Church bans chieftaincy titles, wedding for pregnant women, others (Page 5)

Date: 24-06-2011 3:49 am (12 years ago) | Author: Peter Izu
1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8
- emekaralph at 24-06-2011 09:01 PM (12 years ago)
(m)
Quote from: frayobkk on 24-06-2011 11:17 AM
Chieftaincy titles lol  looking to get n title with

What point??? Apart from Chieftaincy Title every other thing is rubbish!! Why should the church be the last point of call before any other place??? in the right sense the church should be the firts... God should come first!!

I don't understand, I must confess the Bishop is being myopic and an authoritarian and fails to be rationale. It is only right for a couple to got to the registry to register their marriage in the eys of the Law and then come to Chuch for a weeding afterwards or on a later date. Their is no underlying principle that traditional marriage must come first.

In addition, does it mean an unmarried pregnant woman is condemned to hell and shouldn't seek right in the eyes of God?? What happened to forgiveness. What the Church should do is to conscientize it's congregationon the need of not engaging in pre-marital sex and also to counsel defaulters and not come out with this kind of In-human laws!! he next thing that will happen is that Abortion etc will become rampant becos of such rigidity. it's better to treat a dying plant from the roots by moulding a faithful congregation rather than solving problems from the branches/leaves... doesnt make sense...   He should go and say all these to the Anglican communion in the west where they encourage homosegxwals and have gay bishops abeg!!
Posted: at 24-06-2011 09:01 PM (12 years ago) | Newbie
Reply
- emekaralph at 24-06-2011 09:04 PM (12 years ago)
(m)
Quote from: betty55 on 24-06-2011 08:06 PM
l think traditional marriage should come b4 the church.the both parent has to agree b4 the church blessing.that it does.nt seems right in the sight of men does,nt mean that pastors and priest should be compromising the word of God.

Which word of God??? Where is it in the bible that traditional marriage should come first.... stop being myopic!! traditional marraige is not the agreement of the parents... the parents normally agree long before the traditional or the church wedding... The chuch wedding is also an agreement of the parents, the couple and GOD... get this into ur skull!
Posted: at 24-06-2011 09:04 PM (12 years ago) | Newbie
Reply
- emekaralph at 24-06-2011 09:05 PM (12 years ago)
(m)
Quote from: itoroesie on 24-06-2011 11:14 AM
He's got a point, Christianity is fast becoming something else. I agree with u Bishop


What point??? Apart from Chieftaincy Title every other thing is rubbish!! Why should the church be the last point of call before any other place??? in the right sense the church should be the firts... God should come first!!

I don't understand, I must confess the Bishop is being myopic and an authoritarian and fails to be rationale. It is only right for a couple to got to the registry to register their marriage in the eys of the Law and then come to Chuch for a weeding afterwards or on a later date. Their is no underlying principle that traditional marriage must come first.

In addition, does it mean an unmarried pregnant woman is condemned to hell and shouldn't seek right in the eyes of God?? What happened to forgiveness. What the Church should do is to conscientize it's congregationon the need of not engaging in pre-marital sex and also to counsel defaulters and not come out with this kind of In-human laws!! he next thing that will happen is that Abortion etc will become rampant becos of such rigidity. it's better to treat a dying plant from the roots by moulding a faithful congregation rather than solving problems from the branches/leaves... doesnt make sense...   He should go and say all these to the Anglican communion in the west where they encourage homosegxwals and have gay bishops abeg!!
Posted: at 24-06-2011 09:05 PM (12 years ago) | Newbie
Reply
- emekaralph at 24-06-2011 09:07 PM (12 years ago)
(m)
Quote from: chakamaroon on 24-06-2011 12:47 PM
BISHOP IKEAKOR WHERE HAVE U BEEN ALL THIS WHILE ?
ITS CLERGY MEN LIKE U THAT WE 'VE BEEN LOOKING OUT
FOR. I SUPPORT U WITH THE LAST DROP OF MY BLOOD,BECOS
ALL UR INSTANCES MAKE SO MUCH SENSE.
  GOT TO GO SEE MY BOSS.


What point??? Apart from Chieftaincy Title every other thing is rubbish!! Why should the church be the last point of call before any other place??? in the right sense the church should be the firts... God should come first!!

I don't understand, I must confess the Bishop is being myopic and an authoritarian and fails to be rationale. It is only right for a couple to got to the registry to register their marriage in the eys of the Law and then come to Chuch for a weeding afterwards or on a later date. Their is no underlying principle that traditional marriage must come first.

