020 08:17 AM
I believe the Practice has its merit. In the situation where most of our Hospitals lack the basic necessities, for example, ordinary cotton wool, it would save life in situations where blood requirement would be in urgent requirement. One point we are missing here is, husbands may now know if the new born is theirs or not, if the blood of the new born does not match those of the supposed legal parents.
what ya saying?

Posted: at 3-03-2020 04:21 PM (5 years ago) | Gistmaniac
Reply

Featured Discussions