In addition, does it mean an unmarried pregnant woman is condemned to hell and shouldn't seek right in the eyes of God?? What happened to forgiveness. What the Church should do is to conscientize it's congregationon the need of not engaging in pre-marital sex and also to counsel defaulters and not come out with this kind of In-human laws!! he next thing that will happen is that Abortion etc will become rampant becos of such rigidity. it's better to treat a dying plant from the roots by moulding a faithful congregation rather than solving problems from the branches/leaves... doesnt make sense...   He should go and say all these to the Anglican communion in the west where they encourage homosegxwals and have gay bishops abeg!!
Posted: at 24-06-2011 09:07 PM (12 years ago) | Newbie
Reply
- deboalabi262 at 24-06-2011 10:03 PM (12 years ago)
(m)
Read and noted..

Posted: at 24-06-2011 10:03 PM (12 years ago) | Hero
Reply
- lovecommander at 24-06-2011 10:06 PM (12 years ago)
(m)
this bishop seems jobless. he has created a problem without preferring solution. so he now approves that couples should have children outside wedlock.
Posted: at 24-06-2011 10:06 PM (12 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- betty55 at 24-06-2011 10:43 PM (12 years ago)
(f)
Quote from: emekaralph on 24-06-2011 09:04 PM
Quote from: betty55 on 24-06-2011 08:06 PM
l think traditional marriage should come b4 the church.the both parent has to agree b4 the church blessing.that it does.nt seems right in the sight of men does,nt mean that pastors and priest should be compromising the word of God.

Which word of God??? Where is it in the bible that traditional marriage should come first.... stop being myopic!! traditional marraige is not the agreement of the parents... the parents normally agree long before the traditional or the church wedding... The chuch wedding is also an agreement of the parents, the couple and GOD... get this into ur skull!
those it pay u to be rude and insultive pls next time remenber the word gentle man b4 typing.
Posted: at 24-06-2011 10:43 PM (12 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- ajanni at 24-06-2011 10:44 PM (12 years ago)
(m)
holy father
Posted: at 24-06-2011 10:44 PM (12 years ago) | Grande Master
Reply
- kenolis at 24-06-2011 10:57 PM (12 years ago)
(m)
Quote from: pasnass on 24-06-2011 04:47 AM
i agree with him on some area


so why you come dey tell me na??
Posted: at 24-06-2011 10:57 PM (12 years ago) | Hero
Reply
- Innoutt at 24-06-2011 10:59 PM (12 years ago)
(m)
  It is not bad nor ungodly to be economical in everything including marriage, but rational even with the extract of knowledge from Bible. Wasting everything at disposal for marriage is always condemned by men of God during advice time. The Bishop has declared his own stand thereby challenging the members to use their brain and make their choice. It is generally good to make it plain.
  It is better to be precise of your choice than to be a victim of RELIGIOUS versus TRADITIONAL WAR as long as Nigeria is concern. Many people value their heart as the only good thing in them giving little respect to their mind and no value to brain at all, but the call to recognize the place of brain in every human activity is still high in Africa.
  The highest and most enjoyable thing in human life is to have an active brain or mentality cos that is the only thing you can vouch for your offspring at your absent. Truth are always there and men of God are always trying to make it clear in any form.
Posted: at 24-06-2011 10:59 PM (12 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- hosbert at 24-06-2011 11:04 PM (12 years ago)
(m)
But a woman who would have terminated several pregnancies just to be appear as though she had not been pregnant before can deceive the church into wedding her right? I do not support promiscuity but we should always look inwards and take decisions that would foster unity in our families while discouraging actions that could lead to the commission of a more gravious sin.
Posted: at 24-06-2011 11:04 PM (12 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- proly at 24-06-2011 11:06 PM (12 years ago)
(f)
beter i like dat all those ozo alulumani
Posted: at 24-06-2011 11:06 PM (12 years ago) | Hero
Reply
- kenolis at 24-06-2011 11:07 PM (12 years ago)
(m)
 Lips Sealed Lips Sealed Lips Sealed Lips Sealed Shocked Shocked Shocked Shocked
Posted: at 24-06-2011 11:07 PM (12 years ago) | Hero
Reply
- Innoutt at 24-06-2011 11:14 PM (12 years ago)
(m)
Quote from: emekaralph on 24-06-2011 09:01 PM
Quote from: frayobkk on 24-06-2011 11:17 AM
Chieftaincy titles lol  looking to get n title with

What point??? Apart from Chieftaincy Title every other thing is rubbish!! Why should the church be the last point of call before any other place??? in the right sense the church should be the firts... God should come first!!

I don't understand, I must confess the Bishop is being myopic and an authoritarian and fails to be rationale. It is only right for a couple to got to the registry to register their marriage in the eys of the Law and then come to Chuch for a weeding afterwards or on a later date. Their is no underlying principle that traditional marriage must come first.

In addition, does it mean an unmarried pregnant woman is condemned to hell and shouldn't seek right in the eyes of God?? What happened to forgiveness. What the Church should do is to conscientize it's congregationon the need of not engaging in pre-marital sex and also to counsel defaulters and not come out with this kind of In-human laws!! he next thing that will happen is that Abortion etc will become rampant becos of such rigidity. it's better to treat a dying plant from the roots by moulding a faithful congregation rather than solving problems from the branches/leaves... doesnt make sense...   He should go and say all these to the Anglican communion in the west where they encourage homosegxwals and have gay bishops abeg!!
Posted: at 24-06-2011 11:14 PM (12 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- feyee at 24-06-2011 11:15 PM (12 years ago)
(f)
 Lips Sealed Lips Sealed Lips Sealed Lips Sealed Lips Sealed Lips Sealed
Posted: at 24-06-2011 11:15 PM (12 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- Innoutt at 24-06-2011 11:20 PM (12 years ago)
(m)
Quote from: emekaralph on 24-06-2011 09:04 PM
Quote from: betty55 on 24-06-2011 08:06 PM
l think traditional marriage should come b4 the church.the both parent has to agree b4 the church blessing.that it does.nt seems right in the sight of men does,nt mean that pastors and priest should be compromising the word of God.

Which word of God??? Where is it in the bible that traditional marriage should come first.... stop being myopic!! traditional marraige is not the agreement of the parents... the parents normally agree long before the traditional or the church wedding... The chuch wedding is also an agreement of the parents, the couple and GOD... get this into ur skull!

If it were possible some xtian leaders would like to do away with Bible and lead the unconcerned members with their mind but it's quite unfortunate that Bilble has spread so much beyond control. The truth is always standing on a light as the cross of Jesus in the followers mind.  Shocked Shocked Shocked
Posted: at 24-06-2011 11:20 PM (12 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- Innoutt at 24-06-2011 11:45 PM (12 years ago)
(m)
   This type of leaders don't have time for their choosing commission but are always taken by extemporization only to end up in striding off the Bible to the extent of being economically irrational thereby bringing shame to the GOSPEL.
   Some westerners' life are better than some certain confusion that trail abuse on sincere worshipers'-'royalty' and depreciate the glory of the GOSPEL, cos westerners could accept that some of their bastard act did not emanate from Bible but personal choice backed by law.  It's a piety.  Cool Cool Cool
Posted: at 24-06-2011 11:45 PM (12 years ago) | Upcoming
Reply
- ceejay58 at 25-06-2011 12:45 AM (12 years ago)
(m)
Quote from: toibeli on 24-06-2011 02:08 PM
Instead of dwelling on wedding for pregnant women, and banning chieftaincy titles,
can the rev. gentleman do something about juju, charms, and poisoning which is
prevalent in that part of the country.

AND WHERE IN AFRICA RE JUJU, CHARMS AND POISONING NOT PREVALENT? 

or are u from another planet?
Posted: at 25-06-2011 12:45 AM (12 years ago) | Hero
Reply
- ceejay58 at 25-06-2011 12:59 AM (12 years ago)
(m)
Quote from: Innoutt on 24-06-2011 10:59 PM
 It is not bad nor ungodly to be economical in everything including marriage, but rational even with the extract of knowledge from Bible. Wasting everything at disposal for marriage is always condemned by men of God during advice time. The Bishop has declared his own stand thereby challenging the members to use their brain and make their choice. It is generally good to make it plain.
  It is better to be precise of your choice than to be a victim of RELIGIOUS versus TRADITIONAL WAR as long as Nigeria is concern. Many people value their heart as the only good thing in them giving little respect to their mind and no value to brain at all, but the call to recognize the place of brain in every human activity is still high in Africa.
  The highest and most enjoyable thing in human life is to have an active brain or mentality cos that is the only thing you can vouch for your offspring at your absent. Truth are always there and men of God are always trying to make it clear in any form.

Salute!!
Posted: at 25-06-2011 12:59 AM (12 years ago) | Hero
Reply
- ceejay58 at 25-06-2011 01:07 AM (12 years ago)
(m)
Quote from: hosbert on 24-06-2011 11:04 PM
But a woman who would have terminated several pregnancies just to be appear as though she had not been pregnant before can deceive the church into wedding her right? I do not support promiscuity but we should always look inwards and take decisions that would foster unity in our families while discouraging actions that could lead to the commission of a more gravious sin.


My brother wedding in the church should be sacred. If ur wife is pregnant b/4 ur wedding then u have an option of Court marriage or the Traditional one..  The lay down principles of the most high must never be compromised to please the children of men.
Posted: at 25-06-2011 01:07 AM (12 years ago) | Hero
Reply
1 2 3 4 [5] 6 7 8